Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intersexual differences in phenology and damage by herbivores and pathogens in dioecious Rubus chamaemorus L.

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Shoot development and damage by herbivores and pathogens to male, female and non-floral ramets of the dioecious, perennial herb Rubus chamaemorus were studied in the field during three consecutive years. Leaves on male ramets were usually consumed more by herbivores and attacked more by fungi than were leaves on female ramets. Male ramets unfolded their leaves later than did female ramets. In 1983, when the level of herbivory was comparatively high, ramets that were fully developed in early June were more damaged by herbivores than were ramets that unfolded their leaves later. Non-floral ramets usually showed intermediate levels of damage compared to male and female flowering ramets.

Defoliation caused a greater increase in ramet mortality among females than among males in a field experiment. It is suggested that the different reproductive roles of males and females differently constrain the evolution of defense against herbivores and pathogens in dioecious plants. This may result in intersexual differences both in palatability to herbivores and susceptibility to pathogens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ågren J, Elmqvist T, Tunlid A (1986) Pollination by deceit, floral sex ratios and seed set in dioecious Rubus chamaemorus L. Oecologia (Berlin) 70:332–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Agresti A (1984) Analysis of ordinal categorical data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahti T, Hämet-Ahti L, Jalas J (1968) Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann Bot Fennici 5:169–211

    Google Scholar 

  • von Arx JA (1957) Mycosphaerella joerstadii auf Rubus chamaemorus. Acta Bot Neerl 6:337–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker HG (1976) “Misstake” pollination as a reproductive system with special reference to the Caricaceae. In: J Burley, BT Styles (eds) Tropical trees: variation, breeding and conservation. Academic Press, London, pp 161–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Helenurm K (1981) Floral sex ratios and life history in Aralia nudicaulis (Araliaceae). Evolution 35:752–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa KS (1980) Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:15–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa KS, Opler PA (1978) Why are pistillate inflorescences of Simarouba glauca eaten less than staminate inflorescences? Evolution 32:673–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock SH (1984) Biomass and nutrient allocation in a neotropical dioecious palm. Oecologia (Berlin) 63:426–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, McKendrick JD, Johnson DA (1986) Seasonal changes in carbon fractions in Alaskan tundra plants of differing growth form: implications for herbivory. J Ecol 74:707–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Shaver GR, Kedrowski RA (1986) Environmental controls over carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus fractions in Eriophorum vaginatum in Alaskan tussock tundra. J Ecol 74:167–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS III (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Conn JS (1981) Phenological differentiation between the sexes of Rumex hastatulus: Niche partitioning or different optimal reproductive strategies? Bull Torrey Bot Club 108:374–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Correns C (1928) Bestimmung, Vererbung und Verteilung des Geschlechtes bei den höheren Pflanzen. In: E Baur, M Hartmann (eds) Handbuch der Vererbungswissenschaft, Vol. 2. Borntraeger, Berlin, pp 1–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox PA (1981) Niche partitioning between sexes of dioccious plants. Am Nat 117:295–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox PA (1982) Vertebrate pollination and the maintenance of dioecism in Freycinetia. Am Nat 120:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • DanelL K, Elmqvist T, Ericson L, Salomonsson A (1985) Sexuality in willows and preference by bark-eating voles: defence or not? Oikos 44:82–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurola S, Hicks S, Kaakinen E (1984) Key to Finnish mire types. In: PD Moore (ed) European mires. Academic Press London, pp 11–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatin ŽI (1955) Biologičeskie osobennosti oblepichi i problema vvedenija ee v kul'turu dlja sadovodstva i lesnych polos. Problemy botaniki 2:339–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Gikalov SJa (1935) Otnošenie konopli k boleznjam i vrediteljam. In: NN Griško (ed) Biologija konopli. Tr Vsesojuznogo naučno-issledovatel'skogo instituta konopli 8: 165–172

  • Gross KL, Soule JD (1981) Differences in biomass allocation to reproductive and vegetative structures of male and female plants of a dioecious, perennial herb, Silene alba (Miller) Krause. Am J Bot 68:801–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock JF, Bringhurst RS (1980) Sexual dimorphism in the strawberry Fragaria chiloensis. Evolution 34:762–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL, White J (1974) The demography of plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:419–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide F (1927) Observations on the pollination of some flowers in the Dutch East Indies. Dan Bot Ark 5:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1984) The annual cycle of Osyris quadripartita, a hemiparasitic dioecious shrub of Mediterranean scrublands. J Ecol 72:1065–1078

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippa H, Koponen S (1975) On the damage caused by the species of Galerucella (Col., Chrysomelidae) on cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus L.) in Finland and northern Norway. Rep Kevo Subarctic Res Stat 12:54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultén E (1971) The circumpolar plants. II. Sv Vetenskapsakad Handl Ser 4. 13:1 Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay QON, Lack AJ, Bamber FC, Davies CR (1984) Differences between sexes in floral morphology, nectar production and insect visits in a dioecious species, Silene dioica. New Phytol 98:515–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1977) Secondary sex characters in plants. Bot Rev 43:177–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehwing WF (1933) Physico-chemical aspects of sex in plants. Proc Soc Exp Biol & Med 30:1215–1220

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett Doust J, Lovett Doust L (1985) Sex ratios, clonal growth and herbivory in Rumex acetosella. In: J White (ed) Studies on plant demography: a festschrift for John L. Harper. Academic Press, London, pp 327–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Neverova LA (1971) Sootnošenie raznopolych osobej i soderžanie v nich tanidov u nekotorych vidov ivy v okrestnostjach Ural'ska. Rast resursy 7:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyekwelu SS, Harper JL (1979) Sex ratio and niche differentiation in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Nature 282:609–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Østgård O (1964) Molteundersøkelser i Nord-Norge. Investigations on Cloudberries (Rubus chamaemorus L.) in North-Norway. Forsk Fors Landbr 15:409–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Putwain PD, Harper JL (1972) Studies in the dynamics of plant populations. V. Mechanisms governing the sex ratio in Rumex acetosa and R. acetosella. J Ecol 60:113–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead SA, Perrin PW (1972a) Asterobolus: a new parasitic hyphomycete with a novel dispersal mechanism. Can J Bot 50:409–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead SA, Perrin PW (1972b) Asterobolus: a synonym of Valdensia. Can J Bot 50:2083–2084

    Google Scholar 

  • Resvoll TR (1929) Rubus chamaemorus L. A morphological-biological study. Nyt Mag Naturvid 67:55–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Schladweiler P (1968) Feeding behavior of incubating ruffed grouse females. J Wildl Mgmt 32:426–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfield JF (1937) Certain physico-chemical aspects of sexual differentiation in Lychnis dioica. Am J Bot 24:710–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG Bertin RI (1983) Male competition female choice, and sexual selection in plants. In: L Real (ed) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, pp 109–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor K (1971) Biological flora of the British Isles. Rubus chamaemorus L. J Ecol 59:293–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace CS, Rundel PW (1979) Sexual dimorphism and resource allocation in male and female shrubs of Simmondsia chinensis. Oecologia (Berlin) 44:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman JK, Lechowitz MJ (1982) Responses to moisture stress in male and female plants of Rumex acetosella L. (Polygonaceae). Oecologia (Berlin) 53:305–309

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest Site Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-901 83, Umeå, Sweden

    J. Ågren

Authors
  1. J. Ågren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ågren, J. Intersexual differences in phenology and damage by herbivores and pathogens in dioecious Rubus chamaemorus L.. Oecologia 72, 161–169 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379262

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379262

Key words

Search

Navigation