Skip to main content
Log in

Demography and competition in Hyrax

A 17 years study

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study investigates the demography and interspecific interactions of 6 Heterohyrax brucei and 4 Procavia johnstoni populations, which inhabited 6 kopjes (rock outcrops) in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania over a period of 17 years. On three kopjes (H1, O2 and PH2) both species lived sympatrically, while on the other three (H2, H3 and P1) either one or the other species occurred allopatrically. The rainfall pattern between 1971/1972 and 1981/1982 had undergone major changes. There was significantly less precipitation in the wet season and the dry season had become extremer and longer. The kopje vegetation, recorded as percentage crown cover of browse from bushes and trees, had changed also, decreasing between 1971/72 and 1982 on 5 kopjes. In three kopjes (H1, O2 and PH2), which were shared by both hyrax species, an increase in the number of P. johnstoni, a decrease (H1 and O2) and extinction (PH2) of H. brucei took place between the time periods 1971–1976 (“good browse years”) and 1982–1984 (“poor browse years”). These changes are probably the result of indirect interspecific competition (exploitative competition) for browse material, which is the main food source for both species during the dry season. When the browsing resources are abundant coexistence on sympatric kopjes between both species is possible, but when browse is scarce the result is competitive exclusion of H. brucei by P. johnstoni. It is also argued, that P. johnstoni by being the larger species and by also being a grazer had several ecological advantages over H. brucei. In kopjes H2, H3 and P1 where H. brucei occurred allopatrically the population increased (H2, P1) or decreased (H3) during the same time period. Natural extinction was observed in kopje P1 in the allopatrically living P. johnstoni group through mange. Dispersal of 7 females and 7 males H. brucei as well as 1 female and 4 male P. johnstoni were recorded in kopjes H1, H2 and P1. One female H. brucei that immigrated successfully into kopje H2 reached an age of over 11 years. One H. brucei family group (H2) shifted its birth season from December–January to May–August. Successful natural colonization was recorded for H. brucei in kopje P1 and for P. johnstoni in H1. Two kopjes (PH2 and H3), which had no hyrax and are located far away from other hyrax populations, were experimentally colonized in 1971 and 1972 respectively. The P. Johnstoni on PH2 and the H. brucei group on H3 had been under breeding isolation for 16 years. Under such conditions P. johnstoni males can reach an age of over 8.5 years. These long-term observations have shown that the occupancy of the kopjes by both species is a dynamic process depending on the combination of several abiotic (rainfall and availability of holes and hiding places) and biotic factors (interspecific and intraspecific competition for food, interspecific cooperation, predation and parasites) as well as the degree of inbreeding dependent on the geographic isolation of the kopje.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belovsky GE (1986) Generalist herbivore foraging and its role in competitive interactions. Am Zool 26:51–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Grown JH, Maurer BA (1986) Body size, ecological dominance and Cope's rule. Nature (London) 324:248–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM, Alawi RM (1985) Comparative aspects of behavioural development in two species of free-living hyrax. Behaviour 95:87–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson PL, Case TJ (1985) Overview: Nonequilibrium Community Theories: Chance, Variability, History, and Coexistence. In: Diamond JM, Case TJ (eds) Community Ecology Harper & Row. pp 229–239

  • Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: Evidence from field experiments. Am Nat 122:661–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor RC, Norris KS (1982) Are Dolphins reciprocal altruists? Am Nat 119:358–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1978) Carbon Isotopic evidence for different feeding patterns in two hyrax species occupying the same habitat. Science 201:906–908

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR (1986) An experimental manipulation of the intensity of interspecific competition: effects on a small marsupial. Oecologia 70:536–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR (1988) Body size, prey size, and community structure in insectivorous mammals. Ecology 69(3):569–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartlan JS, Struhsaker TT (1972) Polyspecific associations and niche separation of rainforest anthropoids in Cameroon, West Africa. J Zool 168:221–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR (1972) Interspecific competition among rodents. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 3:79–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR (1978) Dispersal in relation to carrying capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:2854–2858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28:1140–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeck HN (1975) Differential feeding behaviour of the sympatric hyrax Procavia johnstoni and Heterohyrax brucei. Oecologia 22:15–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeck HN (1978a) Systematics of the Hyracoidea: towards a clarification. In ecology and taxonomy of African small mammals. Bull Carnegie Mus Nat Hist, Pittsburgh 6:146–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeck HN (1978b) Heterohyrax brucei (Procaviidae) young playing with each other and with young Procavia johnstoni. Film E2473 of the Inst Wiss Film, Göttingen 1978. Publ. by HN Hoeck, Publ Wiss Film Sek Biol Ser 11, No 29/E2473. 8S

  • Hoeck HN (1982) Population dynamics, dispersal and genetic isolation in two species of Hyrax (Heterohyrax brucei and Procavia johnstoni) on habitat islands in the Serengeti. Z Tierpsych 59:177–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeck HN, Klein H, Hoeck P (1982) Flexible social organization in Hyrax. Z Tierpsych 59:265–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman P (1974) The social organization of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48:215–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine SH (1976) Competitive interactions in ecosystems. Am Nat 110:903–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Arthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) Island Biogeography. Monographs in Population Biology 1. Princeton: University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab BK (1980) Food habits energetics and the population biology of mammals. Am Nat 116:106–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1985) Ecology of a grazing ecosystem: the Serengeti. Ecol Monogr 55:259–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1988) How many species are there on earth? Science 241:1441–1449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • May RM, Seger J (1986) Ideas in Ecology. Am Sci 74:256–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore J, Ali R (1984) Are dispersal and inbreeding avoidance related? Anim Behav 32:94–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton-Griffiths M, Herlocker D, Pennycuick L (1975) The patterns of rainfall in the Serengeti Ecosystem, Tanzania. E Afr Wildl J 13:347–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Harvey PH (1988) The ecological context of life history evolution. Science 241:1449–1455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1986) Niche expansion and contraction in a variable environment. Am Zool 26:71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1987) Community diversity: Relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 235:167–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (1983) Competition and theory in community ecology. Am Nat 122:583–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1986) Mechanistic approaches to community ecology: a new reductionism? Am Zool 26:81–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE (1979) The Serengeti Environment. In: Serengeti. Dynamics of an Ecosystem, 2:31–45. Sinclair, ARE, Norton-Griffiths M (eds) Chicago: University Press 2:31–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE, Norton-Griffiths M (1979) Serengeti. Dynamics of an Ecosystem. Chicago: University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J (1983) Five new World primates. A study in comparative ecology. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology. Princeton: University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1987) The importance of the mechanisms of interspecific competition. Am Nat 129:769–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesey-FitzGerald DF (1960) Grazing succession among East African game animals. J Mamm 41:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker A, Hoeck HN, Perez L (1978) Microwear of mammalian teeth as an indicator of diet. Science 201:908–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waser PM (1985) Does competition drive dispersal? Ecology 66:1170–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widdowson EM (1976) The responses of the sexes to nutritional stress. Proc Nutr Soc 35:175–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1977) On competition and variable environments. Am Sci 65:590–597

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

SWRC publication No. 448

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoeck, H.N. Demography and competition in Hyrax. Oecologia 79, 353–360 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384314

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384314

Key words

Navigation