Skip to main content
Log in

GM and corporate responsibility

  • Ethics And Excellence: Values In Corporations
  • The 2nd DePaul University & Society Of Business Ethics Conference, July 1984
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Only by distinguishing corporate, moral, social and legal responsibility can GM know how to weigh and respond to its various responsibilities. Corporate responsibility stems from the ends for which the corporation is formed. In addition the corporation is responsible for meeting the moral demands that come from the moral law. The corporation is responsible for meeting legitimate social demands proposed by society. If society uses the law to express its demands, the demands yield legal responsibilities. Those demands that are social but neither moral nor legal may not be legitimate demands that GM must respond to at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Richard T. De George, University Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Kansas, former President of the Metaphysical Society of America, and Vice President of the International Federation of Philosophical Societies, is the author of Business Ethics and contributing co-editor of Ethics, Free Enterprise and Public Policy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De George, R.T. GM and corporate responsibility. J Bus Ethics 5, 177–179 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383623

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383623

Keywords

Navigation