Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 395–402 | Cite as

Origins of variance in seed number and mass: interaction of sex expression and herbivory in Lomatium salmoniflorum

  • John N. Thompson
  • Olle Pellmyr
Article

Summary

As in many plant species, Lomatium salmoniflorum (Umbelliferae) individuals produce many flowers, only a subset of which produce mature seeds that escape seed parasitism and enter the seed bank. The interrelationships between the timing and number of flowers produced, sex expression, seed set, and seed parasitism were studied for their direct and indirect effects on the numbers and masses of viable seeds produced by individual plants. In a sample population of 369 plants that produced 161 386 flowers, 76% of the plants produced some hermaphroditic flowers. The percentage of hermaphroditic flowers increased significantly with the total number of flowers produced by a plant. Seed set was 65–90% in plants producing >600 flowers, but was highly variable in plants producing fewer flowers. Hand-pollinated plants showed the same pattern of seed set, suggesting that variable seed set in small plants may result from insufficient resources for seed development. The majority of schizocarps was produced by only 12% of the plants. Parasites killed 24.5% of the seeds prior to dispersal. Another 14.5% of the seeds lacked endosperm. Hence, the initial 161 386 flowers, which included 25874 hermaphroditic flowers each capable of producing two seeds, produced 42 468 seeds of which an estimated 25906 entered the seed bank as undamaged seeds with fully developed endosperm. Path analysis indicated that the number of hermaphroditic flowers on a plant and the percentage of seeds attacked by seed parasites had the greatest direct effects on the number of viable seeds entering the seed bank. The date at which a plant began flowering and the percentage of flowers setting seed had smaller or only indirect effects on viable seed production. Mean seed mass for plants was not significantly related to any of the factors that affected seed number, but little of the variance in seed mass occurred among plants. Masses of intact seeds in the population ranged 9-fold in both 1987 and 1988. Thirty-five percent of the variance was among seeds within umbels, 46% was among umbels within plants, and only 19% was among plants. The large variation among umbels within plants resulted from a seasonal pattern in which seeds from umbels produced late in the spring had lower mean seed masses than seeds from umbels produced early in the spring. Overall, the results indicate that both direct and indirect interactions between number of flowers, the date of initiation of flowering, seed set, and seed parasitism affect the number of viable seeds entering the seed bank. These interactions strongly bias viable seed output to a small minority of plants that produce many seeds with a wide range of masses over the growing season.

Key words

Andromonoecy Lomatium salmoniflorum Seed parasitism Smicronyx Umbelliferae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antonovics J, Schmitt J (1986) Paternal and maternal effects on propagule size in Anthoxanthum odoratum. Oecologia 69:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazzaz FA (1984) Demographic consequences of plant physiological traits: some case studies. In: Dirzo, R, Sarukhán (eds) Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sinauer Associates, New York, pp 324–346Google Scholar
  3. Bierzychudek P (1984) Determinants of gender in Jack-in-the-pulpit: the influence of plant size and reproductive history. Oecologia 65:14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavers PB, Steel MG (1984) Patterns of change in seed weight over time on individual plants. Am Nat 124:324–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawley MJ, Nachapong M (1985) The establishment of seedlings from primary and regrowth seeds of ragwort (Senecio jacobaea). J Ecol 73:255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daubenmire R (1970) Steppe vegetation of Washington. Wash Agric Exp Station Tech Bull 62. 131 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellison RL, Thompson JN (1987) Variation in seed and seedling size: the effects of seed herbivores on Lomatium grayi (Umbelliferae). Oikos 49:269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gray D, Steckel JRA (1985) Parsnip (Pastinaca sativa) seed production: effects of seed crop, plant density, seed position on the mother plant harvest date and method, and seed grading on embryo and seed size and seedling performance. Ann Appl Biol 107:559–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harder LD, Thomson JD, Cruzan MB, Unnasch RS (1985) Sexual reproduction and variation in floral morphology in an ephemeral vernal lily, Erythronium americanum. Oecologia 67:286–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Hendrix SD (1984) Reactions of Heracleum lanatum to floral herbivory by Depressaria pastinacella. Ecology 65:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horvitz CC, Schemske DW (1988) A test of the pollinator limitation hypothesis for a neotropical herb. Ecology 69:200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Howe HF, Richter WM (1982) Effects of seed size on seedling size in Virola surinamensis; a within and between tree analysis. Oecologia 53:347–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Janzen DH (1977) Variation in seed weight in Costa Rican Cassia grandis (Leguminosae) Trop Ecol 18:177–186Google Scholar
  15. Li CC (1975) Path analysis — a primer. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, CA 93950Google Scholar
  16. Lloyd D (1980) The distributions of gender in four angiosperms illustrating two evolutionary pathways to dioecy. Evolution 33:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Louda SM (1982a) Limitation of the recruitment of the shrub Haplopappus squarrosus (Asteraceae) by flower- and seed-feeding insects. Journal of Ecology 70:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Louda SM (1982b) Distribution ecology: variation in plant recruitment over a gradient in relation to insect seed predation. Ecol Monogr 52:25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lovett Doust J, Harper J (1980) The resource costs of gender and maternal support in an andromonoecious umbellifer, Smyrnium olusatrum L. New Phytol 85:251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marshall DL, Levin DA, Fowler NL (1985) Plasticity in yield components in response to fruit predation and data of fruit initiation in three species of Sesbania (Leguminosae). J Ecol 73:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mathias M (1965) Distribution patterns of uncertain Umbelliferae. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 15:91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mazer SJ (1987) The quantitative genetics of life history and fitness components in Raphanus raphanistrum L. (Brassicaceae): ecological and evolutionary consequences of seed-weight variation. Am Nat 130:891–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pellmyr O (1987) Temporal patterns of ovule allocation, fruit set, and seed predation in Anemonopsis macrophylla (Ranunculaceae). Bot Mag, Tokyo 100:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pyke DA (1986) Demographic responses of Bromus tectorum and seedlings of Agropyron spicatum to grazing by small mammals: occurrence and severity of grazing. J Ecol 74:739–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roach DA (1986) Life history variation in Geranium carolinianum. 1. Covariation between characters at different stages of the life cycle. Am Nat 128:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. SAS Institute Inc (1985) SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  27. Schemske DW, Paulter LP (1984) The effects of pollen competition on fitness components in a neotropical herb. Oecologia 62:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schlessman MA (1982) Expression of andromonoecy and pollination of tuberous lomatiums (Umbelliferae). Syst Bot 7:134–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Simes RJ (1986) An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 73:751–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stanton ML (1984) Seed variation in wild radish: effect of seed size on components on seedling and adult fitness. Ecology 65:1105–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thompson JN (1978) Within-patch structure and dynamics in Pastinaca sativa and resource availability to a specialized herbivore. Ecology 59:443–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thompson JN (1982) Interaction and coevolution. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Thompson JN (1983a) The use of ephemeral plant parts on small host plants: how Depressaria leptotaeniae (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae) feeds on Lomatium dissectum (Umbelliferae). J Anim Ecol 52:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thompson JN (1983b) Selection on plant parts by Depressaria multifidae (Lep., Oecophoridae) on its seasonally-restricted hostplant, Lomatium grayi (Umbelliferae). Ecol Ent 8:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thompson JN (1984) Variation among individual seed masses in Lomatium grayi (Umbelliferae) under controlled conditions: magnitude and partitioning of the variance. Ecology 65:626–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thompson JN (1985) Postdispersal seed predation in Lomatium (Umbelliferae): variation among individuals and species. Ecology 66:1608–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson JN (1987a) The ontogeny of flowering and sex expression in divergent populations of Lomatium grayi. Oecologia 72:605–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson JN (1987b) Variance in number of eggs per patch: oviposition behaviour and population dispersion in a seed parasitic moth. Ecol Ent 12:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thompson JN, Moody ME (1985) Assessing probability of interaction in size-structured populations: Depressaria attack on Lomatium. Ecology 66:1597–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willson MF (1983) Plant reproductive ecology. Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  41. Willson MF, Burley N (1983) Mate choice in plants: tactic, mechanisms and consequences. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  42. Wulff RD (1986) Seed size variation in Desmodium paniculatum. I. Factors affecting seed size. J Ecol 74:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zimmerman M (1980) Reproduction in Polemonium: pre-dispersal seed predation. Ecology 61:502–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zimmerman M, Pyke GH (1988) Reproduction in Polemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. Am Nat 131:723–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • John N. Thompson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Olle Pellmyr
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BotanyWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations