Anonymity and whistleblowing

Abstract

This paper examines the moral arguments for and against employees' blowing the whistle on illegal or immoral actions of their employers. It asks whether such professional dissidents are justified in disclosing wrongdoing by others while concealing their own identity. Part I examines the concept of anonymity, distinguishing it from two similar concepts — secrecy and privacy. Part II analyzes the concept of whistleblowing using recent definitions by Bok, Bowie and De George. Various arguments against anonymous whistleblowing are identified and evaluated. The author concludes with a defense of the practice in terms of social benefits — primarily the redressing of wrongdoing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elliston, F.A. Anonymity and whistleblowing. J Bus Ethics 1, 167–177 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382768

Download citation

Keywords

  • Economic Growth
  • Social Benefit
  • Similar Concept
  • Immoral Action
  • Moral Argument