Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aging effect on nectar production in two clones of Asclepias syriaca

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca), flower nectar volumes, concentration and sugar production varied according to the age of the sampled blossoms. In individual blossoms, nectar production peaked daily at 0800 hr. Peak production during the life of the flower occurred on the second day of flowering, 50 h after anthesis, and nectar production ceased after 120 h. The amount and quality of nectar were affected by microclimatic conditions and varied between clones. However, the same secretory patterns were found in all flowers studied. This age dependent nectar secretion combined with the sequential mode of flowering found on a single stem, results in substantial reward for extended periods to nectar feeders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beutler R (1953) Nectar. Bee World 34:106–116, 123–136, 156–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutler R, Schöntag A (1940) Über die Nektarabscheidung einiger Nutzpflanzen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 28:254–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne CA, Zerban FW (1941) Physical and chemical methods of sugar analysis. 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Collison C (1973) Nectar secretion and how it affects the activity of honey bees in the pollination of hybrid picling cucumbers, Cucumis sativa L., M.S. thesis, Michigan State Univ East Lansing

  • Corbet SA, Willmer PG, Beament JWL, Unwin DM, Prŷs-Jones OE (1979) Post-secretory determinants of sugar concentration in nectar. Plant Cell Envir 2:293–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewert R (1936) Honigen and Samenansatz des Rotklees 1936. Deutsch Imkerführer 10:476–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology. 3rd ed. Pergamon Press NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Free JB (1970) Insect pollination of crops. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Galil J, Zeroni M (1965) Nectar system of Asclepias curassavica. Botan Gaz 126:144–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber H (1956) Die Abhängigkeit der Nektarsekretion von Temperatur, Luft- und Bodenfeuchtigkeit. Planta 48:47–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaycox ER (1976) Beekeeping in the mid-west. Univ Illinois College Agri Coop Ext Serv Circ 1125

  • Johnson LH (1946) Nectar secretion in clover. Effect of soil and climate on honey production. New Zealand Agri 73:111–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Loper GM, Waller GD, Berdel RL (1976) Effect of flower age on sucrose content in nectar of Citrus. Hort Sci 11:416–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuse BJD (1961) The story of pollination. Ronald Press Co NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Oertel E (1944) Variation in the sugar concentration of some southern nectars. J Econ Ent 3:525–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Park PW (1929) The influence of humidity upon sugar concentration in the nectar of various plants. J Econ Ent 22:534–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellett FC (1976) American honey plants. Dadant and Sons, Hamilton, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival M (1965) Floral biology. Pergamon Press NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Raw GR (1953) The effect on nectar secretion of removing nectar from flowers. Bee World 34:32–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson IA, Oertel E (1975) Sources of nectar and pollen. In: Dadant and Sons (eds) The hive and the honey bee, Dadant and Sons, Hamilton, Illinois p 283–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuel RW (1975) The production of nectar. In: Dadant and Sons (eds) The hive and the honey bee, Dadant and Sons, Hamilton, Illinois p 265–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuel RW, Shivas JA (1953) The influence of soil physical condition during the flowering period on nectar production in snapdragon. Plant Physiol 28:645–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick EE (1982) “Lucky Hit” nectar rewards and energetics of plant and pollinators. Comp Physiol Ecol 7:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick EE, Loper GM, Sadwick SE (1981) Nectar production, composition, energetics and pollinator attractiveness in spring flowers of western New York. Amer J Bot 68:994–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick EE, Southwick AK (1980) Energetics of feeding on tree sap by ruby-throated hummingbirds in Michigan. Amer Midland Nat 104:328–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG, Thomas WW (1977) Diurnal and noctural pollination of Catalpa speciosa (Bignoiaceae). Syst Bot 2:191–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson ME, Bertin RI (1979) Flower-visitors, nectar production and inflorescence size of Asclepias syriaca. Can J Bot 57:1380–1388

    Google Scholar 

  • Wykes GR (1953) The sugar content of nectars. Biochem J 53:294–296

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biological Station, University of Michigan, 49769, Pellston, MI, USA

    A. K. Southwick & E. E. Southwick

Authors
  1. A. K. Southwick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. E. Southwick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Southwick, A.K., Southwick, E.E. Aging effect on nectar production in two clones of Asclepias syriaca . Oecologia 56, 121–125 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378227

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378227

Keywords

Search

Navigation