Abstract
The author shows that, after the great evolution of U.S. product liability law in the seventies, a backlash was inevitable. These restrictions are demonstrated by reference to state statutes, court decisions, court procedures, and theories. The author argues that lobbying of powerful interest groups eventually was responsible for stopping and even reversing the expansion of products liability law.
Zusammenfassung
Der Autor weist nach, daß nach den großen Umwälzungen des Produkthaftpflichtrechts in den siebziger Jahren ein Stillstand, ja sogar ein Rückschritt eingetreten ist. Der Autor zeigt dies an vielen Bereichen auf, etwa der einzelstaatlichen Gesetzgebung, der Gerichtspraxis im materiellen und Verfahrensrecht, und der Theoriediskussion. Dies ist vor dem Hintergrund eines umfangreichen “lobying” der betroffenen Interessenverbände zu sehen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ausness, R. (1988). Cigarette company liability: Preemption, public policy, and alternative compensation systems. Syracuse Law Review, 39, 897–971.
Bielicke, D. (1990). Successor liability for punitive damages: Breaking the corporate rule. Washington University Law Quarterly, 68, 339–369.
Denemark, H. (1990). Improving litigation against drug manufacturers for failure to warn against possible side effects: Keeping dubious lawsuits from driving good drugs off the market. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 40, 413–450.
Green, M., & Matasar, R. (1990). The Supreme Court and the products liability crisis: Lessons from Boyle's Government Contractor Defense. Southern California Law Review, 63, 637–726.
Hare, F., & Gilbert J. (1989). Discovery in products liability cases: The plaintiff's plea for judicial understanding. American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 12, 413–436.
Hare, F., Gilbert, J., & Ellenberger, M. (1989). Confidentiality orders in products liability cases. American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 13, 597–614.
Henderson, J., & Eisenberg, T. (1990). The quiet revolution in products liability: An empirical study of legal change. UCLA Law Review, 37, 479–553.
Henderson, J., & Twerski, A. (1990). Doctrinal collapse in products liability: The empty shell of failure to warn. New York University Law Review, 65, 265–327.
Huber, P. (1988). Liability: The legal revolution and its consequences. New York: Basic Books.
Komesar, N. (1990). Injuries and institutions: Tort reform, tort theory, and beyond. New York University Law Review, 65, 23–77.
Naile, P. (1989). Tort liability for DPT vaccine injury and the preemption doctrine. Indiana Law Review, 22, 655–705.
Neely, R. (1988). The products liability mess: How business can be rescued from the politics of state courts. New York: Free Press.
Priest, G. (1987). The current insurance crisis and modern tort law. Yale Law Journal, 96, 1521–1590.
Prins-Stairs, J. (1989). The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. Journal of Legal Medicine, 10, 703–737.
Rabin, R. (1989). Tort system on trial: The burden of mass toxics litigation. Yale Law Journal, 98, 813–829.
Schwartz, A. (1988). Proposals for products liability reform: A theoretical synthesis. Yale Law Journal, 97, 353–415.
Spitz, S. (1990). From res ipsa loquitur to diethylstilbestrol: The unidentifiable tortfeasor in California. Indiana Law Journal, 65, 591–636.
Twerski, A. (1989). Market share — A tale of two centuries. Brooklyn Law Review, 55, 869–882.
Van Kirk, R. (1989). The evolution of useful life statutes in the products liability reform effort. Duke Law Journal, 1689–1751.
Additional information
Peter B. Maggs is Corman Professor of Law at the University of Illinois College of Law, 504 East Pennsylvania Avenue, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maggs, P.B. Recent developments in products liability law in the USA. J Consum Policy 14, 29–33 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380274
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380274