Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of occupational exposure to 4,4′-methylene-bis-(2-chloroaniline) “MOCA” by a new sensitive method for biological monitoring

  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A new specific and sensitive method for the urinary determination of 4,4′-methylene-bis-(2-chloroaniline) (“MOCA”), a known carcinogen in rats, mice and dogs, has been developed. After a brief study on rats to determine some peculiarities in “MOCA” urinary excretion, this method was used to assess occupational exposure in French industrial firms. Both the manufacture of “MOCA” and its use as a curing agent in the production of polyurethane elastomers were surveyed. “MOCA” excretion levels were distributed from non-detectable (<0.5 μg/l) up to 1600 μg/l. Concentrations of N-acetyl metabolites, when present, were largely lower than “MOCA” levels. The results seemed to reflect workers' overall exposure fairly. Preventive measures following analytical determinations often led to an obvious lowering of excretion levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chin B, Tobes MC, Han SS (1983) Absorption of 4,4′-methylene-bis-(2-chloroaniline) by human skin. Environ Res 32:167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer PB, Rickard J, Robertson S (1981) The metabolism and distribution of 4,4′-methy-lene-bis-(2-chloroaniline) (MBOCA) in rats. J Appl Toxicol 1: 317–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann E, Steinhoff D (1970) Leber- und Lungentumoren nach 3,3′-Dichlor-4,4′-diaminodiphenylmethan bei Ratten. Z Krebsforsch 74:28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosein HR, Van Roosmalen PB (1978) Acute exposure to methylene-bis-orthochloroaniline (MOCA). Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 39:496–497

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (1977) Precision of test methods—determination of repeatability and reproducibility. Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 5725 of 20 October 1977

  • Kommineni C, Groth DH, Frockt IJ, Volker RW, Stanovick RP (1979) Determination of the tumorigenic potential of methylene-bis-orthochloroaniline. J Environ Pathol Toxicol 2:149–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Linch AL, O'Connor GB, Barnes JR, Killian AS, Neeld WE (1971) Methylene-bis-orthochloroaniline (MOCA®): evaluation of hazards and exposure control. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 32:802–817

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann J, Choi E, Yamasaki E, Ames BN (1975) Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test-assay of 300 chemicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci [USA] 72:5135–5139

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen CA, Maslansky CJ, Crescenzi SB, Williams GM (1981) The genotoxicity of 4,4′-methylene-bis-2-chloroaniline in rat, mouse and hamster hepatocytes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 58:231–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Meigs JW, Sciarini LJ, Van Sandt WA (1954) Skin penetration by diamines of the benzidine group. Arch Ind Hyg 9:122–132

    Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH (1978) Special hazard review with control recommendations for 4,4′-methylene-bis-(2-chloroaniline). DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No 78-188

  • NIOSH (1981) 4,4′-Methylene-bis-(o-chloroaniline) (MOCA) in urine. NIOSH Manual of analytical methods 7:342.1–342.9

    Google Scholar 

  • Russfield AB, Homburger F, Boger E, Van Dongen CG, Weisburger EK, Weisburger JH (1975) The carcinogenic effect of 4,4′-methylene-bis-(2-chloroaniline) in mice and rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 31:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhoff D, Grundmann E (1971) Zur cancerogenen Wirkung von 3,3′-Dichlor-4,4′-diamino-diphenylmethan bei Ratten. Naturwissenschaften 58:578

    Google Scholar 

  • Stula EF, Sherman H, Zapp JA (1971) Experimental neoplasia in ChR-CD rats with the oral administration of 3,3′-dichlorobenzidine, 4,4′-methylene-bis-(2-chloroaniline) and 4,4′-methylene-bis-(2-methylaniline). Soc Toxicol 10th Ann Meet, Washington and summary in Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 19:380

    Google Scholar 

  • Stula EF, Sherman H, Zapp JA, Clayton JW (1975) Experimental neoplasia in rats from oral administration of 3,3′-dichlorobenzidine, 4,4′-methylene-bis-(2-chloroaniline) and 4,4′-methylene-bis-(2-methylaniline). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 31:159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Stula EF, Barnes JR, Sherman H, Reinhardt CF, Zapp JA (1977) Urinary bladder tumours in dogs from 4,4′-methylene-bis-(2-chloroaniline). J Environ Pathol Toxicol 1:31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Roosmalen PB, Klein AL, Drummond I (1981) Determination of 3,3′-dichloro-4,4′-di-aminodiphenylmethane (MOCA) in urine. In: Egan H, Fishbein L, Castegnaro M, O'Neill IK, Bartsch H, Davis W (eds) Environmental carcinogens. Selected methods of analysis, vol 4—Some aromatic amines and azo dyes in the general and industrial environment. Int Agency for Res on Cancer, Lyon (IARC Scientific Publications No 40:183–191)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ducos, P., Maire, C. & Gaudin, R. Assessment of occupational exposure to 4,4′-methylene-bis-(2-chloroaniline) “MOCA” by a new sensitive method for biological monitoring. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 55, 159–167 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378378

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378378

Key words

Navigation