Advertisement

Planta

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 143–157 | Cite as

Thigmomorphogenesis: The response of plant growth and development to mechanical stimulation

With special reference to Bryonia dioica
  • M. J. Jaffe
Article

Summary

When young plants of Hordeum vulgare. Bryonia dioica. Cucumis sativus. Phaseolus vulgaris. Mimosa pudica. and Ricinus communis. were given a gentle mechanical stimulus by rubbing the internodes for about 10 s once or twice daily, elongation was significantly retarded. Plants of Cucurbita pepo Pisum sativum and Triticum aestivum did not exhibit any such response. The initial response to rubbing was very rapid, elongation stopping less than 3 min after application of the stimulus. When the stimulus was discontinued after 7 days, elongation accelerated, reaching a normal or supernormal rate within 3 or 4 days. Mechanical stimulation also affected aspects of growth and development other than stem elongation. In Mimosa pudica, flower bud production was retarded, as was the growth of the tendrils, leaves, and petioles in Bryonia dioica. It is suggested that this response be called thigmomorphogenesis, and that it represents an adaptation designed to protect plants from the stresses produced by high winds and moving animals. Some evidence indicates that thigmomorphogenesis may be mediated by ethylene.

Keywords

Ethylene Plant Growth Initial Response Mechanical Stimulation Mechanical Stimulus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyer, N.: Modifications de la croissance de la tige de Bryone (Bryonia dioica) à la suite d'irritations tactiles. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 264 ser. D, 2114–2117 (1967)Google Scholar
  2. Burden, R.F., Randerson, P.F.: A quantitative study of human trampling on vegetation as an aid to the management of semi-natural areas. J. Appl. Ecol. 9, 439–458 (1972)Google Scholar
  3. Burg, S.P., Burg, E.A.: Interaction between auxin and ethylene and its role in plant growth. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 55, 262–269 (1966)Google Scholar
  4. Darwin, C.: The power of movement in plants. New York: Appleton 1881Google Scholar
  5. Evans, M., Ray, P.: Timing of the auxin response in coleoptiles and its implications regarding auxin action. J. gen. Physiol. 53, 1–20 (1969)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Holm, R.E., Abeles, F.B.: The role of ethylene in 2,4-D-induced growth inhibition. Planta (Berl.) 78, 293–304 (1968)Google Scholar
  7. Jacobs, M.R.: The effect of wind sway on the form and development of Pinus radiata D. Don. Austr. J. Bot. 2, 35–51 (1954)Google Scholar
  8. Jaffe, M.J.: Physiological studies on pea tendrils. VI. The characteristics of sensory perception and transduction. Plant Physiol. 45, 756–760 (1970)Google Scholar
  9. Jaffe, M.J.: Physiological studies on pea tendrils. VIII. The relationship of circumnutation to contact coiling. With a description of a laboratory intervalometer using integrated digital circuits. Physiologia Plantarum (Cph.) 26, 73–80 (1972)Google Scholar
  10. Jaffe, M.J., Galston, A.W.: Physiological studies on pea tendrils. I. Growth and coiling following mechanical stimulation. Plant Physiol. 41, 1014–1025 (1966)Google Scholar
  11. Jaffe, M.J., Galston, A.W.: The physiology of tendrils. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 19, 417–434 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jaffe, M.J., Isenberg, F.M.R.: Some effects on N-dimethyl amino succinamic acid (B-Nine) on the development of various plants, with special reference to the cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 87, 420–428 (1965)Google Scholar
  13. Milburn, J.A.: Phloem exudation from castor bean: induction by massage. Planta (Berl.) 95, 272–276 (1970)Google Scholar
  14. Milburn, J.A.: An analysis of the response in phloem exudation on application of massage to Ricinus. Planta (Berl.) 100, 143–154 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. Neel, P.L., Harris, R.W.: Motion-induced inhibition of elongation and induction of dormancy in Liquidamber. Science 173, 58–59 (1971)Google Scholar
  16. Pickard, B.G.: Action potentials resulting from mechanical stimulation of pea epicotyls. Planta (Berl.) 97, 106–115 (1971)Google Scholar
  17. Salisbury, F.B.: The flowering process. New York: Macmillan 1963Google Scholar
  18. Sibaoka, T.: Physiology of rapid movements in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 20, 165–184 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Turgeon, R., Webb, J.A.: Growth inhibition by mechanical stress. Science 174, 961–962 (1971)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Jaffe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations