Oecologia

, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 41–46 | Cite as

pH-preferences and habitat selection in carabid beetles

  • F. Paje
  • D. Mossakowski
Original Papers

Summary

Seven species of carabid beetles were examined in different “pH-Orgeln” for pH-preferences. Five of these species showed significant preferences for specific pH-fields. Presumably, this parameter of distribution found in the laboratory is also effective in the field. We caught the beetles in the field on soil of the same pH-values which they prefered in the laboratory. The pH-measurements taken by previous workers in the field match our results.

The receptors for H-ions are probably located on the antennae, because the preference distribution of Pt. angustatus changed into a uniform distribution after amputation of the distal segments of the antennae. The structure of these receptors could not be identified in electron microscope pictures (REM) among the multitude of different receptors on the antennae.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boer PJ Den (1960) On the Significance of Dispersal Power for Populations of Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Oecologia (Berlin) 4:1–28Google Scholar
  2. Ellenberg H (1958) Bodenreaktion (einschl. Kalkfrage). Handb Pflanzenphysiol 4:638–708Google Scholar
  3. Krogerus R (1939) Zur Ökologie nordischer Moortiere. Verh 7. Intern Kongr Ent Berlin 1938, 2:1213–1231Google Scholar
  4. Krogerus R (1960) Ökologische Studien über nordische Moorarthropoden. Soc Scient Fennica Commentat Biol 21(3):1–238Google Scholar
  5. Lindroth CH (1949) Die Fennoskandischen Carabidae. Eine tiergeographische Studie. 3. Allgemeiner Teil. Göteborgs Kungl Vetensk Vitterh-Samh Handl B 4Google Scholar
  6. Mossakowski D (1966) Ökologische und biometrische Untersuchungen an epigäischen Coleopteren verschiedenartiger Moorund Heidestandorte. Diss (unpubl) Universität KielGoogle Scholar
  7. Mossakowski D (1970) Das Hochmoorökoareal von Agonum ericeti (Panz.) (Coleoptera, Carabidae) und die Frage der Hochmoorbindung. Faun Ökol Mitt 3:378–392Google Scholar
  8. Nettmann HK (1976) Karyotyp-Analysen bei Carabiden (Coleoptera). Mitt dtsch Ent Ges 35:113–117Google Scholar
  9. Peus F (1932) Die Tierwelt der Moore unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der europäischen Hochmoore. In: Bülow Kv (ed) Handbuch der Moorkunde 3Google Scholar
  10. Strenzke K (1951) Grundfragen der Autökologie. Acta Biotheoretica 9:163–184Google Scholar
  11. Thiele HU (1968) Was bindet Laufkäfer an ihre Lebensräume? Naturwissenschaftl Rundschau 21:57–65Google Scholar
  12. Thiele HU (1973) Physiologisch-ökologische Studien an Laufkäfern zur Kausalanalyse ihrer Habitabindung. Verh Ges Ökol Saarbrücken, 39–54Google Scholar
  13. Thiele HU (1977) Carabid Beetles in Their Environment. Zoophysiology and Ecology 10, Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. Tischler W (1949) Grundzüge der terrestrischen Tierökologie. Vieweg, BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  15. Wienert U (1979) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Biotopbindung bei Laufkäfern (Carabidae). Staatsexamensarbeit (unpubl) Universität Bremen Fachbereich BiologieGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Paje
    • 1
  • D. Mossakowski
    • 1
  1. 1.FB 2 (Biologie)Universität BremenBremen 33Germany

Personalised recommendations