Abstract
A Kantian evaluation of Taylorism in the workplace requires a consideration of four problems; (1) the conditions of agency, (2) the relation of Taylorism to these conditions, (3) an explanation of the method given by the Typic for applying the Categorical Imperative, and (4) the actual application of the Categorical Imperative to Taylorism. An agent who views himself as a performer is distinguished from an agent who is a mere observer of his own actions, and it is argued that Taylorism in effect attempts to remove the purposiveness of action from the workmen and to reduce them to the state of being mere observers of their own actions. Then it is argued that in order for one to attempt to think of a maxim as a universal law, one must posit a universal and necessary connection between the circumstances and the performances and then another such connection between the action and the purpose to be achieved. A model is constructed using heat-seeking machines, and it is argued that a principle analogous to Taylorism could not hold as a universal law for such machines. Thus, Taylorism is not an acceptable solution to the problem of coordinating the activities of self-directed agents within the workplace.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baier, Kurt, ‘Action and Agent’, The Monist, XLIX, (April 1965), p. 194.
Shakespeare, William, Hamlet, III, i, 56–60.
Kant, Immanuel, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, translated by Lewis White Beck, (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1981), p. 11, Ak. 395.
Baier, Kurt, ‘Action and Agent’, pp. 188–194.
Baier, Kurt, ‘Responsibility and Action’, in The Nature of Human Action, edited by Myles Brand, (Scott Foresmen and Company, Glenview, 1970), p. 114.
Kant, Immanuel, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, p. 11, Ak. 395.
Braverman, Harry, Labor and Monopoly Capital, (Monthly Review Press, New York and London, 1974), pp. 112–121.
Kant, Immanuel, (Critique of Practical Reason, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1956), p. 72, Ak. 69.
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, p. 73, Ak. 70.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dr. Michael K. Green is Assistant Professor at the Department of Philosophy at SUNY-Oneonta. His most important publications are: ‘Using Nature to Typify Freedom: The Application of the Categorical Imperative’, International Studies in Philosophy (Fall 1982); ‘Marx on Utility and Right’, Political Theory 11, No. 3 (August, 1983), pp. 433–446; and ‘Kant, Crimes Against Nature, and Contraception’, forthcoming in The New Scholasticism.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Green, M.K. A Kantian evaluation of Taylorism in the workplace. J Bus Ethics 5, 165–169 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382758
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382758