Summary
Isolated and mixed continuous cultures of Daphnia hyalina and Diaphanosoma brachyurum in lake water were maintained under laboratory conditions to elucidate demographic effects of competition. Population dynamics curves were obtained. Interspecific competition was revealed by the decrease in the average density of animals in the mixed versus isolated cultures and by the extinction of one species in the presence of the other. Within the first 50 days either Diaphanosoma (4 cases) or Daphnia (1 case) was the superior competitor, depending on the initial conditions. Further cultivation resulted in the extinction of Diaphanosoma in the mixed cultures. There were no statistically significant differences between the maximum rates of population increase (r m ) in Daphnia and Diaphanosoma at the concentration of edible algae about 2·105 μm3ml-1(0.293 and 0.286 days-1, respectively). Time lags for density-dependent parameters of the populations were evaluated by means of rank cross-correlations. Regardless of the species identity the time lags of fecundity, birth rate, and the rate of population growth were significantly higher in the superior competitor. The initial conditions of culturing affected the time lags which in their turn influenced the outcome of the interaction. Enhanced competitive ability due to the maximized time lags in Daphnia was not associated with the loss of population stability. Conversely, it brought about destabilization of Diaphanosoma populations which seemed to be the ultimate cause of its extinction observed in the end of the experiment. Time lag of the population growth rate was well predicted based on the half-sum of time lags in birth and death rates (r2=0.80, P<0.001). Daphnia responded to competition with a sharp shortening of the time lags of fecundity, birth rate, and the population growth rate. It increased clutch size and showed inverse relationship between the fecundity time lag and average fecundity even though it was strongly suppressed by Diaphanosoma. The competitive ability was not related to the percentage of adults in the populations. In contrast to the current belief the major result of interspecific competition in the experiment was not a decrease in the rate of population growth but was a reduction in population time lags.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bottrell HH, Duncan A, Gliwicz ZM, Grygierek E, Herzig A, Hillbricht-Ilkowska A, Kurasawa H, Larsson P, Weglenska T (1976) A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Norw J Zool 24:419–456
DeMott WR, Kerfoot WC (1982) Competition among cladocerans: nature of the interaction between Bosmina and Daphnia. Ecology 63:1949–1966
Goulden CE, Henry LL (1984) Lipid energy reserves and their role in Cladocera. In: Meyers DG, Strickler JR (eds). Trophic interactions within aquatic ecosystems. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 167–185
Goulden CE, Hornig LL (1980) Population oscillations and energy reserves in planktonic cladocera and their consequences to competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:1716–1720
Goulden CE, Henry LL, Tessier AJ (1982) Body size, energy reserves, and competitive ability in three species of Cladocera. Ecology 63:1780–1789
Halbach U (1979) Introductory remarks: strategies in population research exemplified by rotifer population dynamics. Fortschr Zool 25:1–27
Horton PA, Rowan M, Webster KE, Peters RH (1979) Browsing and grazing by cladoceran filter feeders. Can J Zool 57:206–212
Hutchinson GE (1948) Circular causal systems in ecology. Annal New York Acad Sci 50:221–246
Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95:137–146
Jacobs J (1977) Coexistence of similar zooplankton species by differential adaptation to reproduction and escape, in an environment with fluctuating food and enemy densities. I. A model. Oecologia (Berlin) 29:233–247
Knisely K, Geller W (1986) Selective feeding of four zooplankton species on natural lake phytoplankton. Oecologia (Berlin) 69:86–94
Lynch M (1978) Complex interactions between natural coexploiters — Daphnia and Ceriodaphnia. Ecology 59:552–564
Lynch M (1982) How well does the Edmondson — Paloheimo model approximate instantaneous birth rates? Ecology 63:12–18
Mardia KV, Zemroch PJ (1978) Tables of the F- and related distributions with algorithms. Academic Press, London (Russian translation by MS Nikulin, 1984, Nauka, Moscow)
Matveev VF (1976) An estimation of competition between three zooplankton (Cladocera) species in field conditions using multiple regression analysis. Zhurnal Obschey Biol 37:822–830 (In Russian)
Matveev V (1983) Estimating competition in cladocerans using data on dynamics of clutch size and population density. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 68:785–798
Matveev V (1985) Competition and population time lags in Bosmina (Cladocera, Crustacea). Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 70:491–508
Matveev VF (1987) Competitive exclusion in planktonic cladocerans of different families under conditions of a resource spectrum. Izvestya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Biologicheskaya (In Russian) (in press)
Matveev VF, Mnatsakanova EA (1987) Food limitation of two Bosmina species (Cladocera, Crustacea) in a temperate lake. Izvestya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Biologicheskaya N 3:377–387
May RM (1974) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Monographs in population biology 6, 2nd edition. Princeton, New Jersey
May RM (1981) Models for single populations. In: May RM (ed) Theoretical ecology, 2nd edition. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 5–29
McCauley E, Murdoch WW (1987) Cyclic and stable populations: plankton as paradigm. Am Nat 129:97–121
Neill WE (1975) Experimental studies of microcrustacean competition, community composition and efficiency of resource utilization. Ecology 56:809–826
Nikolaev TM, Fenyova IYu (1980) Izucheniye pishchevoi konkurentsii mezhdu trmya vidami vetvistousykh rakoobraznykh (Cladocera, Crustacea). Biol Nauki 12:30–38 (In Russian).
Odum EP (1983) Basic ecology. CBS College Publishing, Philadelphia
Paloheimo JE (1974) Calculation of instantaneous birth rate. Limnol Oceanogr 18:692–694
Pavlyutin AV (1980) Soothnoshenie pischevoi tsennosty zhivogo i myortvogo v detrite. In: Vinberg GG (ed) Trophicheskie svyazi presnovodnykh bespozvonochnykh. USSR Academy of Sciences, Leningrad, pp 120–124 (In Russian)
Pianka ER (1978) Evolutionary ecology. Harper and Row, New York
Polishchuk LV, Ghilarov AM (1981) Comparison of two approaches used to calculate zooplankton mortality. Limnol Oceanogr 26:1161–1167
Pratt DM (1943) Analysis of population development in Daphnia at different temperatures. Biol Bull 85:116–140
Seitz A (1980) The coexistence of three species of Daphnia in the Klostersee. I. Field studies on the dynamics of reproduction. Oecologia (Berlin) 45:117–130
Seitz A (1984) Are there allelopathic interactions in zooplankton? Laboratory experiments with Daphnia. Oecologia (Berlin) 62:94–96
Slobodkin LB (1954) Population dynamics in Daphnia obtusa Kurz. Ecol Monogr 24:69–88
Smirnov NN (1986) (ed) Lake Glubokoe. Hydrobiologia 141
Sustchenya LM, Semenchenko VP, Semenyuk GA (1986) Growth and production of Daphnia magna Straus at different trophic and temperature conditions. Zhurnal Obshey Biol 47:640–647 (In Russian)
Taylor BE (1985) Effects of food limitation on growth and reproduction of Daphnia. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnol 21:285–296
Vanni MJ (1986) Fish predation and zooplankton demography: indirect effects. Ecology 67:337–354
Williamson M (1972) The analysis of biological populations, Arnold, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matveev, V.F. Effect of competition on the demography of planktonic cladocerans — Daphnia and Diaphanosoma . Oecologia 74, 468–477 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378946
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378946