Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of fruit and seed set in Pavonia dasypetala (Malvaceae)

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Female reproductive success (fruit and seed set) in Pavonia dasypetala (Malvaceae) was only weakly related to pollinator attentiveness (number of pollinator visits and number of pollen grains deposited on stigmas). This result has implications for field studies of pollination: observational measures of pollinator attentiveness do not necessarily provide an, accurate basis for inferring reproductive success. Further, these results indicate that, although pollination is essential for seed set in this species, reproduction is not limited by pollination. Many flowers that were visited numerous times by hummingbirds and that received pollen in excess of the number of ovules per flower failed to produce fruits. If pollen is limiting, it is pollen quality rather than quantity that is inadequate. Patterns of reproduction in this species were as predicted if resource availability limits seed set (Stephenson 1981): (1) among mature fruits there was an excess of fruits with full seed set (4 or 5 seeds) and (2) probability of fruit, set decreased over the reproductive season. However, resource availability was not the only determinant of seed set in this species: there was also variation among individuals that seems unrelated to either pollen or resource availability. Reproductive success thus appears to be determined by several factors and cannot be described as simply pollen or resource limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertin RI (1982a) Floral biology, hummingbird pollination and fruit production of trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans, Bignoniaceae). Am J Bot 69:122–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin RI (1982b) Paternity and fruit production in trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans). Am Natur 119:694–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierzychudek P (1981) Pollinator limitation of plant reproductive effort. Am Natur 117:838–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock SH (1982) Population structure and reproduction in the neotropical dioecious tree Compsoneura sprucei. Oecologia (Berl) 55:238–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR, Motten AF (1984) The mechanism of competition for pollination between two woodland herbs. Ecology (in press)

  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1981) Allocation of resources of male and female functions in hermaphrodites. Biol J Linn Soc 15:57–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden RW (1972) Pollination biology of Nemophila, menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae) with comments on the evolution of oligolectic bees. Evolution 26:373–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankie GW, Opler PA, Bawa KS (1976) Foraging behavior of solitary bees: implications for outcrossing of a neotropical forest tree species. J Ecol 64:1049–1057

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross RS, Werner PA (1983), Relationships among flowering phenology, insect visitors, and seed-set of individuals: experimental studies on four co-occurring species of goldenrod (Solidago: Compositae). Ecol Monogr 53:95–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel SN (1983) Pollination ecology, plant population structure, and gene flow. In: L Real (ed) Pollination biology, Academic, New York pp 163–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Horovitz A (1978) Is the hermaphrodite flowering plant equisexual? Am J Bot 65:485–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1977) A note on optimal mate selection by plants. Am Natur 111:365–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach GJ (1972) Variation in lucerne seed yields in relation to genotype and intensity of pollination. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 12:420–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1975) Gametophytic selection in Phlox. In: DL Mulcahy (ed) Gametophytic competition in plants and animals, North Holland, Amsterdam pp 207–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Berube D (1972) Phlox and Colias: the efficiency of a pollination system. Evolution 26:242–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Linhart YB, Mitton JB, Bowman DM, Sturgeon KB (1979) Genetic aspects of fertility differentials in ponderosa pine. Genet Res 33:237–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1979) Parental strategies of angiosperms. New Zeal J Bot 17:595–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1980) Sexual strategies in plants. I. An hypothesis of serial adjustment of maternal investment during one reproductive session. New Phytol 86:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • McDade LA (1983) Pollination intensity and seed set in Trichanthera gigantea (Acanthaceae). Biotropica 15:122–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Motten AF (1983) Reproduction of Erythronium umbilicatum (Liliaceae): pollination success and pollinator effectiveness. Oecologia (Berl) 59:351–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Motten AF, Campbell DR, Alexander DE, Miller HL (1981) Pollination effectiveness of specialist and generalist visitors to a North Carolina population of Claytonia virginica. Ecology 62:1278–1287

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL (1974) Adaptive significance of gametic competition. In: HF Linskens (ed) Fertilization in higher plants, North Holland, Amsterdam pp 27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL, Curtis PS, Snow AA (1983) Pollen competition in a natural population of Geranium maculatum. In: CE Jones, RJ Little (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology, van Nostrand Reinhold, New York pp 330–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB (1983) Gametophytic self-incompatibility reexamined. Science 220:1247–1251

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R (1975) Complementary roles of halictids and syrphids in the pollination of Jepsonia heterandra (Saxifragaceae). Evolution 29:370–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Price MV, Waser NW (1982) Experimental studies of pollen carryover: hummingbirds and Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia (Berl) 54:353–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Silander JA (1975) Measuring the relative importance of different pollinators to plants. Nature 255:143–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW (1982) The ecological impact of nectar-robbing bees and pollinating hummingbirds on a tropical shrub. Ecology 63:354–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW (1980) Evolution of floral display in the orchid Brassavola nodosa. Evolution 34:489–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Silander JA, Primack RB (1978) Pollination intensity and seed set in the evening primrose (Oenothera fruticosa). Am Midl Natur 100:213–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow AA (1982) Pollination intensity and potential seed set in Passiflora vitifolia. Oecologia (Berl) 55:231–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG (1980) Fruit set, herbivory, fruit reduction, and the fruiting strategy of Catalpa speciosa (Bignoniaceae). Ecology 61:57–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:253–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Plowright RC (1980) Pollen carryover, nectar rewards, and pollinator behavior with special reference to Diervilla lonicera. Oecologia (Berl) 46:68–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Udovic D (1981) Determinants of fruit set in Yucca whipplei: reproductive expenditure vs. pollinator availability. Oecologia (Berl) 48:389–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson MF, Price PW (1977) The evolution of inflorescence size in Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae). Evolution 31:495–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt R (1981) The reproductive biology of Asclepias tuberosa. II. Factors determining fruit set. New Phytol 88:373–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1980) Reproduction in Polemonium: competition for pollinators. Ecology 61:497–501

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDade, L.A., Davidar, P. Determinants of fruit and seed set in Pavonia dasypetala (Malvaceae). Oecologia 64, 61–67 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377544

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377544

Keywords

Navigation