Summary
An enzymatic assay method for the determination of urinary formic acid is described. Formic acid in urine was cleaved to carbon dioxide and water by formic acid dehydrogenase, whereby NAD+ was converted to NADH, which reacted with INT (p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet) in the presence of NAD-diaphorase. The color thus produced was determined at 500 nm. In addition, a simple gas chromatographic method of urinary formic acid is described, in which head space gas of formic acid methylester was applied into the wide bore column. The urinary formic acid concentrations by the enzymatic method agreed well with that by the gas chromatographic method. A simple gas chromatographic method for urinary methanol assay is also described. Acetonitrile was added to an equal volume of urine containing methanol. After centrifugation, the supernatant was injected into gas chromatography (GC). The peaks of urinary methanol and ethanol were separated by GC. Formic acid and methanol in urine of unexposed healthy subjects and workers exposed to methanol were analyzed by the colorimetric and gas chromatographic methods. Geometric mean concentrations of urinary formic acid and methanol in the healthy subjects were 7.82 mg/g creatinine and 1.34 mg/l, respectively. The concentration ratio of formic acid to methanol in the urine of the workers exposed to methanol was calculated to be 3.67 ± 2.10, which agreed with the ratio under a controlled exposure experiment. A slower excretion of formic acid than that of methanol in the urine of a volunteer was also observed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumann K, Angerer J (1979) Occupational chronic exposure to organic solvents. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 42:241–249
Bricknell KS, Finegold SM (1978) Improved method for assay of formic acid by gas-liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 151:374–378
Cairn T, Rogers WM (1983) Acceptable analytical data for trace analysis. Anal Chem 55:54A-57A
Grady S, Osterloh J (1986) Improved enzymic assay for serum formate with colorimetric endpoint. J Anal Toxicol 10:1–5
Heinrich R, Angerer J (1982) Occupational chronic exposure to organic solvents (X, Biological monitoring parameters for methanol exposure). Int Arch Occup Environ Health 50:341–349
Kawai T, Hirashima J, Horiguchi S (1986) Gaschromatographic determination of urinary methanol by direct injection method and the normal level of Japanese subjects. Seikatsu Eisei 30:260–262
Kimmerle G, Eben A (1986) Metabolism studies of N,N-dimethylformamice. Int Arch Arbeitsmed 34:127–136
Liesivuori J, Savolainen H (1987) Urinary formic acid as an indicator of occupational exposure to formic acid and methanol. Am Ind Assoc J 48(1):32–34
Liesivuori J (1988) Biological monitoring and toxicological aspects of formic acid and methanol. In: Liesivuori J (ed) Kuopion Yliopiston Julkaisuja Publications of the University of Kuopio. Kuopio, Helsinki Finland, pp 1–53
Ohmori S, Sumii I, Toyonaga Y, Nakata K, Kawase M (1988) High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of formate as benzimidazol in biological samples. J Chromatogr 426:15–24
Sedivec V, Mraz M, Flek J (1981) Biological monitoring of persons exposed to methanol vapours. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 48:257–271
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogata, M., Iwamoto, T. Enzymatic assay of formic acid and gas chromatography of methanol for urinary biological monitoring of exposure to methanol. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 62, 227–232 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379438
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379438