Skip to main content
Log in

On strict and facultative biennials

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Most so-called biennial plants may flower in their second growing season, but usually take longer in the field. Work reported here and in four recent papers on six different species has identified natural populations of strictly biennial plants, which flower only in their second year. The strict biennials and facultative biennials seem to form two distinct groups. All six strict biennial species were growing in infertile sites, and at least four of the six have annual variants at other sites, so they may be regarded as ‘extended annuals’ growing in sites too infertile for the life cycle to be completed in one year. In contrast most facultative biennials are pauciennials (short-lived monocarpic perennials) of more fertile, disturbed habitats. Moreover, the rigid two-year life cycle of the strict biennials creates at each site two temporally separated sub-populations, which flower in odd and even years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Borg SJ ter (1979) Some topics in plant population biology. In Werger MJA (ed) The Study of Vegetation. Junk, the Hague, pp 11–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg SJ ter, Janse A, Kwak MM (1980) Life cycle variation in Pedicularis palustris. Acta Bot Neerl 29:397–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw ME, Doody JP (1978) Plant population studies and their relevance to nature conservation. Biol Conserv 14:223–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross KL, Werner PA (1982) Colonizing abilities of ‘biennial» plant species in relation to ground cover: implications for their distributions in a successional sere. Ecology 63:921–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross KL (1984) Effects of seed size and growth form on seedling establishment of six monocarpic perennial plants. J Ecol 72:369–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb PJ, Kelly D, Mitchley J (1982) The control of relative abundance in communities of herbaceous plants. In: Newman EI (ed) The Plant Community as a Working Mechanism. (Special Publication No. 1 of the British Ecological Society, Blackwell, Oxford, 1982). pp 79–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population Biology of Plants. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart R (1977) Why are biennials so few? Am Nat 111:792–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly D (1984) Seeds per fruit as a function of fruits per plant in ‘depauperate’ annuals and biennials. New Phytol 96:103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly D (1985) Why are biennials so maligned? Am Nat 125:473–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemow KM, Raynal DJ (1981) Population ecology of Melilotus alba in a limestone quarry. J Ecol 69:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijden E van der, Waals-Kooi RE van der (1979) The population ecology of Senecio jacobaea in a sand dune system. I Reproductive strategy and the biennial habit. J Ecol 67:131–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard NM (1972) Where have all the gentians gone? Trans Proc Bot Soc Edinb 41:279–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenkeveld AJM, Verkaar HJPA (1984) On the ecology of shortlived forbs in chalk grassland. PhD thesis, Utrecht

  • Silvertown JW (1983) Why are biennials sometimes not so few? Am Nat 121:448–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown JW (1984) Death of the elusive biennial. Nature 310:271

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HB (1927) Annual versus biennial growth habit and its inheritance in Melilotus alba. Am J Bot 14:129–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Tevis L (1958) Germination and growth of ephemerals induced by sprinkling a sandy desert. Ecology 39:681–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (1964–1980) Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zijlstra G (1974) Variabiliteit bij Linum catharticum L. in Nederland. Contactblad voor Oecologen 10:10–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, D. On strict and facultative biennials. Oecologia 67, 292–294 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384302

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384302

Keywords

Navigation