Skip to main content
Log in

A new technique for monitoring pollen flow in orchids

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The orchid Prasophyllum fimbria is pollinated by nectar-feeding native bees and wasps. The pollinia are patially separated from the viscidium by a stipe so that pollinia can be labelled with coloured histochemical stains without interfering with pollinarium removal. Pollen flow was monitored by following the movement of the coloured pollen in several populations of P. fimbria in Western Australia. Statistical analysis confirmed that pollen labelling did not interfere with pollinarium removal or subsequent pollination of the labelled flower. Fifty eight labelled pollinaria were removed by vectors from 16 test spikes, with a total of 125 flowers on 47 spikes receiving labelled pollen. An average of 2 flowers received pollen for every pollinium removed but up to 6 flowers received pollen from a single collinium. No significant differences between mean vector flights and pollen flow distances were detected. On average, geitonogamous transfers only accounted for 22% of all pollinations. This is a simple and inexpensive technique for the direct labelling of pollen with minimal disruption to the pollination system and may have applications in other plant families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campbell DR (1985) Pollen and gene dispersal: The influences of competition for pollination. Evol 39:418–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RN (1951) The use of radioactive isotopes in determining spore distribution patterns. Am J Bot 38:511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handel SN (1976) Restricted pollen flow of two woodland herbs determined by neutron-activation analysis. Nature 260:422–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handel SN (1982) Dynamics of gene flow in an experimental garden of Cucumis melo (Cucurbitaceae). Am J Bot 69:1538–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handel SN (1983a) Pollination ecology, plant population structure, and gene flow. In Real L (ed) Pollination Biology, Academic Press, New York, pp 163–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel SN (1983b) Contrasting gene flow patterns and genetic subdivision in adjacent populations of Cucumis sativus (Cucurbitaceae). Evol 37:760–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1981) Dispersal versus gene flow in plants. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 68:233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Kerster HW (1974) Gene flow in seed plants. Evol Biol 7:139–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linhart YB (1973) Ecological and behavioural determinants of pollen dispersal in hummingbird pollinated Heliconia. Am Nat 197:511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linhart YB, Feinsinger P (1980) Plant-hummingbird interactions: Effects of island size and degree of specialization on pollination. J Ecol 68:745–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murawski DA, Gilbert LE (1986) Pollen flow in Psiguria warscewiczii a comparison of Heliconius butterflies and hummingbirds. Oecologia 68:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R (1987) Genetic Systems of Australian Terrestrial Orchids. Ph D thesis University of Western Australia.

  • Price MV, Waser NM (1982) Experimental studies of pollen carryover: Hummingbirds and Ipomopsis aggregata. Oceologia 54:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards AJ, Ibrahim H (1978) Estimation of neighbourhood size in two populations of Primula veris. In Richards AJ (Ed) The Pollination of Flowers by Insects. Academic Press, London pp 165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlising RA, Turpin RA (1971) Hummingbird dispersal of Delphinium cardinale pollen treated with radioactive iodine. Amer J Bot 58:401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J (1980) Pollinator foraging behaviour and gene dispersal in Senecio (Compositae). Evol 34:934–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD (1986) Pollen transport and deposition by bumble bees in Erythronium influences of floral nectar and bee grooming. J Ecol 74:329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Plowright RC (1980) Pollen carry over, nectar rewards, and pollinator behaviour with special reference to Diervilla lonicera. Oceologia 46:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Price MV, Waser NM, Stratton DA (1986) Comparative studies of pollen and fluorescent dye transport by bumble bees visiting Erythronium grandiflorum. Oecologia 69:561–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM (1988) Comparative pollen and dye transfer by pollinators of Delphinium nelsonii. Functional Ecology 2:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV (1982) A comparison of pollen and fluorescent dye carryover by natural pollinators of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Ecology 63:1168–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV (1983) Optimal and actual outcrossing in plants, and the nature of plant pollinator interaction. In Jones CE, Little RJ (Eds) Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. Scientific & Academic, New York pp 341–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb CJ, Bawa KS (1983) Pollen dispersal by hummingbirds and butterflies: A comparative study of two lowland tropical plants. Evol 37:258–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peakall, R. A new technique for monitoring pollen flow in orchids. Oecologia 79, 361–365 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384315

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384315

Key words

Navigation