, Volume 74, Issue 2, pp 247–252 | Cite as

Sequential flowering of neighboring goldenrods and the movements of the flower predator Epicauta pennsylvanica

  • R. J. Goldburg
Original Papers


As neighboring plants flower sequentially, do flower feeders preferentially remain in the area, rather than move to another area with flowering plants? I examined the movements of the meloid beetle Epicauta pennsylvanica, a flower predator specializing on Solidago, in four types of replicated experimental plots — monocultures of Solidago altissima, or S. altissima interplanted with members of the same genus, same family, or different taxonomic orders. I released marked beetles only in the “genus” plots, which contained four species of Solidago, two that bloom before S. altissima. The number of beetles in the genus plots declined steadily as S. altissima came into flower in all the plots; the total number of beetles in all the plots remained fairly constant. I found no evidence that plant neighborhoods affected beetle distribution. Beetles foraging on the early blooming Solidago species did not remain in the genus plots as S. altissima came into flower. In addition, beetles that left the genus plots did not differentially accumulate in any of the other plot types, even though one type of plot was a monoculture with four times the density of S. altissima than the other plots.

Key words

Flowering phenology Facilitation Resource concentration Epicauta pennsylvanica Solidago 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andow DA (1986) Plant diversification and insect population control in agroecosystems. In: Pimentel D (ed) Some Aspects of Integrated Pest Management. Ithaca, New York: Dept. of Entomol., Cornell University, pp 277–368Google Scholar
  2. Atsatt PR, O'Dowd DJ (1976) Plant defense guilds. Science 193:24–29Google Scholar
  3. Baker HG (1963) Evolutionary mechanisms in pollination biology. Science 139:877–883Google Scholar
  4. Baker HG, Cruden RW (1971) Minor parasitism in pollination biology and its community function: the case of Cieba acuminata. Bioscience 21:1127–1129Google Scholar
  5. Cibula DA, Zimmerman M (1984) The effect of plant density on departure decisions: testing the marginal value theorem using bumblebees and Delphinium nelsonii. Oikos 43:154–158Google Scholar
  6. Flaherty D (1969) Ecosystem trophic complexity and willamette mite Eotetranychus willametei Ewing (Acarina: letranychidae). Ecology 50:911–916Google Scholar
  7. Goldburg RJ (1986) Goldenrod, grasshoppers, and the distribution of Epicauta pennsylvanica (Coleoptera: Meloidae). PhD Thesis. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  8. Heads PA, Lawton JH (1983) Studies on the natural enemy complex of the holly leaf miner: the effects of scale on the detection of aggregative responses and the implications for biological control. Oikos 40:267–276Google Scholar
  9. Heinrich B, Raven PM (1972) Energetics and pollination ecology. Science 176:597–602Google Scholar
  10. Kareiva P (1983) Influence of vegetation texture on herbivore populations: resource concentration and herbivore movement. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 257–289Google Scholar
  11. Mathwig JE (1968) Population decline of adults of Epicauta pennsylvanica (Coleoptera: Meloidae) during the fall of 1967. J Kansas Entomol Soc 41:544–548Google Scholar
  12. Perrin RM (1977) Pest management in multiple cropping systems. Agro-ecosystems 3:93–118Google Scholar
  13. Rathcke BJ (1983) Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. In: Real L (ed) Pollination Biology. Academic Press, New York, pp 305–329Google Scholar
  14. Root RB (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol Monogr 43:95–124Google Scholar
  15. Root RB, Tahvanainen JO (1969) Role of winter cress, Barbarea vulgaris, as a temporal host in the seasonal development of the crucifer fauna. Ann Entomol Soc Am 62:852–855Google Scholar
  16. Schmitt J (1983) Flowering plant density and pollinator visitation in Senecio. Oecologia 60:97–102Google Scholar
  17. Sluss RR (1967) Population dynamics of the walnut aphid, Chromaphis juglandicola (Kalt.) in northern California. Ecology 48:41–58Google Scholar
  18. Stanton ML (1983) Spatial effects in the plant community and their effects upon insect search. In: Ahmad S (ed) Herbivorous Insects: Host-Seeking Behavior and Mechanisms. Academic Press, New York, pp 125–157Google Scholar
  19. Tamaki G, Landis BJ, Turner JE (1975a) Psilopa leucostoma: the role of Atriplex patula var. hastata in the early seasonal establishment on sugarbeets in the northwest. Environ Entomol 4:31–32Google Scholar
  20. Tamaki G, Moffitt HR, Turner JE (1975b) The influence of perenial weeds on the abundance of the redbacked cutworm on asparagus. Environ Entomol 4:274–276Google Scholar
  21. Thomson JD (1981) Spatial and temporal components of resource assessment by flower-feeding insects. J Anim Ecol 50:49–59Google Scholar
  22. Waser NM, Real L (1979) Effective mutualism between sequentially flowering plant species. Nature 281:670–672Google Scholar
  23. Weisberg S, Koehler KJ (1982) IVAN Users Manual: Version 2.1. University of Minnesota School of Statistics, Technical Report Number 266Google Scholar
  24. Werner PA, Bradbury IK, Gross RS (1980) The biology of Canadian weeds. 45. Solidago canadensis. Can J Plant Sci 51:1393–1409Google Scholar
  25. Wiens J (1986) Spatial scale and temporal variation in studies of shrubsteppe birds. In: Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community Ecology. Harper and Row, New York, pp 145–153Google Scholar
  26. Wiens JA, Addicott JF, Case TJ, Diamond J (1986) Overview: the importance of spatial and temporal scale in ecological investigations. In: Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community Ecology. Harper and Row, New York, pp 154–172Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. Goldburg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Behavioral BiologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations