Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental analyses of competition between two species of bumble bees (Hymenoptera: apidae)

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Dynamical aspects of flower usage and forager body size in sympatric and experimentally-induced allopatric populations of Bombus flaviforns and Bombus rufocinctus were studied in 10 discrete subalpine meadows and over the last half of one summer. Results indicate that there is a high degree of asymmetry in the competitive effects and that B. flavifrons is the clear competitive and numerical dominant. When occurring alone, B. rufocinctus used the same spectrum of flowers in similar frequencies to that of B. flavifrons whose flower use was invariant over all meadows and treatments. When sympatric with B. flavifrons, B. rufocinctus was relegated to secondary, less preferred flowers. Shifts in flower use by B. rufocinctus were accompanied by changes in forager body-size: body weights were greater in allopatric populations of B. rufocinctus and smaller in those sympatric with B. flavifrons. Competitive dominance may be related to differences in species phenologies. Bombus flavifrons initiated colonies in the spring three weeks before B. rufocinctus and maintained higher densities over the summer; by virtue of greater numbers of foragers, it may control exploitation of the most profitable flowers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramsky Z, Bowers MA, Rosenzweig ML (1985) Detecting interspecific competition in the field: testing the model of Hallett and Pimm. Oikos (In press)

  • Anasiewicz A (1971) Observations on the bumble bees in Lublin. Ekol Pol 19:401–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender EA, Case TJ, Gilpin ME (1984) Perturbation experiments in community ecology. Ecology 65:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MA (1984) Population biology of bumble bees (Bombus) in subalpine meadows in northeastern Utah. PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MA (1985) Bumble bee colonization, extinction and reproduction in subalpine meadows n northeastern Utah. Ecology 66:914–927

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian AD (1951) Brood development in Bombus agrorum (Hym. Bombidae) Entomological Mon Mag 87:207–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian AD (1954) The foraging of bumble bees I. Foraging behavior. Bee World 35:61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian AD (1957) Differences in the flowers visited by four species of bumble bees and their causes. J Anim Ecol 26:71–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody ML, Diamond JM (1975) Ecology and Evolution of Communities. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am Natur 122:661–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumber RA (1953) Some aspects of the biology and ecology of bumble bees bearing upon the yields of red clover seed in New Zealand. New Zealand J Sci Tech Bull 34:227–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Free JB, Butler CG (1959) Bumble bees. Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselrot TB (1960) Studies on Swedish bumble bees. Opuscula Entomol Suppl 17:1–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1976a) Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: bumble bees. Ecology 57:874–889

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1976b) Foraging specialization of individual bumble bees. Ecol Mono 46:105–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979a) “Majoring” and “minoring” by foraging bumble bees, Bombus vagans: an experimental analysis. Ecology 60:245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979b) Bumble bee economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye D (1978) Resource partitioning in bumble bees: experimental studies of foraging behavior. Ecology 59:672–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye D (1980) The effect of proboscis and corolla tube lengths on pattern and rates of flower visitation of bumble bees. Oecologia 45:197–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg H, Ranta E (1980) Habitat and food utilization in a subarctic bumble bee community. Oikos 35:303–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH (1977) Resource partitioning in bumble bees: the role of behavioral factors. Science 197:678–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants JM (1981) Bumble bee responses to variation in nectar availability. Ecology 62:1648–1661

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1979) Optimal foraging in bumble bees: rule of movement between flowers within inflorescences. Anim Behav 27:1167–1181

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1982) Local geographic distributions of bumble bees near Crested Butte, Colorado: competition and community structure. Ecology 63:555–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E, Lundberg H (1980) Resource partitioning in bumble bees: the significance of differences in proboscis length. Oikos 35:298–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E, Vepsäläinen K (1981) Why are there so many species? Spatiotemporal heterogeneity and northern bumble bee communities. Oikos 36:28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E, Lundberg H, Teras I (1981) Patterns of resource utilization in two Fennoscandian bumble bee communities. Oikos 36:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw Hill, New York, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR (1983) Natural variability and the manifold mechanisms of ecological communities. Am Natur 122:636–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson BG, Lundberg H (1977) Distribution of bumble bee nests in subalpine/alpine areas in relation to altitude and habitat (Hymenoptera, Apidae) Zoon 5:63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington KD, Heinrich B (1981) Patterns of movement and floral choice by foraging bees. In: Kamil AC, Sargent TD (eds) Foraging Behavior: Ecological, Ethological, and Physiological approaches. Garland STPM Press, New York, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitham TG (1977) Coevolution of foraging in Bombus and nectar dispersing in Chilopsis: a last dreg theory. Science 197:593–595

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowers, M.A. Experimental analyses of competition between two species of bumble bees (Hymenoptera: apidae). Oecologia 67, 224–230 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384289

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384289

Keywords

Navigation