Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of competition on the demography of planktonic cladocerans — Daphnia and Diaphanosoma

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Isolated and mixed continuous cultures of Daphnia hyalina and Diaphanosoma brachyurum in lake water were maintained under laboratory conditions to elucidate demographic effects of competition. Population dynamics curves were obtained. Interspecific competition was revealed by the decrease in the average density of animals in the mixed versus isolated cultures and by the extinction of one species in the presence of the other. Within the first 50 days either Diaphanosoma (4 cases) or Daphnia (1 case) was the superior competitor, depending on the initial conditions. Further cultivation resulted in the extinction of Diaphanosoma in the mixed cultures. There were no statistically significant differences between the maximum rates of population increase (r m ) in Daphnia and Diaphanosoma at the concentration of edible algae about 2·105 μm3ml-1(0.293 and 0.286 days-1, respectively). Time lags for density-dependent parameters of the populations were evaluated by means of rank cross-correlations. Regardless of the species identity the time lags of fecundity, birth rate, and the rate of population growth were significantly higher in the superior competitor. The initial conditions of culturing affected the time lags which in their turn influenced the outcome of the interaction. Enhanced competitive ability due to the maximized time lags in Daphnia was not associated with the loss of population stability. Conversely, it brought about destabilization of Diaphanosoma populations which seemed to be the ultimate cause of its extinction observed in the end of the experiment. Time lag of the population growth rate was well predicted based on the half-sum of time lags in birth and death rates (r2=0.80, P<0.001). Daphnia responded to competition with a sharp shortening of the time lags of fecundity, birth rate, and the population growth rate. It increased clutch size and showed inverse relationship between the fecundity time lag and average fecundity even though it was strongly suppressed by Diaphanosoma. The competitive ability was not related to the percentage of adults in the populations. In contrast to the current belief the major result of interspecific competition in the experiment was not a decrease in the rate of population growth but was a reduction in population time lags.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bottrell HH, Duncan A, Gliwicz ZM, Grygierek E, Herzig A, Hillbricht-Ilkowska A, Kurasawa H, Larsson P, Weglenska T (1976) A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Norw J Zool 24:419–456

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMott WR, Kerfoot WC (1982) Competition among cladocerans: nature of the interaction between Bosmina and Daphnia. Ecology 63:1949–1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden CE, Henry LL (1984) Lipid energy reserves and their role in Cladocera. In: Meyers DG, Strickler JR (eds). Trophic interactions within aquatic ecosystems. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 167–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden CE, Hornig LL (1980) Population oscillations and energy reserves in planktonic cladocera and their consequences to competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:1716–1720

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden CE, Henry LL, Tessier AJ (1982) Body size, energy reserves, and competitive ability in three species of Cladocera. Ecology 63:1780–1789

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbach U (1979) Introductory remarks: strategies in population research exemplified by rotifer population dynamics. Fortschr Zool 25:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton PA, Rowan M, Webster KE, Peters RH (1979) Browsing and grazing by cladoceran filter feeders. Can J Zool 57:206–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1948) Circular causal systems in ecology. Annal New York Acad Sci 50:221–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95:137–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1977) Coexistence of similar zooplankton species by differential adaptation to reproduction and escape, in an environment with fluctuating food and enemy densities. I. A model. Oecologia (Berlin) 29:233–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Knisely K, Geller W (1986) Selective feeding of four zooplankton species on natural lake phytoplankton. Oecologia (Berlin) 69:86–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M (1978) Complex interactions between natural coexploiters — Daphnia and Ceriodaphnia. Ecology 59:552–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M (1982) How well does the Edmondson — Paloheimo model approximate instantaneous birth rates? Ecology 63:12–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardia KV, Zemroch PJ (1978) Tables of the F- and related distributions with algorithms. Academic Press, London (Russian translation by MS Nikulin, 1984, Nauka, Moscow)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matveev VF (1976) An estimation of competition between three zooplankton (Cladocera) species in field conditions using multiple regression analysis. Zhurnal Obschey Biol 37:822–830 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matveev V (1983) Estimating competition in cladocerans using data on dynamics of clutch size and population density. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 68:785–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Matveev V (1985) Competition and population time lags in Bosmina (Cladocera, Crustacea). Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 70:491–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Matveev VF (1987) Competitive exclusion in planktonic cladocerans of different families under conditions of a resource spectrum. Izvestya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Biologicheskaya (In Russian) (in press)

  • Matveev VF, Mnatsakanova EA (1987) Food limitation of two Bosmina species (Cladocera, Crustacea) in a temperate lake. Izvestya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Biologicheskaya N 3:377–387

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1974) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Monographs in population biology 6, 2nd edition. Princeton, New Jersey

  • May RM (1981) Models for single populations. In: May RM (ed) Theoretical ecology, 2nd edition. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 5–29

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley E, Murdoch WW (1987) Cyclic and stable populations: plankton as paradigm. Am Nat 129:97–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill WE (1975) Experimental studies of microcrustacean competition, community composition and efficiency of resource utilization. Ecology 56:809–826

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaev TM, Fenyova IYu (1980) Izucheniye pishchevoi konkurentsii mezhdu trmya vidami vetvistousykh rakoobraznykh (Cladocera, Crustacea). Biol Nauki 12:30–38 (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1983) Basic ecology. CBS College Publishing, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloheimo JE (1974) Calculation of instantaneous birth rate. Limnol Oceanogr 18:692–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlyutin AV (1980) Soothnoshenie pischevoi tsennosty zhivogo i myortvogo v detrite. In: Vinberg GG (ed) Trophicheskie svyazi presnovodnykh bespozvonochnykh. USSR Academy of Sciences, Leningrad, pp 120–124 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1978) Evolutionary ecology. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Polishchuk LV, Ghilarov AM (1981) Comparison of two approaches used to calculate zooplankton mortality. Limnol Oceanogr 26:1161–1167

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt DM (1943) Analysis of population development in Daphnia at different temperatures. Biol Bull 85:116–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz A (1980) The coexistence of three species of Daphnia in the Klostersee. I. Field studies on the dynamics of reproduction. Oecologia (Berlin) 45:117–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz A (1984) Are there allelopathic interactions in zooplankton? Laboratory experiments with Daphnia. Oecologia (Berlin) 62:94–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin LB (1954) Population dynamics in Daphnia obtusa Kurz. Ecol Monogr 24:69–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov NN (1986) (ed) Lake Glubokoe. Hydrobiologia 141

  • Sustchenya LM, Semenchenko VP, Semenyuk GA (1986) Growth and production of Daphnia magna Straus at different trophic and temperature conditions. Zhurnal Obshey Biol 47:640–647 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BE (1985) Effects of food limitation on growth and reproduction of Daphnia. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnol 21:285–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanni MJ (1986) Fish predation and zooplankton demography: indirect effects. Ecology 67:337–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1972) The analysis of biological populations, Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matveev, V.F. Effect of competition on the demography of planktonic cladocerans — Daphnia and Diaphanosoma . Oecologia 74, 468–477 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378946

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378946

Key words

Navigation