Skip to main content
Log in

Formic acid excretion in comparison with methanol excretion in urine of workers occupationally exposed to methanol

  • Original articles
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A semiautomated head-space gas chromatographic (GC) method was developed for measuring formic acid in urine. The method consists of heating 1 ml urine sample in a 20-ml air-tight vial in the presence of 1 ml sulfuric acid and 2 ml ethanol at 60°C for 30 min for ethyl esterification and air-liquid equilibrium, followed by automatic injection of 1 ml head-space air into a flame ionization detector GC. The detection limit was 1 mg/l for formic acid. The method was applied to measure formic acid in the shift-end urine samples from 88 workers exposed to methanol at 66.6 ppm (as geometric mean) and in urine samples from 149 nonexposed controls. Methanol concentrations were also determined. Regression analysis showed that urinary formic acid concentrations, as observed or corrected for either creatinine concentration or specific gravity of urine (1.016), correlated significantly with time-weighted average intensities of exposure to methanol vapor. Men excreted significantly more formic acid than women. Comparison with methanol excretion suggested, however, that urinary formic acid is less sensitive than urinary methanol as an indicator of methanol vapor exposure, primarily because the background level for formic acid (26 mg/l as arithmetic mean, or 23 mg/l as geometric mean) is more than ten times higher than the level for methanol (1.9 mg/l as arithmetic mean, or 1.7mg/l as geometric mean). After theoretical methanol exposure at infinite concentration, the urinary formic acid/methanol ratio should be about 0.4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (1991) Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. ACGIH, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Angerer J (1976) Gaschromatographische Bestimmung von Ameisensäure im Harn in Form von Kohlenmonoxid. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 14:73–77 (in German with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann K, Angerer J (1979) Occupational chronic exposure to organic solvents. VI. Formic acid concentration in blood and urine as an indicator of methanol exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 42:241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricknell KS, Finegold SM (1978) Improved method for assay of formic acid by gas-liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 151:374–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (1991) Maximum concentrations at the workplace and biological tolerance values for working materials 1991. VCM, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutkiewicz B, Kończalik J, Karwacki W (1980) Skin absorption and per os administration of methanol in men. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 47:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry DG, Temple WA, McQueen EG (1980) Methanol poisoning. Comparison of urinary methanol concentration with formic acid excretion rate as a measure of occupational exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 47:155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich R, Angerer J (1982) Occupational chronic exposure to organic solvents. X. Biological monitoring parameters for methanol exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 50:341–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinzow B, Ellrott T (1992) Ameisensäure in Urin — ein sinnvoller Parameter der umweltmedizinischen Diagnosik? Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 192:455–461 (in German with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue T, Takeuchi Y, Hisanaga N, Ono Y, Iwata M, Ogata M, Saito K, Sakurai H, Hara I, Matsushita T, Ikeda M (1983) A nationwide survey on organic solvent components in various solvent products. I. Homogeneous products such as thinners, degreasers and reagents. Ind Health 21:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S (1966) Creatinine in urine as an index of urinary excretion rate. Health Phys 12:843–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Industrial Health Association (1991) Recommended occupational exposure limit. Jpn J Ind Health 33:277–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawai T, Yasugi T, Mizunuma K, Horiguchi S, Hirase Y, Uchida Y, Ikeda M (1991a) Methanol in urine as a biological indicator of occupational exposure to methanol vapor. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 63:311–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawai T, Yasugi T, Mizunuma K, Horiguchi S, Hirase Y, Uchida Y, Ikeda M (1991b) Simple method for determination of methanol in blood and its application in occupational health. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 47:797–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawai T, Yasugi T, Mizunuma K, Horiguchi S, Morioka I, Miyashita K, Uchida Y, Ikeda M (1992a) Monitoring of workers exposed to a mixture of toluene, styrene and methanol vapours by means of diffusive sampling, blood analysis and urinalysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 63:429–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawai T, Yasugi T, Mizunuma K, Horiguchi S, Iguchi H, Uchida Y, Iwami O, Ikeda M (1992b) Comparative evaluation of urinalysis and blood analysis as a tool to detect exposure to organic solvents at low concentrations. Int Arch Occup Environ Health (in press)

  • Kumai M, Koizumi A, Saito K, Sakurai H, Inoue T, Takeuchi Y, Hara I, Ogata M, Matsushita T, Ikeda M (1983) A nationwide survey on organic solvent components in various solvent products. II. Heterogenous products such as paints, inks and adhesives. Ind Health 21:185–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee EW, Terzo TS, D'Arcy JB, Gross KB, Schreck RM (1992) Lack of blood formate accumulation in humans following exposure to methanol vapor at the current permissible exposure limit of 200 ppm. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 53:99–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Liesivuori J, Savolainen H (1987) Urinary formic acid as an indicator of occupational exposure to formic acid and methanol. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 48:32–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Mráz M, Flek J, Sedivec V (1978) Is the urinary level of formic acid indicative of man's exposure to methanol vapour? Pracov lék 30:333–337 (in Czech with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata M, Iwamoto T (1990) Enzymic assay of formic acid and gas chromatography of methanol for urinary biological monitoring of exposure to methanol. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 62:227–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainsford SG, Lloyd Davies TA (1965) Urinary excretion of phenol by men exposed to vapour of benzene; a screening test. Br J Ind Med 26:162–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito J, Ikeda M (1988) Solvent constituents in paint, glue and thinner for plastic miniature hobby. Tohoku J Exp Med 155:275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedivec V, Mráz M, Flek J (1981) Biological monitoring of persons exposed to methanol vapours. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 48:257–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood AW (1978) Analysis of formic acid in air samples. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 39:151–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Tada O, Nakaaki K, Fukabori S (1974) On the method of evaluating the exposure to methanol and methyl acetate. J Sci Labour 50:239–248 (in Japanese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tada O, Nakaaki K, Fukabori S, Yonemoto J (1975) An experimental study on the cutaneous absorption of methanol in man. J Sci Labour 51:143–153 (in Japanese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Triebig G, Schaller K-H (1980) A simple and reliable enzymatic assay for the determination of formic acid in urine. Clin Chem Acta 108:355–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida Y, Kawai T, Yasugi T, Ikeda M (1990) Personal monitoring sampler for acetone vapor exposure. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 44:900–904

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yasugi, T., Kawai, T., Mizunuma, K. et al. Formic acid excretion in comparison with methanol excretion in urine of workers occupationally exposed to methanol. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 64, 329–337 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379542

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379542

Key words

Navigation