Skip to main content
Log in

On the influence of the exit conditions on the entrainment rate in the development region of a free, round, turbulent jet

  • Published:
Applied Scientific Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development region of a free round turbulent jet was experimentally investigated in order to determine the dependence of the jet development on the exit conditions. In particular the influence of the exit conditions on the entrainment rate in both the axisymmetrix mixing layer region and at a distance of 20D from the nozzle was investigated.

The entrainment rate at 20D depends noticeably on the exit boundary layer state, i.e. laminar or turbulent, and on the turbulence intensity of the core. A laminar exit boundary layer showed the highest value of entrainment rate. A turbulent one reduced the entrainment rate at 20D by 15%. A grid placed at the nozzle exit, in order to increase the turbulence intensity of the core, reduced the entrainment rate at 20D by 40%. It must be mentioned that this grid also disturbed the exit boundary layer.

An empirical relation for the entrainment rate at the end of the mixing layer region as a function of the mixing layer parameters, is successful in predicting the entrainment rate at 20D within an accuracy of 5%. This result suggests a strong dependence of the jet development region on mixing layer processes, i.e. the development of organized structures and their coalescence. Possibly there is no asymptotic region which is fully independent of the mixing layer processes, and which is not more or less influenced by the exit conditions via the influence on these processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boguslawski L and Popiel CzO (1978) J Fluid Mech 90:111

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bradshaw P (1966) J Fluid Mech 26:225

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crow SC and Champagne FH (1971) J Fluid Mech 48:547

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hasan MAZ and Hussain AKMF (1982) J Fluid Mech 115:59

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hill BJ (1972) J Fluid Mech 51:773

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hinze JO and van der Hegge Zijnen BG (1949) Appl Sci Res A1:435

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hinze JO (1975) Turbulence. McGraw-Hill, Inc

  8. Husain, ZD and Hussain AKMF (1979) AIAA J 17:48

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hussain AKMF and Clark AR (1977) Phys Fluids 20:1416

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hussain AKMF and Zedan MF (1978) Phys Fluids 21:1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hussain AKMF and Zedan MF (1978) Phys Fluids 21:1475

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ricou FP and Spalding DB (1961) J Fluid Mech 11:21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roshko A. (1972) AIAA J 14:1349

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schlichting H (1951) Grenzschicht-Theorie. Verlag und Druck G. Braun

  15. Tennekes H and Lumley JL (1972) A first course in turbulence. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press

  16. Townsend AD (1956) The structure of turbulent shear flow. Cambridge University Press

  17. Wille R (1963) Z. Flugwiss 11:222

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wygnanski I and Fiedler H (1969) J Fluid Mech 38:577

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yule AJ (1978) J Fluid Mech 89:413

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zaman KBMQ and Hussain AKMF (1980) J Fluid Mech 101:449

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fondse, H., Leijdens, H. & Ooms, G. On the influence of the exit conditions on the entrainment rate in the development region of a free, round, turbulent jet. Appl. Sci. Res. 40, 355–375 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383041

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383041

Keywords

Navigation