Summary
The home range of the desert scorpion Paruroctonus mesaensis is analyzed using techniques of Ford & Krumme (1979). Possible factors influencing home range geomtry of P. mesaensis include prey distribution, prey abundance and renewal, energy requirements, risk of predation and body size. There are differences in home range size among the three year classes with the youngest year class maintaining a significantly smaller home range. Home ranges of each year class are approximately circular indicating that these scorpions are remarkably symmetric in the directional use of space around their burrow. The majority of surface activity occurs within 1.0 m from the burrow for all ages. These patterns along with equal probabilities of prey capture at all distances from the burrow suggest that scorpions do not deplete prey within their home ranges.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson M (1978) Optimal foraging area: size and an allocation of search effort. Theor Pop Biol 13:397–409
Aronson RB, Givnish TJ (1983) Optimal central-place foragers: a comparison with null hypotheses. Ecology 64:395–399
Baker RR (1983) Insect territoriality. Ann Rev Entomol 28:65–89
Brown JL, Orians GH (1970) Spacing patterns in mobile animals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1:239–262
Brownell P, Farley RD (1979) Prey-localizing behavior of the nocturnal desert scorpion, Paruroctonus mesaensis: orientation to substrate vibrations. Anim Beh 27:185–193
Burt WH (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J Mammal 24:346–352
Covich AP (1976) Analyzing shapes of foraging areas: some ecological and economic theories. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 7:235–257
Dixon KR, Chapman JA (1980) Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas. Ecology 61:1040–1044
Don BAC, Rennolls K (1983) A home range model incorporating biological attraction points. J Anim Ecol 52:69–81
Ford RG (1983) Home range in a patchy environment: optimal foraging predictions. Amer Zool 23:315–326
Ford RG, Krumme DW (1979) The analysis of space used patterns. J Theor Biol 76:125–155
Getty T (1981a) Analysis of central-place space use patterns: the clastic disc revisted. Ecology 62:907–914
Getty T (1981b) Territorial behavior of eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus): encounter avoidance and spatial time-sharing. Ecology 62:915–921
Harestad AS, Bunnell FL (1979) Home range and body weight — a reevaluation. Ecology 60:389–402
McNab BK (1963) Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. Amer Natur 97:133–141
Mace GM, Harvey PH (1983) Energetic constraints on home range size. Amer Natur 121:120–132
Martindale S (1982) Nest defense and central place foraging: a model and experiment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:85–89
Orians GH, Pearson NE (1979) On the theory of central place foraging. In: Analysis of ecological systems. DJ Horn, R Mitchell, GR Stair (eds) pp 155–177. Columbus, Ohio, Ohio State University Press
Polis GA (1979) Diet and prey phenology of the desert scorpion Paruroctonus mesaensis Stahnke. J Zoology (London) 188:333–346
Polis GA (1980a) The significance of cannibalism on the population dynamics and surface activity of a natural population of desert scorpions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:25–35
Polis GA (1980b) Seasonal patterns and age specific variation in the surface activity of a population of desert scorpions in relation to environmental factors. J Anim Ecol 49:1–18
Polis GA (in press) Ecology of scorpions. In: G Polis (ed), Biology of scorpions. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto
Polis GA, Farley RF (1979) Characteristics and environmental determinants of natality, growth and maturity in a natural population of the desert scorpion Paruroctonus mesaensis Stahnke. J Zoology (London) 187:517–542
Polis GA, Farley RF (1980) Population biology of a desert scorpion: survivorship, microhabitat and the evolution of life history strategy. Ecology 61:620–629
Polis GA, McCormick SJ (in press) Scorpions, spiders and solpugids: predation and competition among distantly related taxa. Oecologia (Berlin)
Polis GA, Myers CA, Quinlin M, (in press) Burrowing biology and spatial distribution of desert scorpions. J Arid Envir
Polis GA, Sissom WD, McCormick SJ (1981) Predators of scorpions: field data and a review. J Arid Env 4:309–327
Riechert SE (1978) Energy-based territoriality in populations of the desert spider Agelenopsis aporta (Gertsch). Symp Zool Soc Lond 42:211–222
Schoener TW (1968) Size of feeding territories among birds. Ecology 49:123–141
Schoener TW (1969) Models of optimal size for solitary predators. Amer Natur 103:277–313
Schoener TW (1979) Generality of the size-distance relation in models of optimal feeding. Amer Natur 114:902–914
Schoener TW, Schoener A (1982) Intraspecific variation in home range size in some Anolis lizards. Ecology 63:809–823
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd ed Freeman, San Francisco, CA
Stahnke H (1972) UV light, a useful field tool. Bio Sci 22:604–607
Turner FB, Jennrich RI, Weintraub JD (1969) Home ranges and body sizes of lizards. Ecology 50:1076–1081
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Polis, G.A., McReynolds, C.N. & Ford, R.G. Home range geometry of the desert scorpion Paruroctonus mesaensis . Oecologia 67, 273–277 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384298
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384298