Skip to main content
Log in

Rainfall and decomposition in the chihuahuan desert

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We tested the hypotheses that rates of decomposition in a desert should be higher following single large rain events of 25 mm than evenly spaced 6 mm events and that supplemental rainfall should result in higher populations of soil biota. There were no significant differences in mass losses of creosotebush, Larrea tridentata, leaf litter on plots receiving water supplementation and no added water. On some sampling dates, there were higher mass losses in the 6 mm·week-1 treatment. Weekly rainfall produced higher coefficients of variation in mass losses than the other rainfall regimes. A single event pulse compared with weekly pulses of rainfall during the normal “dry” period resulted in no differences in mass losses. Microarthropods and nematodes exhibited numerical responses to supplemental rainfall but the litter microflora did not. These studies provide direct experimental evidence that the conventional wisdom linking decomposition to rainfall in deserts is wrong. The studies also suggest that the effects of litter fauna on surface litter decomposition are minimal; therefore, future studies should focus on activites of the microflora.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babuick LA, Paul EH (1970) The use of flourescein iso-thiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass in grassland soil. Canadian J Microbiol 16:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Beathey JC (1974) Phenological events and their environmental triggers in Mojave desert ecosystems. Ecology 55:856–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Coolen WA (1979) Methods for the extraction of Meloidogyne spp. and other nematodes from roots and soil. In: Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne species). Systematics, Biology and Control, Lamberti F, Taylor CE (eds) Academic Press, NY, pp 317–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler DW (1920) A method for estimating the number of active protozoa in the soil. J Agric Sci 10:135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkins NZ, Whitford WG (1982) The role of microarthropods and nematodes in decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem. Oecologia (Berlin) 55:303–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkins NZ, Steinberger Y, Whitford WG (1982) Factors affecting the applicability of the AET model for decomposition in arid environments. Ecology 63:579–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot ET, Coleman DC (1977) Soil protozoan dynamics in a short grass prairie. Soil Biol Biochem 6:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton FE (1972) Climatic Guide, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 1851–1971. New Mexico State Univ Agric Res Dept 230:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw GN, Seely MK (1982) Ecology of Desert Organisms. Longman, London, p 194

    Google Scholar 

  • Meentemeyer V (1978) Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology 59:465–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy Meir I (1973) Desert ecosystems: Environment and producers. Ann Ev Ecol Syst 4:25–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen FCW (1950) Quantitative estimates of filamentous algae. Trans Amer Micros Soc 59:272–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos PF, Elkins NZ, Steinberger Y, Whitford WG (1984) A comparison of surface and buried Larrea tridentata leaf litter decomposition in North American hot deserts. Ecology 65:278–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer D, Steinberger Y, Whitford WG (1985) The failure of nitrogen and lignin control of decomposition in a North American desert. Oecologia (Berlin) (in press)

  • Singh BN (1946) A method of estimating the numbers of soil protozoa, especially amoebae, based on their differential feeding on bacteria. Ann Appl Biol 33:112–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FS (1969) Biometry, San Francisco, WH Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tevis L Jr (1958) Germination and growth of ephemerals induced by sprinkling a sandy desert. Ecology 39:681–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Went FW (1949) Ecology of desert plants. II. The effect of rain and temperature on germination and growth. Ecology 30:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG, Meentemeyer V, Seastedt TR, Cromack K Jr, Crossley DA, Santos P, Todd RL, Waide JB (1981) Exceptions to the AET model: deserts and clear-cut forests. Ecology 62:275–277

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitford, W.G., Steinberger, Y., MacKay, W. et al. Rainfall and decomposition in the chihuahuan desert. Oecologia 68, 512–515 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378764

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378764

Keywords

Navigation