Oecologia

, Volume 56, Issue 2–3, pp 405–412 | Cite as

Inter-relationships between type, size and colour of fruits and dispersal in southern African trees

  • R. S. Knight
  • W. R. Siegfried
Original Papers

Summary

The indigenous angiosperm tree flora (1,340 species) of southern Africa was analysed for type, size and colour of fruits and class of biotic dispersal agent (consumer). Species producing fleshy (drupes and berries) and dry (pods, capsules and nuts) fruits account for 52% and 47%, respectively, of the flora. The flora contains about 2.5 times as many berry-producing as drupe-producing species. Based on a log-linear model, fruit type, consumer and fruit size are dependent statistically on each other, whereas fruit colour depends on both fruit size and consumer type acting independently of each other. Drupes and berries are consumed by birds and mammals, with berries being favoured by both birds and mammals. At least 23% (307 species) of the flora apparently depends predominantly on birds for seed dispersal. Drupes and berries favoured by birds tend to be small and brightly coloured (red or black), whereas those eaten mainly by mammals tend to be large and dull (yellow or green). Relatively few fleshy fruits are brown. Pods, capsules and nuts tend to be brown or green. Birds apparently tend to avoid eating green fruits. The notion that green coloration has evolved to enhance crypsis and/or to signal unpalatability in unripe fruit to reduce premature exploitation is questioned. Green as a cryptic colour is incompatible with the demonstrated mammalian selection of this colour, while to function aposematically a stronger contrast colour may be required.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berg RY (1975) Myrmecochorous plants in Australia and their dispersal by ants. Aust J Bot 23:475–508Google Scholar
  2. Brown MB (1973) Aids in the selection of models for multidimensional contingency tables. Available from Health Science Computing Facility University of California Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown MB (1974) The identification of sources of significance in two-way contingency tables. Applied Statistics 23:405–413Google Scholar
  4. Brown MB (1976) Screening effects in multidimensional contingency tables. Applied Statistics 25:37–46Google Scholar
  5. Brown MB (1977a) P2F Two-way frequency tables-empty cells and departures from independence. In: Dixon WJ, Brown MB (eds) Biomedical Computer Programs P Series. University of California Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown MB (1977b) P3F Multiway frequency tables-the log linear model. In: Dixon WJ, Brown MB (eds) Biomedical Computer Programs P Series. University of California Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapin JP (1932–54) The birds of the Belgian Congo. Bul Amer Mus Nat Hist vols 65, 75, 75A, 75BGoogle Scholar
  8. Coates Palgrave K (1977) Trees of southern Africa. Struik Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  9. Corner EJH (1949) The durian theory or the origin of the modern tree. Ann Bot 13:367–414Google Scholar
  10. Fienberg SE (1970) The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables. Ecology 51:419–433Google Scholar
  11. Fienberg SE (1972) The analysis of incomplete multi-way contingency tables. Biometrics 28:177–202Google Scholar
  12. Fienberg SE (1977) The Analysis of cross-classified categorical data. M.I.T. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodman LA (1969) On partitioning λ2 and detecting partial association in three-way contingency tables. J Royal Stat Soc (B) 31:486–498Google Scholar
  14. Howe HF, Estabrook GF (1977) On intraspecific competition for avian dispersers in tropical trees. Amer Natur 111:817–832Google Scholar
  15. Huntley BJ (1965) A preliminary account of the Ngoye forest reserve, Zululand. JS Afr Bot 31:177–205Google Scholar
  16. Hildebrand M (1974) Analysis of vertebrate structure. Wiley New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Kendall MG (1980) Multivariate analysis 2nd edn. Griffin LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Lamprey HF, Halevy G, Makacha S (1974) Interactions between Acacia, bruchid seed beetles and large herbivores. E Afr Wildl J 12:81–85Google Scholar
  19. Liversidge R (1965) The birds of the Addo National Park. Koedoe 8:41–67Google Scholar
  20. Manly BFJ (1976) Exponential data transformations. Statistician 25:37–42Google Scholar
  21. McKey D (1975) The ecology of coevolved seed dispersal systems. In: Gilbert LE, Raven PH (eds) Coevolution of animals and plants. University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  22. Morton ES (1973) On the evolutionary advantages and disadvantages of fruit eating in tropical birds. Amer Natur 107:8–22Google Scholar
  23. Oatley TB (1969) Bird ecology in the evergreen forests of North Western Zambia. Puku 5:141–180Google Scholar
  24. Palmer E (1977) Trees of southern Africa. Collins JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
  25. Palmer E, Pitman N (1972, 1973) Trees of southern Africa vols 1–3. Balkema Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips JFV (1927) The role of the “Bushdove” Columba arquatrix T and K, in fruit dispersal in the Knysna Forests. S Afr J Sci 24:435–440Google Scholar
  27. Phillips JFV (1931) Forest succession and ecology in the Knysna Region. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa 11, Government Printer PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  28. Pijl L van der (1969a) Evolutionary action of tropical animals on the reproduction of plants. In: Lowe McConnell RH (ed) Speciation in tropical environments. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Pijl L van der (1969b) Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Skead CJ (1965) Report on the bird life in the Mountain Zebra National Park, Cradock, C.P., 1962–1964. Koedoe 8:1–40Google Scholar
  31. Skutch AF (1980) Arils as food of tropical American birds. Condor 82:31–42Google Scholar
  32. Snow DW (1971) Evolutionary aspects of fruit-eating by birds. Ibis 113:194–202Google Scholar
  33. Stiles EW (1980) Patterns of fruit presentation and seed dispersal in bird-disseminated woody plants in the eastern deciduous forest. Amer Natur 116:670–688Google Scholar
  34. Turcek FJ (1963) Color preference in fruit- and seed-eating birds. Proceedings of XIII International Ornithological Congress 1:285–292Google Scholar
  35. White F (1962) Forest flora of Northern Rhodesia. University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Williams K (1976a) Analysis of multidimensional contingency tables. Statistician 25:51–58Google Scholar
  37. Williams K (1976b) The failure of Pearson's goodness of fit statistic. Statistician 25:49Google Scholar
  38. Wyk P van (1972–1974) Trees of the Kruger National Park, vols 1–2. Purnell JohannesburgGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. S. Knight
    • 1
  • W. R. Siegfried
    • 1
  1. 1.FitzPatrick InstituteUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations