Applied Scientific Research

, Volume 41, Issue 3–4, pp 289–300 | Cite as

Noise analysis of refractive index profile measurements of an optical fibre and preform by deflection function techniques

  • P. L. Chu
  • T. Whitbread
  • P. Y. P. Chen
Special-Issue Papers

Abstract

It is shown that many of the existing index profiling methods for optical fibre and preform are related to one another through the deflection function from which the index profile is reconstructed. These methods are classified into direct deflection function measurement, integral (or phase) measurement, and differential (or intensity) measurement. The deflection function from the integral method is obtained by measuring the phase distribution of the exit rays followed by numerical differentiation. Thus the reconstructed index profile has Gaussian noise. The deflection function from the differential method is obtained by measuring the light intensity distribution followed by a numerical integration. This process enhances low frequency noise but suppresses high frequency noise. The noise from direct method behaves in the similar manner as in the differential method except that it is less pronounced. Studies of the choice of methods for profiling of preform, multimode fibre and single mode fibre are also given.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6. References

  1. [1]
    P.L. Chu and T. Whitbread, Error analysis of refractive index profile measurements of optical fibre and preform. In: Huang Hung-chia and Allan W. Snyder (eds.) Optical Waveguide Sciences. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague (1983) pp. 213–221.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    P.L. Chu, Nondestructive measurement of index profile of an optical fibre preform. Electron. Lett. 13 (1977) 736–738.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    H.M. Presby, D. Marcuse, L. Boggs and H.W. Astle, Rapid automatic index profiling of whole fibre sample: Part II. B.S.T.J. 58 (1979) 883–902.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Marcuse, Refractive index determination by the focussing method. Appl. Opt. 18 (1979) 9–13.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    I. Sasaki, D. Payne and M.J. Adams, Measurement of refractive index profiles in optical fibre preforms by spatial filtering techniques. Electron. Lett. 16 (1980) 219–221.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    P.L. Chu and D. Peri, Holographic measurement of refractive index profile of optical fibre preform. Electron. Lett. 16 (1980) 876–877.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Peri, P.L. Chu and T. Whitbread, Direct display of the deflection function of optical fibre preform. Appl. Opt. 21 (1982) 809–814.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    C. Saekeang, P.L. Chu and T. Whitbread, Nondestructive measurement of refractive-index profile and cross-sectional geometry of optical fiber preforms. Appl. Opt. 19 (1980) 2025–2030.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    W.J. Stewart, Optical fibre and preform profiling technology. J. Quantum Electron. QE-18 (1982) 1451–1466.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    K.K. Liem, Characterisation of Single Mode Fibre. BE Undergraduate thesis, University of New South Wales, 1983.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    C.A. Millar, Direct method of determining equivalent step-index profiles for monomode fibres. Electron. Lett. 17 (1981) 458–460.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    F. Alard, L. Jeunhomme and P. Sansonetti, Fundamental mode spot size measurement in single-mode optical fibres. Electron. Lett. 19 (1981) 313–314.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    E. Nicolaisen and P. Danielsen, Calculated and measured spot size of equivalent Gaussian field in single-mode optical fibres. Electron. Lett. 19 (1983) 27–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. L. Chu
    • 1
  • T. Whitbread
    • 1
  • P. Y. P. Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUSA
  2. 2.School of Nuclear EngineeringUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations