Abstract
The results of the general Atlas of Health and Working Conditions by Occupation were compared with the results of the Atlas of Health and Working Conditions in the Construction Industry. Both are based on questionnaire data from periodical occupational health surveys [POHSs]. The scores on most of the items showed considerable differences between the two atlases, partly due to differences in the regional origin of the data. Therefore, direct comparisons between the atlases are biased by regional differences. To study the reliability and the generalizability of the results of both atlases, similarities between the data files with respect to occupations in the construction industry were studied. Most of the items on working conditions, especially those with a widespread distribution, showed a close resemblance between the data files in terms of the relative position of an occupation compared to other occupations in the construction industry. The items on health showed less resemblance, except for the items on musculoskeletal complaints, which showed results similar to those of the work items. These results indicate the reliability and generalizability of the judgements based on both atlases outside the regions of origin, as far as items with a widespread distribution are concerned. Therefore, we recommend the aggregation of POHS data on a national scale, taking regional differences into account. In that way, a greater number of occupations will be described and the reliability of the results will be enhanced.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloemhoff A, Gründemann RWM, van Putten DJ (1991) Werk en Gezondheid in de Bouwnijverheid. (Work and health in the construction industry, 2nd edn.) Nederlands Instituut voor Praeventieve Gezondheidszorg TNO, Leiden
Broersen JPJ, Weel ANH, van Dijk FJH (1991) Atlas Gezondheid en Werkbeleving naar Beroep. (The atlas of health and working conditions by occupation.) Nederlands Instituut voor Arbeidsomstandigheden, Amsterdam
Broersen JPJ, Bloemhoff A, Duivenbooden JC, Weel ANH, van Dijk FJH (1992) Atlas Gezondheid en Werkbeleving in de Bouw. (Atlas of health and working conditions in the construction industry.) Coronel Laboratory Study Center Work and Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
Broersen JPJ, Weel ANH, van Dijk FJH, Verbeek JHAM (1995) The atlas of health and working conditions by occupation. l. Occupational ranking lists and occupational profiles from periodical occupational health survey data. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 67:325–335
CBS, Beroepenclassificatie 1984. (Classification of occupations 1984.) CBS, Voorburg
CBS. Statistisch jaarboek 1991. (Statistical yearbook 1991.) SDU uitgeverij. `s-Gravenhage
Kruidenier HJ, Meulenbeld C (1991) Peilstation PBGO in oprichting: verslag van een enquête onder de leden van de Federatie van Gezamenlijke Bedrijfsgezondheidsdiensten. (Information Centre POHS: report of a survey among collective organisations for occupational health services.) Nederlands Instituut voor Arbeidsomstandigheden, Amsterdam
Marcelissen FHG, Grundemann RWM, van Putten DJ (1990) Werk en Gezondheid in de Bouwnijverheid. (Work and health in the construction industry.) Nederlands Instituut voor Praeventieve Gezondheidszorg TNO, Leiden
Meulenbeld C (1991) Peilstation PBGO i.o.: verslag van een enquête onder de enkelvoudige bedrijfsgezondheidsdiensten en basisgezondheidsdiensten in Nederland. (Information Centre POHS: report of a survey among occupational health services and basic health services in the Netherlands.) Nederlands Instituut voor Arbeidsomstandigheden, Amsterdam
van Sonsbeek JLA (1987) Gezondheidsverschillen in regionaal perspectief. (Health differences in a regional perspective.) CBS, Maandbericht Gezondheidsstatistiek, Voorburg
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Broersen, J.P.J., Weel, A.N.H., van Dijk, F.J.H. et al. The Atlas of health and working conditions by occupation. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 67, 337–342 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00385649
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00385649