Abstract
In a recent paper in this journal Charles B. Saunders et al. argue that corporations have no social responsibility regarding alienation in the workplace in that there is no significant degree of alienation in the workplace, at least in white collar and management level positions in corporate America.
Contrary to Saunders et al., this paper defines the concept of alienation. Having done that, it proceeds to show that the argument Saunders et al. make flounders on logical grounds. I conclude that Saunders et al. provide no evidence for the claim that alienation is lacking (in any degree) in corporate America.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Althusser, Louis: 1969, For Marx, translated by Ben Brewster, New York: Pantheon Books.
Arneson, Richard J.: 1987, ‘Meaningful Work and Market Socialism’, Ethics 97, 517–545.
Bonjour, Laurence: 1985, The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brenkert, George: 1983, Marx's Ethics of Freedom, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Buchanan, Allen: 1982, Marx and Justice, Totowa: Littlefield, Adams.
Carver, Terrell: 1982, Marx's Social Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, G. A.: 1978, Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cohen, Marshall, Thomas Nagel, and Thomas Scanlon (eds.): 1980, Marx, Justice and History, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Elster, Jon: 1985, Making Sense of Marx, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Little, Daniel: 1986, The Scientific Marx, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Miller, Richard: 1984, Analyzing Marx, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nielsen, Kai and Steven C. Patton (eds.): 1981, Marx and Morality, Ontario: Canadian Association for Publishing in Philosophy.
Reiman, Jeffrey H.: 1987, ‘Exploitation, Force, and the Moral Assessment of Capitalism: Thoughts on Roemer and Cohen’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 16, 3–41.
Roemer, John: 1981, Analytical Foundations of Marxian Economic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roemer, John (ed.): 1986, Analytical Marxism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roemer, John (ed.): 1982, A General Theory of Exploitation and Class, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Roemer, John (ed.): 1982, ‘New Directions in the Marxian Theory of Exploitation’, Politics and Society 11, 253–287.
Saunders, Charles B., Hugh M. O'Neil and Oscar W. Jensen: 1986, ‘Alienation in Corporate America: Fact or Fable?’, Journal of Business Ethics 5, 285–289.
Shaw, William: 1978, Marx's Theory of History, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Sher, Gerson S., (ed. and trans): 1978, Marxist Humanism and Praxis, New York: Prometheus Books.
Snyder, M. and W. B. Swann: 1975, ‘When Actions Reflect Attitudes: The Politics of Impression Management’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32, 1034–1042.
Suchting, W. A.: 1983, Marx: An Introduction, New York: New York University Press.
Tucker, Robert C.: 1972, Philosophy and Myth in Karl Marx, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolff, Robert Paul: 1984, Understanding Marx, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wood, Allen: 1981, Karl Marx, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
J. Angelo Corlett is a fellow in the Philosophy Department at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He has published papers in the Journal of Business Ethics, Business & Professional Ethics Journal, Public Affairs Quarterly and the American Psychologist. His areas of specialization are Social/Political Philosophy, Ethics and Value Theory. He is currently editing a book on Rawls and Nozick, and he is also doing research on analytical marxism. The former of these projects is funded by a research grant awarded to him by the University of California, Santa Barbara.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corlett, J.A. Alienation in capitalist society. J Bus Ethics 7, 699–701 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382980
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382980