Skip to main content
Log in

Die Bedeutung tagesperiodischer Blattbewegungen für die Präzision der Tageslängenmessung

The importance of circadian leaf movements for the precision of day-length measurement

  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    In Glycine max, the circadian leaf movements are synchronized with the 24 hr period in 12:12 hrs light-dark cycles even with light intensities of only 0.6–0.8 lx. The normal phase-angle difference between light-dark cycle and the circadian rhythm is already nearly reached with intensities of 10 lx.

  2. 2.

    In Phaseolus multiflorus, light with the intensities of moonlight, offered during the dark-period of 12:12 hrs light-dark cycles, is able to shift the phases of the circadian leaf-movement rhythm.

  3. 3.

    In Phaseolus, the transition of the leaves to the night-position reduces the intensity of moonlight reaching the leaf's upper surface to values below the threshold values for phase shifts.

  4. 4.

    The epidermis of the upper leaf surface in Parochetus communis has “ocelli”. The complicated transition of the leaves to their night-position results in a nearly complete darkening of these ocelli.

  5. 5.

    It is concluded that the circadian leaf movements prevent the interference of moonlight with the photoperiodic time measurement. Moreover, the leaf movements result in a very sharp increase or decrease of the light-intensity reaching the leaves' surface in the photoperiodically decisive range (between about 1 and 10 lx) during morning and evening twilight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Bünning, E.: Common features of photoperiodism in plants and animals. Photochem. Photobiol. 9, 219–228 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bünning, E.: and I. Moser: Interference of moonlight with photoperiodic time-measurement, and its prevention. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) (im Druck, 1969).

  • Darwin, Ch., u. F. Darwin: Das Bewegungsvermögen der Pflanzen. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart 1881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberlandt, G.: Die Lichtsinnesorgane der Blätter. Leipzig: W. Engelmann 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kübler, F.: Sychronisations-Phänomene bei der circadianen Rhythmik von Glycine max. Diss. Tübingen 1969.

  • Semon, R.: Über die Erblichkeit der Tagesperiode. Biol. Zbl. 25, 241–252 (1905).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Hat der Rhythmus der Tageszeiten bei Pflanzen erbliche Eindrücke hinterlassen? Biol. Zbl. 28, 225–243 (1908).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, W.: Vererbung “erworbener Eigenschaften” und Auslese, 2. Aufl. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Es werden folgende üblich gewordenen Abkürzungen benutzt: L = Licht, LL = Dauerlicht, D = Dunkel, LD = Licht-Dunkel-Wechsel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bünning, E. Die Bedeutung tagesperiodischer Blattbewegungen für die Präzision der Tageslängenmessung. Planta 86, 209–217 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386453

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386453

Navigation