Skip to main content
Log in

Summary

An experimental study of the physiological effects of brush saw operation was performed on eight professional agricultural workers. The experiments were carried out in the field under practical working conditions. Aesthesiometric thresholds (two-point discrimination and depth sense perception), manipulative dexterity, pinch grip force and fingertip skin temperature (FST) were measured before and after exposure to different combinations of static load (handle holding), noise and vibration by using new production brush saws for 5 to 15 min. The changes in the peripheral circulatory, sensorineural and muscular functions of the brush saw workers were not found to be significantly different under the various exposure conditions. Static load accounted for the major part of the changes in aesthesiometric thresholds, pinch grip force and FST after brush saw operation. With respect to baseline measurements, no significant difference in manipulative skill was observed after each exposure period. The weighted vibration accelerations from the right and left handles of a brush saw were 3.13 and 1.80 m/s2, respectively. The assessment of brush saw vibration exposure according to ISO 5349 and the results of FST measurements were consistent with the findings of some epidemiological surveys indicating a low risk of vibration-induced white finger among brush sawyers. This investigation pointed out that the increase in the aesthesiometric thresholds was mainly determined by handle holding, and that the reduction in gripping force during actual work was related to the duration of brush saw operation. Therefore, prolonged static overload on the nerves, muscles and joints of the hand-arm system could explain the increased risk of musculoskeletal and sensorineural disorders found among brush saw users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bjerker N, Kylin B, Lindström IG (1972) Changes in the vibratory sensation threshold after exposure to powerful vibration. Ergonomics 4:399–406

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bovenzi M (1987) Finger thermometry in the assessment of subjects with vibration-induced white finger. Scand J Work Environ Health 13:348–351

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bovenzi M, Zadini A (1989) Quantitative estimation of aesthesiometric thresholds for assessing impaired tactile sensation in workers exposed to vibration. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 61:431–435

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brammer AJ, Taylor W, Lundborg G (1987) Sensorineural stages of the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health 13:279–283

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson W, Samueloff S, Taylor W, Wasserman D (1979) Instrumentation of measurement of sensory loss in the fingertips. J Occup Med 21:260–264

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fessel WJ (1975) Rheumatology for clinicians. Stratton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Futatsuka M (1979) A study on the vibration hazards due to using bush cutters. Jpn J Health 21:269–273

    Google Scholar 

  8. Futatsuka R (1984) Epidemiological studies of vibration disease due to brush saw operation. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 54:251–260

    Google Scholar 

  9. Futatsuka M, Yasutake N, Sakurai T, Matsumoto T (1985) Comparative study of vibration disease among operators of vibrating tools by factor analysis. Br J Med 42:260–266

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haines T, Chong J, Verrall AB, Julian J, Bernholz C, Spears R, Muir DCF (1988) Aesthesiometric threshold changes over the course of a workshift in miners exposed to hand-arm vibration. Br J Ind Med 45:106–111

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hasiguchi T, Sakakibara H, Yamada S (1989) Changes of skin blood flow in the fingers and dorsum of the foot in chain saw operation. In: Proc Fifth Int Conf on Hand-Arm Vibration. Kanazawa, Japan, p 34

  12. Heslop J, Coggon D, Acheson ED (1983) The prevalence of intermittent digital ischaemia (Raynaud's phenomenon) in a general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 33:85–89

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hisashige A, Kume I, Ogawa T, Taniguchi K, Nakagiri S, Aoyama H (1979) A study on vibration syndrome among bush cleaner operators. Jpn J Ind Health 21:683–684

    Google Scholar 

  14. International Organisation for Standardisation (1986) Forestry machinery — portable brush saws — measurement of hand-transmitted vibration. ISO/DIS 7916, Geneva

  15. International Organisation for Standardisation (1986) Mechanical vibration — guidelines for the measurement and the assessment of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration. ISO 5349, Geneva

  16. International Section for Research of the International Social Security Association (1989) Vibration at work. Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité (INRS), Paris

    Google Scholar 

  17. Itoh N, Kasamatsu T, Shiomi S, Iwata H (1978) Vibration disease due to grass cutters. Jpn J Ind Health 20:451–452

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maricq HR, Weinrich MC, Keil JE, LeRoy EC (1986) Prevalence of Raynaud phenomenon in the general population. A preliminary study by questionnaire. J Chron Dis 39:423–427

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miyakita T, Miura H, Futatsuka M (1987) An experimental study of the physiological effects of chain saw operation. Br J Ind Med 44:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nishiyama K, Watanabe S (1981) Temporary threshold shift of vibration sensation after clasping a vibrating handle. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 49:21–23

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schäfer N, Dupuis H, Hartung E (1984) Acute effects of shock-type vibration transmitted to the hand-arm system. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 55:49–59

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scheffer M, Dupuis H (1989) Effects of combined hand-arm vibration and cold skin temperature. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 61:375–378

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor W, Pelmear PL, Pearson JCG (1975) Vibration-induced white finger epidemiology. In: Taylor W, Pelmear PL (eds) Vibration white finger in industry. Academic Press, London, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  24. Verberk MM, Sallé HJA, Kempers O (1985) Vibratory and tactile sense of the fingers after working with sanders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 56:217–223

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wikström BO, Friberg M, Isaksson A (1988) Work load, vibration and noise exposure for lumberjacks. In: Proc United Kingdom and French joint meeting on human response to vibration, Vandoevre, France, pp 1–11

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bovenzi, M., Peretti, A., Zadini, A. et al. Physiological reactions during brush saw operation. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 62, 445–449 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379061

Key words

Navigation