Skip to main content
Log in

The religious nature of practical reason: A way into the debate

  • Religious Studies & Business Ethics
  • New Directions In An Emerging Field
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper criticizes De George's portrayal of theological ethics and its purported inability to make a distinctive contribution to business ethics with the following theses. (1) De George's understanding of the nature of theological ethics is faulty. Consequently his typology of the field is not an adequate description of the range of prevailing approaches. (2) A constructive proposal for religious ethics is offered which takes as its starting points (a) an aspect of human experience (self-transcendence) and (b) the human capacity to reason in order to claim (via Kant, Rahner, Gamwell, and others) that practical reason is religious in nature. As such, a distinctive contribution of religious ethics is its capacity to evaluate business activity in terms of its consistency with our most fundamental, all-inclusive human loyalities and affirmations about the nature of reality itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchamp, Tom L. with Norman Bowie: 1983, Ethical Theory and Business, 2nd ed., (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, Norman: 1982, Business Ethics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, James: 1980, ‘An Ethics of Faith’, in ed. Leo O'Donovan, A World of Grace (Seabury, New York), pp. 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Anne: 1973, ‘Theology and Experience in the Thought of Karl Rahner’, The Journal of Religion 55, 359–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Charles: 1983, ‘Reason, Tradition, Community: The Search for Ethical Foundations’, in ed. Leory S. Rounder, Foundations of Ethics (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame).

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, Richard T.: 1982, Business Ethics (Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, Richard T. 1986, ‘Theological Ethics and Business Ethics’, (this issue, 421–432) paper for a symposium entitled Religious Studies and Business Ethics: New Directions in an Emerging Field, DePaul University, (April 1984).

  • Donaldson, Thomas: 1982, Corporations and Morality, (Prentice-Hall, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Thomas: 1983, Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach (with Patricia Werhane) 2nd ed., (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamwell, Franklin I.: 1982, ‘Region and the Public Purpose’, The Journal of Religion 62, 272–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986, ‘Freedom and the Economic Order: A Foreword to Religious Evaluation’, in Bruce Grelle and David A. Krueger (eds.), Christianity and Capitalism: Perspectives on Religion, Liberalism and the Economy, Chicago: Center for the Scientific Study of Religion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford: 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures, (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, Kenneth: 1983, ‘Morality and Organizations’, in eds. Donaldson and Werhane, Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Ronald: 1978, Religious Reason: The Rational and Moral Basis of Religious Belief (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, James M.: 1974, Theology and Christian Ethics (Pilgrim Press, Philadelphia).

    Google Scholar 

  • 1975, Can Ethics Be Christian? (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel: 1788, Critique of Practical Reason, trans. by Lewis White Beck, (Bobbs-Merrill Co., Indianapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, John: 1983, ‘Morality and the Ideal of Rationality in Formal Organizations’, in eds. Donaldson and Werhane, Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, H. Richard: 1943, Radical Monotheism and Western Culture (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, Reinhold: 1942, ‘Religion and Action’, in ed. Ruth Nada Anshen, Science and Man (Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donovan, Leo J.: 1980, A World of Grace (Seabury, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, Schubert: 1979, Faith and Freedom (Abingdon, Nashville).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahner, Karl: 1968, Spirit in the World (Herder & Heder, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • 1969, Hearers of the World (Herder & Herder, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, Paul: 1951–63, Systematic Theology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

David A. Krueger is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Chicago Divinity School. He is executive Director of the Center for Ethics and Corporate Policy in Chicago.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krueger, D.A. The religious nature of practical reason: A way into the debate. Journal of Business Ethics 5, 511–519 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380757

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380757

Keywords

Navigation