Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution of partial melt in a felsic system: the importance of surface energy

  • Published:
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The texture, distribution, and infiltration tendency of a quartz-albite melt in equilibrium with a synthetic, texturally-equilibrated quartzite was examined in a series of distribution and infiltration experiments at 1,250° C and 8 kbar hydrostatic pressure. Wetting angle measurements from melt distribution experiments show a dihedral angle (θ) of 60 degrees, implying a quartz/quartz interfacial energy approximately 1.7 times the quartz/melt value. Because of this specific relationship between interfacial energies, the system can achieve its lowest surface free energy state with the melt either in pools or along grain edge intersections, possibly forming some interconnected channels. Stability of melt in pockets and along grain edge intersections was observed in a fourteen-day, dispersed-melt experiment, yet melt pools failed to disperse into the quartzite during infiltration experiments. Comparison of the observed dihedral angle with previously measured surface energy values for the melt and quartz shows excellent agreement, and also demonstrates that an aggregate of randomly orientated anisotropic grains acts approximately isotropically.

While these experiments are not strictly applicable to real crustal systems, they do indicate that, at least in some felsic systems, the melt has no preference for uniform grainedge wetting relative to collection at grain corners or in large pools. This “ambivalent” behavior is attributable to the 60-degree wetting angle, which has been shown to separate systems in which melt tends to disperse in interconnected channels (θ<60°) from those in which melt tends to become isolated at grain corners (θ> 60°).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brace WF, Walsh JB (1962) Some direct measurements of the surface energy of quartz and orthoclase. Am Mineral 47:1111–1122

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulau JR, Waff HS, Tyburczy JA (1979) Mechanical and thermodynamic constraints of fluid distribution in partial melts. J Geophys Res 84:6102–6108

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RF, Kohlsdedt DL (1982) Interfacial energies in the olivine basalt system. In: Akimoto S, Manghnani MH (eds), High pressure research in geophysics. Center for Academic Publications, Tokyo pp 217–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn CG, Lionetti F (1949) The effect of orientation difference on grain boundary energies. Trans AIME 185:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondros ED, McLean D (1976) Grain boundary fragility. In: Chadwick GA, Smith DA (eds) Grain boundary structure and properties, Academic Press, London New York San Francisco, pp 357–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingery WD, Bowen HK, Ulhmann DR (1976) Introduction to ceramics. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 177–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin H (1979) Geochemical behavior of major and trace elements during incongruent melting of biotite in the St. Malo massif migmatites. N Jahrb Mineral Monatsh 11:509–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehnert KR, Busch W, Schneider G (1973) Initial melting at grain boundaries of quartz and feldspar in gneisses and granulites. N Jahrb Mineral Monatsh 4:165–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Moment RL, Gordon RB (1964) Energy of grain boundaries in halite. J Am Ceram Soc 47:570–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt HW (1980) Genesis of the New Quebec and Adirondack granulites: evidence for their production by partial melting. Contrib Mineral Petrol 72:303–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Price RC, Taylor SR (1977) The rare earth geochemistry of granite, gneiss, and migmatite from the western metamorphic belt of Southeastern Australia. Contrib Mineral Petrol 62:249–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapela CW, Shaw DM (1979) Trace and major element models of granitiod gneisses in the Pampean Ranges, Argentina. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 43:1117–1129

    Google Scholar 

  • Readey DW, Jech RE (1968) Energies and grooving kinetics of [001] tilt boundaries in nickel oxide. J Am Ceram Soc 51:201–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegger OK, Van Vlack LH (1960) Dihedral angle measurement. Trans AIME 218:933–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CS (1964) Some elementary principles of polycrystalline microstructure. Metall Rev 9:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Waff HS, Bulau JR (1979) Equilibrium fluid distribution in an ultramafic partial melt under hydrostatic stress conditions. J Geophys Res 84:6109–6114

    Google Scholar 

  • Waff HS, Bulau JR (1982) Experimental determination of near equilibrium textures in partially molten silicates. In: Akimoto S, Manghnani MH (eds), High pressure research in geophysics. Center for Academic Publications, Tokyo pp 229–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker D, Mullins O (1981) Surface tension of natural silicate melts from 1,200°–1,500° C and implications for melt structure. Contrib Mineral Petrol 76:455–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson EB (1982) Melt infiltration and magma evolution. Geology 10:236–240

    Google Scholar 

  • White AJR, Chappell BW (1977) Ultrametamorphism and granitiod gniesses. Tectonophys 43:7–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler HGF, Breitbart R (1978) New aspects of granitic magmas. N Jahrb Mineral Monatsh 10:463–480

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jurewicz, S.R., Watson, E.B. Distribution of partial melt in a felsic system: the importance of surface energy. Contr. Mineral. and Petrol. 85, 25–29 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380218

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380218

Keywords

Navigation