Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative responses of Achillea millefolium ecotypes to competition and soil type

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Achillea millefolium populations from adjacent sites with zonal and serpentime soil were used to test predictions about the relation between growth and the competitive ability of plants in productive and unproductive environments. Under greenhouse conditions, individually-grown plants from both sources grew larger in serpentine soil than in zonal soil; serpentine plants accumulated 72% more biomass than zonal plants. In zonal soil, zonal plants were 71% larger than serpentine plants, although these differences were not statistically significant, and plants from both sources accumulated much less biomass and were shorter than plants growing in serpentine soil. In a high density, fertilized replacement series, zonal plants were taller and heavier but exhibited no more competitive ability than serpentine plants. The predictions that rapid height growth and biomass accumulation contribute significantly to competitive ability are not supported by our results. Although ecotypic differentiation has occurred between these A. millefolium populations, apparently in response to different soil types, the expression of these heritable differences can be masked by other environmental effects. There has been no apparent “trade-off” in these ecotypes between their response to the physical environment and their competitive ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen S (1974) Chemical analysis of ecological materials. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovics J, Primack RB (1982) Experimental ecological genetics in Plantago. VI. The demography of seedling transplants of P. lanceolata. J Ecol 70:55–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings WD, Mooney HA (1968) The ecology of arctic and alpine plants. Biol Rev 43:481–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP (1953) Non-normality and tests on variances. Biometrika 40:318–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw AD, Snaydon RW (1959) Population differentiation within plant species in response to soil factors. Nature 183:129–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman HO (1965) Cation exchange capacity. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 891–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen JD, Keck D, Hiesey WM (1948) Experimental studies on the nature of species. III. Environmental responses of climatic races of Achillea. Carnegie Inst Wash Publ 581:1–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook SCA, Lefebvre C, McNeilly, T (1972) Competition between metal tolerant and normal plant populations on normal soil. Evolution 26:366–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubenmire R (1968) Plant communities. A textbook of plant synecology. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • del Moral R (1974) Species patterns in the Upper North Fork Teanaway River drainage, Wenatchee Mountains, Washington. Syesis 7:13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschenes JM (1974) Intraspecific competition in experimental populations of weeds. Can J Bot 52:1415–1421

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wit CT (1960) On competition. Versl Landbouwkd Onderz 66:1–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan RW, Sharitz RR (1984) Population dynamics of Ludwigia leptocarpa (Onagraceae) and some factors affecting size hierachies [sic] in a natural population. J Ecol 72:1031–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman C (1974) Perchloric acid procedure for wet-ashing organics for the determination of mercury (and other metals). Anal Chem 46:1606–1609

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson DJ, Risser PG (1982) Evidence for the absence of ecotypic development in Andropogon virginicus (L.) on metalliferous mine wastes. New Phytol 92:589–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Griggs RF (1956) Competition and succession on a Rocky Mountain fellfield. Ecology 37:8–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson HC (1958) Principles concerned in the formation and classification of communities. Bot Rev 24:65–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1982) After description. In: Newman EI (ed) The plant community as a working mechanism. Spec Publ Brit Ecol Soc No 1. Blackwell Scient Publ, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart R (1980) The coexistence of weeds and restricted native plants on serpentine barrens in southeastern Pennsylvania. Ecology 61:688–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey DA, McNeilly T (1975) Competition between metal tolerant and normal plant populations; a field experiment on normal soil. Evolution 29:458–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SS, Bendel RB, Mack RN (1984) Assessing competition among skewed distributions of plant biomass: An application of the jackknife. Biometrics 40:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye RS, Schaffer WM (1981) On the ecological meaning of ratio (de Wit) diagrams in plant ecology. Ecology 62:1679–1681

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston WR, Proctor J (1981) Growth of serpentine and non-serpentine races of Festuca rubra in solutions simulating the chemical conditions in a toxic serpentine soil. J Ecol 69:855–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruckeberg AR (1967) Ecotypic response to ultramafic soils by some plant species of northwestern United States. Brittonia 19:133–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruckeberg AR (1969) Plant life on serpentine and other ferromagnesian rocks in northwestern North America. Syesis 2:15–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Law R, Bradshaw AD, Putwain PD (1977) Life-history variation in Poa annua. Evolution 31:233–246

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN, Harper JL (1977) Interference in dune annuals: Spatial pattern and neighbourhood effects. J Ecol 65:345–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud A, Grime JP (1976) An analysis of competitive ability in three perennial grasses. New Phytol 77:431–435

    Google Scholar 

  • McColley PD (1976) Soil resource inventory. Venatchee National Forest. US For Serv PNR, Portland, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Morishima H, Oka HI (1977) The impact of copper pollution on barnyard grass populations. Jpn J Genet 5:357–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Morishima H, Oka HI (1980) The impact of copper pollution on water foxtail (Alopecurus aequalis Sobol.) populations and winter weed communities in rice fields. Agro-Ecosystems 6:33–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt RM (1958) The geology of the Mount Stuart Area, Washington. PhD. Dissertation. Univ Washington, Seattle, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor J, Woodell SRJ (1975) The ecology of serpentine soils. Adv Ecol Res 9:255–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeldt GE (1979) Ecotypic differentiation in populations of Pinus monticola in north Idaho — Myth or reality? Am Nat 114:627–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai K-I (1955) Competition in plants and its relation to selection. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 20:137–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Savile DBO (1960) Limitations of the competitive exclusion principle. Science 132:1761

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaydon RW, Davies TM (1982) Rapid divergence of plant populations in response to recent changes in soil conditions. Evolution 36:289–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Solbrig OT, Simpson BB (1974) Components of regulation of a population of dandelions in Michigan. J Ecol 62:473–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Solbrig OT, Simpson BB (1977) A garden experiment on competition between biotypes of the common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). J Ecol 65:427–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1960) Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick SI, Black L (1982) The biology of Canadian weeds. 52. Achillea millefolium L. s.l. Can J Plant Sci 62:163–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick SI, Briggs L (1979) The genecology of lawn weeds. III. Cultivation experiments with Achillea millefolium L., Bellis perennis L., Plantago lanceolata L., Plantago major L. and Prunella vulgaris L. collected from lawns and contrasting grassland habitats. New Phytol 83:509–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick SI, Briggs D (1980) The genecology of lawn weeds. VI. The adaptive significance of variation in Achillea millefolium L. as investigated by transplant experiments. New Phytol 85:451–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH, Goodman D (1979) Classifying species according to their demographic strategy. I. Population fluctuations and environmental heterogeneity. Am Nat 113:185–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM, Tinkle DW, Collins JP (1974) Environmental certainty, trophic level, and resource availability in life history evolution. Am Nat 108:805–817

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Higgins, S.S., Mack, R.N. Comparative responses of Achillea millefolium ecotypes to competition and soil type. Oecologia 73, 591–597 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379421

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379421

Key words

Navigation