, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 185–191 | Cite as

Inflorescence spiders: A cost/benefit analysis for the host plant, Haplopappus venetus Blake (Asteraceae)

  • Svaťa M. Louda
Original Papers


Predators on flower visitors, such as spiders, could influence plant reproduction by determining the balance between pollination and seed predation by insects. This study examines the net effect of predation by the inflorescence spider, Peucetia viridans (Hentz), for seed production by a native plant species on which it hunts. Both pollination and seed set of Haplopappus venetus (Asteraceae) were reduced on branches with spiders; however, the release of viable, undamaged seed was higher on inflorescence branches with spiders than on those without. Occurrence of P. viridans was associated with the flat-topped inflorescence branch structure characteristic of H. venetus rather than with the vertical structure of its congener, H. squarrosus. Thus, the interaction should be a reinforcing selective pressure on inflorescence branch morphology of H. venetus over time. Two factors providing constraints on the degree and rate of coevolution of the plant-spider interaction are suggested by the results: (1) the critical role of phenological synchrony and (2) the opposing requirements of interacting species and of subsequent life history stages within a species.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baker HG, Hurd PD Jr (1968) Intrafloral ecology. Ann Rev Entomol 13:385–414Google Scholar
  2. Bentley BL (1976) Plants bearing extrafloral nectaries and the associated ant community: interhabitat differences in the reduction of herbivore damage. Ecology 57:815–820Google Scholar
  3. Bentley BL (1977) Extrafloral nectaries and protection by pugnacious bodyguards. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 8:407–427Google Scholar
  4. Bohart GE, Koerber TW (1972) Insects and seed production. Pp. 1–50 in TT Kozlowski (ed), Seed Biology, Vol 3. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Brady AR (1964) The lynx spiders of North America north of Mexico (Araneae: Oxyopidae). Bull Mus Comp Zool Harvard Univ 131(13):429–518Google Scholar
  6. Buss LW, Jackson JBC (1979) Competitive networks: nontransitive competitive relationships in cryptic coral reef environments. Amer Nat 113:223–234Google Scholar
  7. Carroll CR, Janzen DH (1973) Ecology of foraging by ants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 4:231–258Google Scholar
  8. Cates RG, Orians GH, Rhoades DF, Schultz JC, Tomoff CS (1977) Resource utilization systems: the plant-foliage eater-predator system. In: GH Orians, OT Solbrig (eds) Convergent evolution in warm deserts, pp 166–196. Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Stroudsburg, PAGoogle Scholar
  9. Comstock JH (1940) The spider book. Doubleday, Doran and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Doris PR (1970) Spiders collected from mud dauber nests in Mississippi. J Kansas Ent Soc 43:10–11Google Scholar
  11. Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1971) The principles of pollination ecology (Second ed). Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Gertsch WJ (1979) American spiders. Van Nostrand, Reinhold Pub, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Givens RP (1978) Dimorphic foraging strategies of a salticid spider (Phidippus audax). Ecology 59:309–321Google Scholar
  14. Greenstone MH (1978) The numerical response to prey availability of Pardosa ramulosa (McCook) (Araneae: Lycosidae) and its relationship to the role of spiders in the balance of nature. Symp Zool Soc Lond 42:183–193Google Scholar
  15. Hallander H (1967) Range and movements of the wolf spiders Pardosa chelata (OF Muller) and P. pullata (Clerck). Oikos 18:360–364Google Scholar
  16. Hallander H (1970) Prey, cannibalism and microhabitat selection in the wolf spiders Pardosa chelata (OF Muller) and P. pullata (Clerck). Oikos 21:337–340Google Scholar
  17. Harper JL (1977) The population biology of plants. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris P (1973) Insects in the population dynamics of plants. In: HF van Emden (ed) Insect/plant relationships, pp 201–210. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Haynes DL, Sisojevic P (1966) Predatory behavior of Philodromus rufus (Araneae: Thomisidae). Can Entomol 98:113–133Google Scholar
  20. Inouye D, Taylor OR (1979) A temperate region plant-ant-seed predator system: consequences of extrafloral nectar secretion by Helianthella guinquenervis. Ecology 60:1–7Google Scholar
  21. Jackson MT (1966) Effects of microclimate on spring flowering phenology. Ecology 47:407–415Google Scholar
  22. Janzen DH (1966) Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acadias in Central America. Evolution 20:249–275Google Scholar
  23. Janzen DH (1967) Fire, vegetation structure, and the ant x acacia interaction in Central America. Ecology 48:26–35Google Scholar
  24. Janzen DH (1971) Seed predation by animals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2:465–492Google Scholar
  25. Janzen DH (1980) When is it coevolution? Evolution 34:611–612Google Scholar
  26. Kessler A (1971) Relation between egg production and food consumption in species of the genus Pardosa (Lycosidae, Araneae) under experimental conditions of food abundance and food shortage. Oecologia (Berl) 8:93–109Google Scholar
  27. Kurczewski FE, Kurczewski EJ (1968) Host records for some North American Pompilidae (Hymenoptera) with discussion of factors in prey selection. J Kansas Entomol Soc 41:1–33Google Scholar
  28. Lamb WO (1980) Predispersal seed predation of the Platte thistle and its effect on seed production. PhD thesis, Univ of Nebraska, 173 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Louda SM (1978) A test of predispersal seed predation in the population dynamics of Haplopappus (Asteraceae). PhD thesis, Univ of California, Riverside and San Diego State University, 185 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Louda SM (1982a) Limitation of the recruitment of the shrub Haplopappus squarrosus (Asteraceae) by flower- and seed-feeding insects. J Ecol 70(1):43–53Google Scholar
  31. Louda SM (1982b) Distribution ecology: variation in plant recruitment over a gradient in relation to insect seed predation. Ecol Monogr 52(1):25–41Google Scholar
  32. Louda SM (1983) Seed predation and seedling mortality in the recruitment of a shrub, Haplopappus ventus Blake (Asteraceae), along a climatic gradient. Ecology: in pressGoogle Scholar
  33. Lowrie DC (1963) Effects of grazing and intensive collecting on a population of the green lynx spider. Ecology 44:777–781Google Scholar
  34. Marden L (1963) The man who talks to hummingbirds. Nat Geographic Mag 123:80–99Google Scholar
  35. McKaye KR (1977) Defense of a predator's young by an herbivorous fish: an unusual strategy. Amer Nat 111:301–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McKaye KR (1979) Defense of a predator's young revisited. Amer Nat 114:595–601Google Scholar
  37. Messina FJ (1981) Plant protection as a consequence of an antmembracid mutualism: interactions on goldenrod (Solidago sp). Ecology 62:1433–1440Google Scholar
  38. Mooney HA (1977) Southern coastal scrub. In: M Barbour and J Major (eds), Terrestrial vegetation of California pp 471–489. Wiley Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Morse DH (1979) Prey capture by the crab spider Misumena calycina (Araneae: Thomisidae). Oecologia (Berl) 39:309–319Google Scholar
  40. Morse DH (1980) Interactions among syrphid flies and bumblebees on flowers. Ecology 62:81–88Google Scholar
  41. Muma MH, Jeffers WF (1945) Studies of the spider prey of several mud-dauber wasps. Ann Ent Soc Amer 38:245–255Google Scholar
  42. Munz P, Keck DD (1959) A California flora. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  43. Olive CW (1980) Foraging specializations in orb-weaving spiders. Ecology 61:1133–1144Google Scholar
  44. Pleasants JM (1980) Competition for bumblebee pollinators in Rocky Mountain plant communities. Ecology 61:1446–1459Google Scholar
  45. Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:41–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richards AJ (1978) The pollination of flowers by insects. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Riechert SE, Tracy CR (1975) Thermal balance and prey availability: basis for a model relating web-site characteristics to spider reproductive success. Ecology 56:265–284Google Scholar
  49. Roughgarden J (1976) Resource partitioning among competing species — a coevolutionary approach. Theor Pop Biol 9:388–424Google Scholar
  50. Salisbury EJ (1942) The reproductive capacity of plants. Bell Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. Skinner GJ, Whittaker JB (1981) An experimental investigation of inter-relationships between the wood-ant (Formica rufa) and some tree-canopy herbivores. J Anim Ecol 50:313–326Google Scholar
  52. Sørenson T (1941) Temperature relations and phenology of the northeast Greenland flowering plants. Medd Grønland 125:1–305Google Scholar
  53. Tilman D (1978) Cherries, ants and tent caterpillars: timing of nectar production in relation to susceptibility of caterpillars to ant predation. Ecology 59:686–692Google Scholar
  54. Turnbull AL (1965) Effects of prey abundance on the development of the spider Agelenopsis potteri (Blackwell) (Araneae: Agelenidae). Can Entomol 97:141–147Google Scholar
  55. Turnbull AL (1972) Ecology of the true spiders (Araneomorphae). Ann Rev Entomol 18:305–348Google Scholar
  56. Waser NM (1978) Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59:934–944Google Scholar
  57. Whitcomb WH, Hite M, Eason R (1966) Life history of the green lynx spider, Peucetia viridans (Araneida: Oxyopidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 39:259–267Google Scholar
  58. Whittaker JB (1979) Invertebrate grazing, competition and plant dynamics. In: RM Anderson, BD Turner, LR Taylor (eds) Population dynamics, pp 207–222. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  59. Wise DH (1975) Food limitation of the spider Linyphia marginata: experimental field studies. Ecology 56:637–646Google Scholar
  60. Wise DH (1979) Effects of an experimental increase in prey abundance upon the reproductive rates of two orb-weaving spider species (Araneae: Araneidae). Oecologia (Berl) 41:289–300Google Scholar
  61. Zimmerman M (1980a) Reproduction in Polemonium: competition for pollinators. Ecology 61:497–501Google Scholar
  62. Zimmerman M (1980b) Reproduction in Polemonium: pre-dispersal seed predation. Ecology 61:502–506Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Svaťa M. Louda
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Duke UniversityBeaufortUSA

Personalised recommendations