Skip to main content
Log in

Nonconvergence in the theory of random orders

  • Published:
Order Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are sentences in the first order theory of partial orders for whom the limit probability of the sentence holding for the random partial order of dimension two does not exist. Furthermore there is no decision procedure that distinguishes those sentences which hold almost surely from those which hold almost never.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Foy and A. R. Woods (1989) Probability of sentences about two linear orders, Proceedings of the Workshop on Feasible Mathematics, M.S.I., Cornell.

  2. B. A.Trachtembrot (1950) Impossibility of an algorithm for the decision problem on finite classes, Doklady Akademia Nauk. S.S.R. 70, 569–572.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.Winkler (1985) Random orders, Order 1, 317–331.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.Winkler and G.Brightwell (1989) A counterexample in the theory of random orders, Order 5, 363–368.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by I. Rival

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spencer, J. Nonconvergence in the theory of random orders. Order 7, 341–348 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383198

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383198

AMS subject classifications (1980)

Key words

Navigation