Skip to main content
Log in

Lens formation from cornea implanted into amputated hindlimbs of Xenopus laevis larvae requires innervation or proliferating cell populations in the stump

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Roux's archives of developmental biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The capacity of amputated early and late limbs of larval Xenopus laevis to promote lens-forming transformations of corneal implants in the absence of a limb regeneration blastema has been tested by implanting outer cornea fragments from donor larvae at stage 48 (according to Nieuwkoop and Faber 1956), into limb stumps of larvae at stage 52 and 57. Blastema formation has been prevented either by covering the amputation surface with the skin or by reconnecting the amputated part to the limb stump. Results show that stage 52 non-regenerating limbs could promote lens formation from corneal implants not only when innervated but also when denervated. A similar result was observed in stage 57 limbs where blastema formation was prevented by reconnecting the amputated part to the stump. In this case, relevant tissue dedifferentiation was observed in the boundary region between the stump and the autografted part of the limb. However, stage 57 limbs, where blastema formation was prevented by covering the amputation surface with skin, could promote lens formation from the outer cornea only when innervated. In this case, no relevant dedifferentiation of the stump tissues was observed. These results indicate that blastema formation is not a prerequisite for lens-forming transformations of corneal fragments implanted into amputated hindlimbs of larval X. laevis and that lens formation can be promoted by factors delivered by the nerve fibres or produced by populations of undifferentiated or dedifferentiated limb cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert P, Boilly B, Courty J, Barritault D (1987) Stimulation in cell culture of mesenchymal cells of newt limb blastema by EDGF I or II (basic or acid FGF). Cell Differ 21:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Boilly B, Canavaugh KP, Thomas D, Hondermarch H, Bryant SV, Brashaw RA (1991) Acidic fibroblast growth factor is present in regenerating limb blastemas of Axolotls and binds specifically to blastema tissues. Dev Biol 145:302–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosco L, Valle C, Willems D (1993) In vivo and in vitro experimental analysis of lens regeneration in larval Xenopus laevis. Dev Growth Differ 35:257–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannata SM, Bernardini S, Filoni S (1992) Regenerative responses in cultured hindlimb stumps of larval Xenopus laevis. J Exp Zool 262:446–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapron C (1974) Mise en évidence du role, dans la régéneŕation des amphibiens, d'une glycoproteine sécrétée par la cape apicale: Etude cytochimique et autoradiographique en microscopie électronique. J Embryol Exp Morphol 32:133–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn MJ, Izpisua-Belmonte JC, Abud H, Heath JK, Tickle C (1995) Fibroblast growth factors induce additional limb development from the flank of chick embryos. Cell 70:739–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada CM, Park CD, Castilla M, Tassava RA (1993) Monoclonal antibody WE6 identifies an antigen that is up-regulated in the wound epithelium of newts and frogs. In: Fallon JF, Caplan AI (eds) Limb development and regeneration. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 271–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Filoni S, Paglialunga L (1990) Effect of denervation on hindlimb regeneration in Xenopus laevis larvae. Differentiation 43:10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Filoni S, Bosco L, Cioni C (1982) The role of neural retina in lens regeneration from cornea in larval Xenopus laevis. Acta Embryol Morphol Exp 3:15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Filoni S, Bernardini S, Cannata SM (1991a) The influence of denervation on grafted hindlimb regeneration of larval Xenopus laevis. J Exp Zool 260:210–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Filoni S, Albanesi C, Bernardini S, Cannata SM (1991b) Lens formation from the cornea following implantation into hindlimbs of larval Xenopus laevis: the influence of limb innervation and extent of differentiation. J Exp Zool 260:220–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Filoni S, Cannata SM, Bernardini S, La Mesa G (1995) The inhibition of cell proliferation by mitomycin C does not prevent transdifferentiation of outer cornea in larval Xenopus laevis. Differentiation 58:195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman G (1963) Lens regeneration from cornea in Xenopus laevis. J Exp Zool 54:39–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Gospodarowicz D, Mescher AL (1980) Fibroblast growth factors and the control of vertebrate regeneration and repair. Ann NY Acad Sci 339:151–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Mescher AL (1983) Growth factors from nerves and their roles during limb regeneration. In: Fallon IF, Caplan AI (eds) Limb development and regeneration, part A. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 501–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Nace JD, Tassava RA (1995) Examination of fibronectin distribution and its sources in the regenerating newt limb by immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. Dev Dynam 202:153–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J (1956) Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Onda H, Poulin ML, Tassava RA, Chin IM (1991) Characterization of a newt tenascin cDNA and localization of tenascin mRNA during newt limb regeneration by in situ hybridization. Dev Biol 148:219–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulin ML, Patrie KM, Botelho MJ, Tassava RA, Chin IM (1993) Heterogeneity in the expression of fibroblast growth factor receptors during limb regeneration in newts (Notophthalmus viridescens). Development 119:353–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyer RW, Woolfitt RA, Withersty LI (1973) Stimulation of lens regeneration from the newt dorsal iris when implanted into the blastema of the regenerating limb. Dev Biol 32:258–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer M (1965) A theory of the trophic nervous control of amphibia limb regeneration, including a re-evaluation of quantitative nerve requirements. In: Kiortsis V, Trampush AL (eds) Regeneration in animals and related problems. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 20–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer M, Salpeter M (1961) Regeneration in vertebrates: The role of the wound epithelium. In: Zarrow MX (ed) Growth in living systems. Basic Books, New York, pp 277–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack JMW (1995) Growth factor lends a hand. Nature 374:217–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocum DL (1984) The urodele limb regeneration blastema. Determination and organization of the morphogenetic field. Differentiation 27:13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocum DL (1985) Role of the skin in urodele limb regeneration. In. Sicard RE (ed) Regulation of vertebrate limb regeneration. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 32–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassava RA, Johnson-Wint B, Gross J (1986) Regenerate epithelium and skin glands of the adult newt react to the same monoclonal antibody. J Exp Zool 239:229–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor GP, Anderson R, Reginelli AD, Muneoka K (1994) FGF-2 induces regeneration of the chick limb bud. Dev Biol 163:282–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner PR (1973) Lens differentiation from the cornea following lens extirpation or cornea transplantation in Xenopus laevis. J Exp Zool 186:97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada T (1976) The differentiation associated with cell-type conversion in the newt lens regenerating system. In: Muller-Bérat N (ed) Progress in differentiation research. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 355–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada T (1977) Control mechanism in cell-type conversion in newt lens regeneration. Monogr Dev Biol 13:1–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cannata, S.M., Bernardini, S. & Filoni, S. Lens formation from cornea implanted into amputated hindlimbs of Xenopus laevis larvae requires innervation or proliferating cell populations in the stump. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 205, 443–449 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377225

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377225

Key words

Navigation