Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of marking and capture on recapture frequencies of butterflies

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

As a preliminary to a population study using markrelease-recapture techniques, specimens of the Satyrid buttfly Melanargia galathea (L.) were subjected to a number of marking and capture techniques. Although the adults are thought to display both aposematic and cryptic coloration, the use of marks of different sizes and colours had no significant effect on recapture frequencies. However, repeated disturbance due to capture was found to significantly reduce recapture frequency. The influence of the different techniques on recapture frequencies could not be detected reliably by excessively low recapture rates, or by comparisons to Poisson distributions. It is suggested that these comparisons are of limited value as measures of the suitability of a marking or handling scheme. Subsequent work showed that capture affected recapture rates of several other species. Moreover, these effects could not be readily predicted from knowledge of the biology of these species. The implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop JA, Sheppard PM (1973) An evaluation of two capture-recapture models using the technique of computer stimulation. In: MS Bartlett, RW Hiorns (eds), The mathematical theory of the dynamics of biological populations. Academic Press, N.Y. and London, p 235–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Blower JG, Cook LM, Bishop JA (1981) Estimating the size of animal populations. George Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown IL, Ehrlich PR (1980) Population biology of the checkerspot butterfly Euphydryas chalcedona. Structure of the Jasper Ridge colony. Oecologia (Berl) 47:239–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook LM, Thomason EW, Young AM (1976) Population structure, dynamics and dispersal of the tropical butterfly Heliconius charitonius. Anim Ecol 45:851–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig CC (1953) On the utilisation of marked specimens in estimating populations of flying insects. Biometrika 40:170–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson RM, Stephenson JW, Lofty JR (1958) A quantitative study of a population of wheat bulb fly, Leptohylemyia coarctata (Fall.), in the field. Bull ent Res 49:95–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Douwes P (1970) Size of, gain to and loss from a population of adult Heodes virgaureae L. Ent Scand 1:263–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowdeswell WH, Fisher RA, Ford EB (1940) The quantitative study of populations in the Lepidoptera. 1. Polyommatus icarus Rott. Ann Eugen Lond 10:123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Gilbert LE (1973) Population structure and dynamics of the tropical butterfly, Heliconius ethilla. Biotropica 5:69–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA, Ford EB (1947) The spread of a gene in natural conditions in a colony of the moth Panaxia dominula L. Heredity 1:143–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley PHT (1954) Back garden ornithology. Bird Study 1:18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson CHN (1948) The analysis of a tsetse-fly population. III. Ann Eugen, Lond 14:91–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly GM (1965) Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration — stochastic model. Biometrika 55:225–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln FC (1930) Calculating waterfowl abundance on the basis of banding returns. U.S.D.A. Circ 118:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, Parr MJ (1968) A new method for estimating population size, survivorship, and birth rate from capture-recapture data. Trans Soc Brit Ent 18:81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore NW (1975) Butterfly transects in a linear habitat 1964–1973. Ent Gaz 26:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing changes in abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12:115–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E, Elias DO, Skelton MJ, Thomas JA (1975) A method of assessing the abundance of butterflies in Monks Wood National Nature Reserve in 1973. Ent Gaz 26:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1973) An examination of some statistical tests used in the analysis of mark-recapture data. Oecologia (Berl.) 12:35–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (1965) A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika 52:249–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp MA, Parks DR (1973) Habitat selection and population structure in Plebejus saepiolus Boisduval (Lycaenidae). J Lep Soc 27:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC, Wedlake P (1981) Capture does affect probability of recapture in a bufferfly species. Ecol Ent 6:215–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeleton MJ, Heath J (1975) Insect distribution maps scheme, Lepidoptera Rhopalocera, Provisional distribution maps. Biological Records Centre, Monks Wood

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (1978) Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morton, A.C. The effects of marking and capture on recapture frequencies of butterflies. Oecologia 53, 105–110 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377143

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377143

Keywords

Navigation