Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of current evaluation methods for thermal environment applied to garage work

  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The thermal environment in 42 garages was measured and compared with the results of questionnaires completed by mechanics working in these garages. In the garages studied, the mean air temperature appeared to be rather low. Mean air velocity was moderate (0.17 m/s), with a significant variation among garages (0.07–0.60 m/s). An accurate estimation of the metabolic activity and clothing factor was made. Four current climate standards were selected to evaluate the climate conditions of the investigated garages, i.e. L-index, L-index (comfort), PMV-index and the ASHRAE-index. It appears that the number of garages within the standards acceptable (or recommended) range varies considerably with the standard used. Converting the different standards to the same basis (80% acceptation) does not reduce this variation. These large differences are explained by evaluation of different parameters on which the standards are based. In order to evaluate the thermal environment in garages, Fanger's PMV-index is recommended, as it shows the greatest sensitivity (0.75) combined with a similar positive predictive value (0.65) compared to the other standards. Moreover, this standard incorporates air velocity, which is shown to be crucial in evaluating the thermal environment in garages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASHRAE standard 55-81 (1981) Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Airconditioning Engineers Inc. Atlanta, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berglund LG (1979) Thermal acceptability. ASHRAE transactions II, New York, pp 825–834

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berglund LG (1978) Mathematical models for predicting the thermal comfort response of building occupants. ASHRAE transactions AT78-7a, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Design and lay-out of workplaces P-30 (1983) Dutch Labour inspection. Voorburg, The Netherlands

  5. Fanger PO (1972) Thermal comfort. Analysis and applications in environmental engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. International standard ISO-7730 (1985) Moderate thermal environments-determination of the PMV and PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal comfort. International Standards Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kröling P (1985) Gesundheits- und Befindensstörungen in klimatisierten Gebäuden. Verlag W Zuckschwerdt, München-Bern-Wien

    Google Scholar 

  8. Olesen BW (1982) Thermal comfort, technical review. Bruel & Kjaer, Naerum, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reinders H (1969) Mensch und Klima. Klima, Klimaphysiologie, Klimatechnik. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  10. Veiligheidswet (1934) Nederlandse Staatswetten nr.57. Schuurmans en Jordens, Den Haag, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kant, I.J., Bonn, P.J.A. & Notermans, J.V.H. A comparison of current evaluation methods for thermal environment applied to garage work. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 61, 115–121 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381615

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381615

Key words

Navigation