Skip to main content
Log in

Moral fictions and scientific management

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines Alasdair MacIntyre's argument in After Virtue that corporate managers do not have the rational expertise in social control which they have used to justify their position in modern society. In particular, it is claimed that managerial science by taking an emotivist view, putting ends and values beyond the reach of sound rational judgment, has made human relationships matters of manipulation and undermined its own moral legitimacy. The question is advanced as to whether managers must operate from emotivist premises or whether they can truly understand and thus truly manage human affairs by rational reflection about human purpose, value, and intention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Additional information

Paul C. Santilli is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Siena College, Loudonville, N.Y. His previous publication is: ‘The Informative and Persuasive Functions of Advertising: A Moral Appraisal’, Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1983), 27–33.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santilli, P. Moral fictions and scientific management. J Bus Ethics 3, 279–285 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381749

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381749

Keywords

Navigation