Skip to main content
Log in

The evolution of hermaphroditism

An experimental test of the resource model

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Most plants are hermaphrodite (cosexual). Charnov et al. (1976) advanced the hypothesis that cosexuality is favoured in plants because a convex fitness set is generated by a non-additive relationship between male and female resource costs. In the first experimental test of this hypothesis, reproductive costs were measured in a male x female factorial design using male, female, cosexual, and neuter cucumber plants. Costs were measured by plant's vegetative growth response to treatments. The results show that male costs in the system used have negligible effect upon plant growth and female function, and imply a convex fitness set, in accordance with Charnov et al.'s model. Female function (fruit set) has an inhibitory effect upon vegetative growth and male flower production, favouring protandry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonovics J (1980) Concepts of resource allocation and partitioning in plants. In: Staddon JER (ed) Limits to action: the allocation of individual behaviour. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Carlson RW (1979) Photosynthetic contribution of flowers and seeds to reproductive effort in an annual colonizer. New Phytol 82:223–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Carlson RW, Harper JL (1979) Contribution to reproductive effort by photosynthesis of flowers and fruits. Nature 279:554–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov E (1982) The theory of sex allocation, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL, Maynard Smith J, Bull J (1976) Why be an hermaphrodite? Nature 263:125–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Denna DW (1973) Effects of genetic parthenocarpy and gyneoecious flowering habit on fruit production and growth of cucumber Cucumus sativus L. J Am Soc Hort Sci 98:602–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard ER (1962) Inter-relations of vegetative and reproductive growth with special reference to indeterminante plants. Bot Rev 28:353–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett Doust J, Eaton GW (1982) Demographic aspects of flower and fruit production in bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris. Am J Bot 69:1156–1164

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1982) Selection of combined versus separate sexes in seed plants. Am Nat 120:571–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCollum JD (1934) Vegetative and reproductive responses associated with fruit development in the cucumber. Cornell Univ Agr Exp Sta Memoir, No 163

  • Silvertown J (1985) Survival, fecundity and growth of wild cucumber, Echinocystis lobata J Ecol 73:841–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner TC, Miller CH (1985) Effect of gynoecious expression on yield and earliness of a fresh-market cucumber hybrid. J Am Soc Hort Sci 110:464–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson MF (1983) Plant reproductive ecology. Wiley, New York Chichester

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silertown, J. The evolution of hermaphroditism. Oecologia 72, 157–159 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00385060

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00385060

Key words

Navigation