Skip to main content
Log in

Production efficiency in small mammal populations

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Data from 102 populations of small mammals from 9 ecosystem types in Europe and in North and Central America were analyzed to define the relationship between productivity and respiration in insectivore and rodent populations. Productivity includes addition of new tissue in the form of growth of individual members of the population and new individuals added by reproduction. All data were recalculated to kilojoules per hectare per year. Linear regression was performed on logarithmic transformation of the data to determine the allometric form of the equation relating production to respiration. The relationship for rodents was determined to be: P=0.026 R 1.008 The relationship for shrews was significantly different both in slope and intercept from that for rodents, and was determined to be: P=0.543 R 0.628 The data were also divided according to functional group or trophic level, in addition to taxonomic grouping. Significant differences were found between herbivores and granivores but not among taxonomic divisions other than the Insectivora. Thus, ecological energetics of small mammals is correlated with trophic position but not with taxonomic position.

These equations can be used for prediction of production in rodent and shrew populations where the biomass or respiration is known, thereby aiding the evaluation of trophic relationships in terrestrial communities.

Production efficiency is lowest for insectivores (0.7%), and is higher for granivores (2.3%), omnivores (2.6%), and for herbivores (3.4%). The three parameters of respiration, production and assimilation define the conditions for existence of individual mammal populations. Population growth characteristics and species strategies are correlated with energetics and moderated through diet selection by the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby KR, Vincent MA (1976) Individual and population energy budgets of the water vole. Acta Theriol 21:499–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulak W (1973) Production and energy requirements in a population of the bank vole in a deciduous forest of Ciraeo-Alnetum type. Acta Theriol 18:167–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Baar SL, Fleharty ED (1976) A model of the daily energy budget and energy flow through a population of the white-footed mouse. Acta Theriol 21:179–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Banse K, Mosher S (1980) Adult body mass and annual production/biomass relationships of field population. Ecol Monogr 50:355–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobek B (1971) Influence of population density upon rodent production in a deciduous forest. Ann Zool Fennici 8:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobek B (1973) Net production of small rodents in a deciduous forest. Acta Theriol 18:403–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Case TJ (1978) On the evolution and adaptive significance of postnatal growth rates in the terrestrial vertebrates. Quart Review Biol 53:243–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew RM, Chew AE (1970) Energy relationships of the mammals of a desert shrub (Larrea tridentata) community. Ecol Monographs 40:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Damuth J Population density and body size in mammals. Nature 290:699–700

  • Dixon WJ, Brown MB (1977) BMDP Biomedical computer programs P-series. Unv California Press, Los Angeles 880p

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman JR, Morrison-Scott TCS (1951) Checklist of Palearctic and Indian mammals. British Museum Nat History, London 810p

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann MD (1966) Energetics, terrestrial field studies, and animal productivity. Advances Ecol Res 3:73–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleharty ED, Choate JR (1973) Bioenergetic strategies of the cotton rat Sigmodon hispidus. J Mammal 54:73–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleharty ED, Choate JR (1973) Bioenergetic strategies of the cotton rat Sigmodon hispidus. J Mammal 54:680–692

    Google Scholar 

  • French NR, Grant WE, Grodziński W (1976) Small mammal energetics in grassland ecosystems. Ecol Monographs 46:201–220

    Google Scholar 

  • French NR, Stoddart DM, Bobek B (1975) Patterns of demography in small mammal populations. In: FB Golley, K Petrusewicz, L Ryszkowski (eds) Small mammals Their productivity and population dynamics Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, p 73–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz J (1973) A short characteristics of a population of Proechimys semispinosus (Tomes, 1860) — a rodent species of the tropical rain forest. Bull Acad Pol Sci Cl II 21:413–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley FB (1960) Energy dynamics of a food chain of an old-field community. Ecol Monographs 30:187–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley FB (1968) Secondary productivity in terrestrial communities. Amer Zoologist 8:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley FB (1973) Impact of small mammals on primary production. In: JA Gessaman (ed) Ecological energetics of homeotherms. Utah State Univ Press, Logan, Utah, p 142–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Górecki A (1975) Calorimetry in ecological studies. In: W Grodziński, RZ Klekowski, A Duncan (eds) Methods for ecological energetics. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, p 367

    Google Scholar 

  • Górecki A (1977) Energy flow through the common hamster population. Acta Theriol 22:25–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodziński W (1971) Energy flow through populations of small mammals in the Alaskan taiga forest. Acta Theriol 16:231–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodziński W (1975) Energy flow through a vertebrate population. In: W Grodziński, RZ Klekowski, A Duncan (eds) Methods for ecological bioenergetics. Blackwell Sci Publ, Oxford, p 65–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodziński W, Bobek B, Drozdz A, Górecki A (1970) Energy flow through small rodent populations in a beech forest. In: K Petrusewicz, L Ryszkowski (eds) Energy flow through small mammal populations Polish Sci Publ, Warszawa, p 291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodziński W, French NR (1974) Production and respiration in populations of small mammals. Trans First Inter Theriological Congr 1:206, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodziński W, Górecki A, Janas K, Migula P (1966) Effects of rodents on the primary productivity of alpine meadows in Bieszczady Mountains. Acta Theriol 11:419–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodziński W, Kanamori M, Kitazawa Y (1977) Biological productivity of small rodents. In: Y Kitazawa (ed) Ecosystem analysis of the subalpine coniferous forest of the Shigayama IBP area, Central Japan. JIBP Synthesis 15:149–151

  • Grodziński W, Makomaska M, Tertil R, Weiner, J (1977) Bioenergetics and total impact of vole populations Oikos 29:494–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodziński W, Wunder BA (1975) Ecological energetics of small mammals. In: FB Golley, K Petrusewicz, L Ryszkowski (eds) Small mammals Their productivity and population dynamics. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, p 173–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen A, Østbye E, Skar HJ (1975) Energy budget of a population of the root vole Microtus oeconomus Pall. in a high mountain habitat Hardangervidda. In: FE Wielgolaski (ed) Animals and systems analysis. Ecological Studies 16:170–173, Fennoscandian Tundra Ecosystems Vol 2, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall ER (1981) The mammals of North America. Vol I & II Second edition, Wiley & Sons, NY, p 1181

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L (1971) Estimates of the productivity of small mammals in a South Swedish pruce plantation. Ann Zool Fennici 8:118–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L (1974) Small mammal productivity and consumption in spruce forest and reforestation in South Sweden. Oikos 25:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward GF, Phillipson J (1979) Community structure and functional role of small mammals in ecosystems. In: DM Stoddart (ed) Ecology of small mammals. Chapman and Hall, London, p 135–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys WF (1979) Production and respiration in animal populations. J Anim Ecology 48:427–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski J, Górecki A, Bobek B (1980) Evaluation of computer models in the estimation of energy flow through rodent populations. Bull Acad Pol Sci Cl II 28:497–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman RL (1942) The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23:399–418

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1979) Production and respiration in animal communities. Nature 282:443–445

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab BK (1980) Food habits, energetics, and the population biology of mammals. American Naturalist 116:106–124

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill S, Lawton JH (1970) Annual production and respiration in animal populations. Nature 225:472–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery SD, Whelan JB, Mosby HS (1975) Bioenergetics of a woodlot gray squirrel population. J Wildl Management 39:709–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter J, Wasserman W (1974) Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental design. Richard D Irwin, Inc, Homewood, Illinois, p 842

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP, Connel CE, Davenport LB, (1962) Population energy flow of three primary consumer components of old-field ecosystems. Ecology 43:88–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachinger K (1975) The energy flow through mice populations of Apodemus in central European lowland forests of Fageto-Quercetum type in Bab. Res Project Bab IBP Progress Report II, Veda Publ House, Slovak Acad Sci, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelikán J (1974) Dynamics and energetics of reed swamp population of Arvicola terrestris (Linn). Zoologické Listy 23:321–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernetta JC (1976) Bioenergetics of British shrews in grassland. Acta Theriol 21:481–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrusewicz K, Hansson L (1975) Biological production in small mammal populations. In: FB Golley, K Petrusewicz, L Ryszkowski (eds) Small mammals Their productivity and population dynamics. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, p 153–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson J (1981) Bioenergetic options and phylogeny. In: CR Townsend, P Calow (eds) Physiological ecology An evolutionary approach to resource use. Sinauer Assoc Inc, Sunderland, Massachusetts, p 20–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryszkowski L, Goszczyński J, Truszkowski J (1973) Trophic relationships of the common vole in cultivated fields. Acta Theriol 18:125–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Soholt LF (1973) Consumption of primary production by a population of kangaroo rats (Dipodomys merriami) in the Mojave desert. Ecol Monograph 43:357–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Trojan P (1969) Energy flow through a population of Microtus arvalis (Pall) in an agrocoenosis during a period of mass occurrence. In: K Petrusewicz, L Ryszkowski (eds) Energy flow through small mammal populations. Polish Sci Publ, Warszawa, p 267–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner FB (1970) The ecological efficiency of consumer populations. Ecology 51:741–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner FB, Chew RM (1981) Production by desert animals. In: Goodall DW, Perry RA (eds) Arid land ecosystems: structure, functioning and management. Vol 2. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, p 199–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Western D (1979) Size, life history and ecology in animals. African J Ecology 17:185–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegert GG, Evans FC (1967) Investigations of secondary productivity in grasslands. In: K Petrusewicz (ed) Secondary productivity of terrestrial ecosystems. PWN Warszawa-Krakow, p 499–518

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grodziński, W., French, N.R. Production efficiency in small mammal populations. Oecologia 56, 41–49 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378215

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378215

Keywords

Navigation