Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring method for vibration perception threshold of fingers and its application to vibration exposed workers

  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A measuring method for the vibration perception threshold (VPT) of fingers has been developed. The VPTs of 118 and 149 professional forest workers were measured during a compulsory annual health examination in 1979 and 1983, respectively. Also the VPTs of eight pedestal grinders, who were suffering vibration-induced white finger (VWF), were measured in 1979 and 1983. The control group consisted of 20 research workers who had no vibration exposure in the past and no symptoms in their hands. The measuring system for VPT gave repeatable results. The frequency of the most sensitive VPT of vibration exposed workers alternated between 63 and 125 Hz instead of 125 Hz of subjects without vibration exposure. The VPT of the pedestal grinders and forest workers with decreased hand grip force and with vibration-induced white finger were significantly higher than those of the controls. The VPTs of the forest workers decreased slightly and that of the grinders increased from 1979 to 1983. In spite of long vibration exposure in the past and continuing lower level vibration exposure, the increased VPT of forest workers does not seem to be permanent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aatola S, Farkkila M, Korhonen O, Pyykkö I, Starck J (1985) Vibration detection threshold of lumberjacks. Fourth Int Symp Hand-Arm Vibration, May 6–8, 1985, Helsinki. Abstracts, Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, p 63

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aatola S, Starck J, Pyykkö I, Färkkilä M, Korhonen O (1986) Vibration detection threshold of lumberjacks. Second Joint Finnish-GDR Symp on Load and Strain of Central Regulation Processes, 3–4 June 1986, Helsinki, Finland, Extended Abstracts, Institute of Occupational Health, Finland, pp 156–160

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brammer AJ, Taylor W, Piercy JE (1986) Assessing the severity of the neurological component of the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:428–431

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dyck PJ et al (1978) Introduction of automated systems to evaluate touch-pressure, vibration, and thermal sensation in man. Ann Neurol 4:502–510

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gescheider GA, O'Malley MJ, Verrillo RT (1983) Vibrotactile forward masking: evidence for channel independence. J Acoust Soc Am 74:474–485

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gescheider GA, Sklar BF, Van Doren CL, Verrillo RT (1985) Vibratactile forward masking: psychophysical evidence for a triplex theory of cutaneous mechanoreception. J Acoust Soc Am 78 (2):534–543

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg JM, Lindblom U (1979) Standardised method of determining vibratory perception thresholds for diagnosis and screening in neurological investigation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 42:793–803

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harada N, Matsumoto T (1982) Various function tests on the upper extremities and the vibration syndrome. In: Brammer AJ, Taylor W (eds) Vibration effects on the hand and arm in industry. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 71–76

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hayward RA, Griffin MJ (1986) Measures of vibrotactile sensitivity in persons exposed to hand-arm vibration. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:423–427

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hämäläinen H (1982) Tactile and vibrotactile sensibility of the human hand. University of Helsinki

  11. International Organization for Standardization (1986) Mechanical vibration — guidelines for the measurement and the assessment of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration. Geneva (ISO 5349)

  12. Johansson RS, Lundström U, Lundström R (1982) Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glaborous skin in the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacement. Brain Res 244:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kakosy T, Szepesi L (1973) Effects of vibration exposure on the localization of Raynaud's phenomenon in chain saw operators. Work Environ Health 10:134–139

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lamore PJJ, Muijser H, Keemink CJ (1986) Envelope detection of amplitude-modulated high-frequency sinusoidal signals by skin mechanoreceptors. J Acoust Soc Am 79:1082–1085

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lindström I-M, Hagelthorn G, Bjerker N (1982) Vibration perception in persons not previously exposed to local vibration and in vibration-exposed to local vibration and in vibration-exposed workers. In: Brammer AJ, Taylor W (eds) Vibration effects on the hand and arm in industry. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 59–65

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lucas E (1970) Lesion of the peripheral nervous system due to vibration. Scand J Work Environ Health 7:67–79

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lundström R (1985) Effects of local vibration transmitted from ultrasonic devices on vibrotactile perception in the hands of therapists. Ergonomics 28:793–803

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lundström R (1986) Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glaborous skin of the human hand to vibration. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:413–416

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lundström R, Lindmark A (1982) Effects of local vibration on tactile perception in the hands of dentists. J Low Frequency Noise Vibration 1:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pelmear PL, Taylor W, Pearson JCG (1975) Clinical objective tests for vibration white finger. In: Taylor W, Pelmear PL (eds) Vibration white finger in industry. Academic Press, London, pp 53–81

    Google Scholar 

  21. Piercy JE, Brammer AJ, Taylor W (1986) Physiological noise and its influence on vibrotactile perception thresholds. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:417–419

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pyykkö I, Korhonen O, Färkkilä M, Starck J, Aatola S (1982) A longitudinal study of the vibration syndrome in Finnish forestry workers. In: Brammer AJ, Taylor W (eds) Vibration effects on the hand and arm in industry. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 157–168

    Google Scholar 

  23. Saarnio H, Häkkinen V, Ignatius J (1979) Automatic measurement of vibratory sensitivity. In: Juvonen A, Tarvainen M (eds) Proc Third National Meeting on Biophysics and Medical Engineering in Finland, Lappeenranta, pp All/1-3

  24. Seppäläinen AM, Starck J, Härkönen H (1986) High-frequency vibration and sensory nerves. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:420–422

    Google Scholar 

  25. Starck J, Färkkilä M, Aatola S, Pyykkö I, Korhonen O (1983) Vibration syndrome and vibraton in pedestal grinding. Br J Ind Med 40:426–433

    Google Scholar 

  26. Starck J (1984) High impulse acceleration levels in hand-held vibratory tools: an additional factor in hazards associated with the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health 10:171–178

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tadashi N, Kojima Y, Kaji H, Saito K (1986) Diagnostic method for vibration syndrome with social reference to finger skin temperature and vibratory sense threshold. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:251–253

    Google Scholar 

  28. Verrillo RT, Bolanowski Jr, SJ (1986) The effects of skin temperature on the psychophysical responses to vibraton on glabrous and hairy skin. J Acoust Soc Am 80:528–532

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aatola, S., Färkkilä, M., Pyykkö, I. et al. Measuring method for vibration perception threshold of fingers and its application to vibration exposed workers. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 62, 239–242 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379440

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379440

Key words

Navigation