Summary
Based upon a conceptual dichotomy between those environmental influences on a population which vary in their effect with population density, and those which do not, it is widely held that only density-dependent factors can determine equilibrium abundance or “carrying capacity” for a population under field conditions. Since the direct effects of climate on mortality and birth rates are commonly thought to be independent of density, that interpretation means that correlations between climatic factors and long-term average population density are presumed to reflect only indirect effects of climate, acting, for example, on resource availability. When density-dependent and density-independent processes are carefully defined, however, and their expected consequences derived, it becomes clear that the equilibrium abundance for a species can usually be altered by any environmental factor which has a consistent effect on either birth rate or mortality rate, regardless of whether that action itself depends upon density of the species. This implies that the concept of “carrying capacity” must be extended, to include possible direct, density-independent effects of climate on birth and death rates; these conclusions follow from a very simple model which appears to be extremely robust. Hence, geographic trends in average population density, which are so familiar to the biographer, may well be due in a straight-forward manner to the influences of climate, even if climate were to act only in a densityindependent manner.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrewartha, H.G., Birch, L.C.: The distribution and abundance of animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1954
Brinton, E.: The distribution of Pacific euphausiids. Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanog. University of California 8, 51–270 (1962)
Ekman, S.P.: Zoogeography of the sea. London: Sidwick & Jackson 1953
Enright, J.T.: Distribution, population dynamics and behavior of a sand-beach crustacean, Synchelidium sp. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Calif. at Los Angeles (1961)
Gadgil, M., Solbrig, O.T.: The concept of r-and K-selection: evidence from wild flowers and some theoretical considerations. Amer. Naturalist 106, 14–31 (1972)
Horn, H.S.: Regulation of animal numbers: a model counter-example. Ecology 49, 776–778 (1968)
Klomp, H.: The influence of climate and weather on the mean density level, the fluctuations and the regulation of animal populations. Arch. Neérl. Zool. 15, 68–109 (1962)
Krebs, C.J.: Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. New York: Harper & Row 1972
MacArthur, R.H.: Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. New York: Harper & Row 1972
MacArthur, R.H., Wilson, E.O.: The theory of island biogeography. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1967
McLaren, I.A.: Adaptive significance of large size and long life on the chaetognath Sagitta elegans in the arctic. Ecology 47, 852–857 (1966)
Nicholson, A.J.: The balance of animal populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 2, 132–178 (1933)
Nicholson, A.J.: An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. Aust. J. Zool. 2, 9–65 (1954)
Pianka, E.: On r-and K-selection. Amer. Natur. 104, 592–597 (1970)
Smith, H.S.: The role of biotic factors in the determination of population densities. J. Econ. Entomol. 28, 873–898 (1935)
Varley, G.C.: The natural control of population balance in the knapweed gallfly (Urophora jaceana). J. Anim. Ecol. 16, 139–187 (1947)
Watts, D.: Principles of biogeography. New York: McGraw-Hill 1971
Wilbert, H.: Über Festlegung und Einhaltung der mittleren Dichte von Insektenpopulationen. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 50, 576–615 (1962)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Enright, J.T. Climate and population regulation. Oecologia 24, 295–310 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381136
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381136