Summary
Most so-called biennial plants may flower in their second growing season, but usually take longer in the field. Work reported here and in four recent papers on six different species has identified natural populations of strictly biennial plants, which flower only in their second year. The strict biennials and facultative biennials seem to form two distinct groups. All six strict biennial species were growing in infertile sites, and at least four of the six have annual variants at other sites, so they may be regarded as ‘extended annuals’ growing in sites too infertile for the life cycle to be completed in one year. In contrast most facultative biennials are pauciennials (short-lived monocarpic perennials) of more fertile, disturbed habitats. Moreover, the rigid two-year life cycle of the strict biennials creates at each site two temporally separated sub-populations, which flower in odd and even years.
References
Borg SJ ter (1979) Some topics in plant population biology. In Werger MJA (ed) The Study of Vegetation. Junk, the Hague, pp 11–55
Borg SJ ter, Janse A, Kwak MM (1980) Life cycle variation in Pedicularis palustris. Acta Bot Neerl 29:397–405
Bradshaw ME, Doody JP (1978) Plant population studies and their relevance to nature conservation. Biol Conserv 14:223–242
Gross KL, Werner PA (1982) Colonizing abilities of ‘biennial» plant species in relation to ground cover: implications for their distributions in a successional sere. Ecology 63:921–931
Gross KL (1984) Effects of seed size and growth form on seedling establishment of six monocarpic perennial plants. J Ecol 72:369–387
Grubb PJ, Kelly D, Mitchley J (1982) The control of relative abundance in communities of herbaceous plants. In: Newman EI (ed) The Plant Community as a Working Mechanism. (Special Publication No. 1 of the British Ecological Society, Blackwell, Oxford, 1982). pp 79–97
Harper JL (1977) Population Biology of Plants. Academic, New York
Hart R (1977) Why are biennials so few? Am Nat 111:792–799
Kelly D (1984) Seeds per fruit as a function of fruits per plant in ‘depauperate’ annuals and biennials. New Phytol 96:103–114
Kelly D (1985) Why are biennials so maligned? Am Nat 125:473–479
Klemow KM, Raynal DJ (1981) Population ecology of Melilotus alba in a limestone quarry. J Ecol 69:33–44
Meijden E van der, Waals-Kooi RE van der (1979) The population ecology of Senecio jacobaea in a sand dune system. I Reproductive strategy and the biennial habit. J Ecol 67:131–153
Pritchard NM (1972) Where have all the gentians gone? Trans Proc Bot Soc Edinb 41:279–291
Schenkeveld AJM, Verkaar HJPA (1984) On the ecology of shortlived forbs in chalk grassland. PhD thesis, Utrecht
Silvertown JW (1983) Why are biennials sometimes not so few? Am Nat 121:448–453
Silvertown JW (1984) Death of the elusive biennial. Nature 310:271
Smith HB (1927) Annual versus biennial growth habit and its inheritance in Melilotus alba. Am J Bot 14:129–146
Tevis L (1958) Germination and growth of ephemerals induced by sprinkling a sandy desert. Ecology 39:681–688
Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (1964–1980) Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Zijlstra G (1974) Variabiliteit bij Linum catharticum L. in Nederland. Contactblad voor Oecologen 10:10–14
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelly, D. On strict and facultative biennials. Oecologia 67, 292–294 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384302
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384302