Abstract
The capacity of amputated early and late limbs of larval Xenopus laevis to promote lens-forming transformations of corneal implants in the absence of a limb regeneration blastema has been tested by implanting outer cornea fragments from donor larvae at stage 48 (according to Nieuwkoop and Faber 1956), into limb stumps of larvae at stage 52 and 57. Blastema formation has been prevented either by covering the amputation surface with the skin or by reconnecting the amputated part to the limb stump. Results show that stage 52 non-regenerating limbs could promote lens formation from corneal implants not only when innervated but also when denervated. A similar result was observed in stage 57 limbs where blastema formation was prevented by reconnecting the amputated part to the stump. In this case, relevant tissue dedifferentiation was observed in the boundary region between the stump and the autografted part of the limb. However, stage 57 limbs, where blastema formation was prevented by covering the amputation surface with skin, could promote lens formation from the outer cornea only when innervated. In this case, no relevant dedifferentiation of the stump tissues was observed. These results indicate that blastema formation is not a prerequisite for lens-forming transformations of corneal fragments implanted into amputated hindlimbs of larval X. laevis and that lens formation can be promoted by factors delivered by the nerve fibres or produced by populations of undifferentiated or dedifferentiated limb cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert P, Boilly B, Courty J, Barritault D (1987) Stimulation in cell culture of mesenchymal cells of newt limb blastema by EDGF I or II (basic or acid FGF). Cell Differ 21:63–68
Boilly B, Canavaugh KP, Thomas D, Hondermarch H, Bryant SV, Brashaw RA (1991) Acidic fibroblast growth factor is present in regenerating limb blastemas of Axolotls and binds specifically to blastema tissues. Dev Biol 145:302–310
Bosco L, Valle C, Willems D (1993) In vivo and in vitro experimental analysis of lens regeneration in larval Xenopus laevis. Dev Growth Differ 35:257–270
Cannata SM, Bernardini S, Filoni S (1992) Regenerative responses in cultured hindlimb stumps of larval Xenopus laevis. J Exp Zool 262:446–453
Chapron C (1974) Mise en évidence du role, dans la régéneŕation des amphibiens, d'une glycoproteine sécrétée par la cape apicale: Etude cytochimique et autoradiographique en microscopie électronique. J Embryol Exp Morphol 32:133–145
Cohn MJ, Izpisua-Belmonte JC, Abud H, Heath JK, Tickle C (1995) Fibroblast growth factors induce additional limb development from the flank of chick embryos. Cell 70:739–746
Estrada CM, Park CD, Castilla M, Tassava RA (1993) Monoclonal antibody WE6 identifies an antigen that is up-regulated in the wound epithelium of newts and frogs. In: Fallon JF, Caplan AI (eds) Limb development and regeneration. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 271–282
Filoni S, Paglialunga L (1990) Effect of denervation on hindlimb regeneration in Xenopus laevis larvae. Differentiation 43:10–19
Filoni S, Bosco L, Cioni C (1982) The role of neural retina in lens regeneration from cornea in larval Xenopus laevis. Acta Embryol Morphol Exp 3:15–28
Filoni S, Bernardini S, Cannata SM (1991a) The influence of denervation on grafted hindlimb regeneration of larval Xenopus laevis. J Exp Zool 260:210–219
Filoni S, Albanesi C, Bernardini S, Cannata SM (1991b) Lens formation from the cornea following implantation into hindlimbs of larval Xenopus laevis: the influence of limb innervation and extent of differentiation. J Exp Zool 260:220–228
Filoni S, Cannata SM, Bernardini S, La Mesa G (1995) The inhibition of cell proliferation by mitomycin C does not prevent transdifferentiation of outer cornea in larval Xenopus laevis. Differentiation 58:195–203
Freeman G (1963) Lens regeneration from cornea in Xenopus laevis. J Exp Zool 54:39–66
Gospodarowicz D, Mescher AL (1980) Fibroblast growth factors and the control of vertebrate regeneration and repair. Ann NY Acad Sci 339:151–172
Mescher AL (1983) Growth factors from nerves and their roles during limb regeneration. In: Fallon IF, Caplan AI (eds) Limb development and regeneration, part A. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 501–512
Nace JD, Tassava RA (1995) Examination of fibronectin distribution and its sources in the regenerating newt limb by immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. Dev Dynam 202:153–164
Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J (1956) Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam
Onda H, Poulin ML, Tassava RA, Chin IM (1991) Characterization of a newt tenascin cDNA and localization of tenascin mRNA during newt limb regeneration by in situ hybridization. Dev Biol 148:219–232
Poulin ML, Patrie KM, Botelho MJ, Tassava RA, Chin IM (1993) Heterogeneity in the expression of fibroblast growth factor receptors during limb regeneration in newts (Notophthalmus viridescens). Development 119:353–361
Reyer RW, Woolfitt RA, Withersty LI (1973) Stimulation of lens regeneration from the newt dorsal iris when implanted into the blastema of the regenerating limb. Dev Biol 32:258–281
Singer M (1965) A theory of the trophic nervous control of amphibia limb regeneration, including a re-evaluation of quantitative nerve requirements. In: Kiortsis V, Trampush AL (eds) Regeneration in animals and related problems. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 20–32
Singer M, Salpeter M (1961) Regeneration in vertebrates: The role of the wound epithelium. In: Zarrow MX (ed) Growth in living systems. Basic Books, New York, pp 277–311
Slack JMW (1995) Growth factor lends a hand. Nature 374:217–218
Stocum DL (1984) The urodele limb regeneration blastema. Determination and organization of the morphogenetic field. Differentiation 27:13–28
Stocum DL (1985) Role of the skin in urodele limb regeneration. In. Sicard RE (ed) Regulation of vertebrate limb regeneration. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 32–53
Tassava RA, Johnson-Wint B, Gross J (1986) Regenerate epithelium and skin glands of the adult newt react to the same monoclonal antibody. J Exp Zool 239:229–240
Taylor GP, Anderson R, Reginelli AD, Muneoka K (1994) FGF-2 induces regeneration of the chick limb bud. Dev Biol 163:282–284
Waggoner PR (1973) Lens differentiation from the cornea following lens extirpation or cornea transplantation in Xenopus laevis. J Exp Zool 186:97–110
Yamada T (1976) The differentiation associated with cell-type conversion in the newt lens regenerating system. In: Muller-Bérat N (ed) Progress in differentiation research. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 355–360
Yamada T (1977) Control mechanism in cell-type conversion in newt lens regeneration. Monogr Dev Biol 13:1–24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cannata, S.M., Bernardini, S. & Filoni, S. Lens formation from cornea implanted into amputated hindlimbs of Xenopus laevis larvae requires innervation or proliferating cell populations in the stump. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 205, 443–449 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377225
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377225