Skip to main content
Log in

Energy cost and efficiency of riding aerodynamic bicycles

  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Traction resistance (R t) was determined by towing two cyclists in fully dropped posture on bicycles with an aerodynamic frame with lenticular wheels (AL), an aerodynamic frame with traditional wheels (AT), or a traditional frame with lenticular wheels (TL) in calm air on a flat wooden track at constant speed (8.6–14.6 m·s−1). Under all experimental conditions, R t increased linearly with the square of air velocity (νa 2); r 2 equal to greater than 0.89. The constant k = ΔR t/Δνa 2 was about 15% lower for AL and AT (0.157 and 0.155 N·2·m−2) than for TL bicycles (0.184 N·2·−2). These data show firstly, that in terms of mechanical energy savings, the role of lenticular wheels is negligible and, secondly, that for TL bicycles, the value of k was essentially equal to that found by others for bicycles with a traditional frame and traditional wheels (TT). The energy cost of cycling per unit distance (C c, J·m−1) was also measured for AT and TT bicycles from the ratio of the O2 consumption above resting to speed, in the speed range from 4.7 to 11.1 m·s−1. The C c also increased linearly with νa 2, as described by: C c = 30.8 + 0.558 νa 2 and C c = 29.6 + 0.606 νa 2 for AT and TT bicycles. Thus from our study it would seem that AT bicycles are only about 5% more economical than TT at 12.5 m·s the economy tending to increase slightly with the speed. Assuming a rolling coefficient equal to that observed by others in similar conditions, the mechanical efficiency was about 10% lower for aerodynamic than for conventional bicycles, amounting to about 22% and 25% at a speed of 12.5 m·s−1. From these data it was possible to calculate that the performance improvement when riding aerodynamic bicycles, all other things being equal, ought to be about 3%. This compares favourably with the increase of about 4% observed in world record speeds (over distances from 1 to 20 km) after the adoption of the new bicycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • di Prampero PE (1986) The energy cost of human locomotion on land and water. Int J Sports Med 7:55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • di Prampero PE, Cortili G, Mognoni P, Saibene F (1979) Equation of motion of a cyclist. J Appl Physiol 47:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Dubois EF (1915) The measurement of the surface area of man. Arch Intern Med 15:868–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Geigy Scientific Tables (1982) Introduction to statstics, statistical tables, mathematical formulae. In: Lentner C (ed) Ciba-Geigy, Basle, pp 214–215

  • Kyle C (1979) Reduction of wind resistance and power output of racing cyclists and runners travelling in groups. Ergonomics 22:387–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyle C (1986) Mechanical factors affecting the speed of a cycle. In: Burke ER (ed) Science of cycling. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill., pp 133–135

    Google Scholar 

  • McCole SD, Claney K, Conte J-C, Anderson R, Hagberg J (1990) Energy expenditure during bicycling. J Appl Physiol 68:748–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh LGCE (1973) The influence of wind resistance in running and walking and the mechanical efficiency of work against horizontal or vertical forces. J Physiol (Lond) 213:255–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh LGCE (1974) The relation of oxygen intake and speed in competition cycling and comparative observations on the bicycle ergometer. J Physiol (Lond) 241:795–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant AJ (1988) Optimum cycle frequencies in human movement. J Physiol (Lond) 241:49P

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabury JJ, Adams WC, Ramey MR (1977) Influence of pedalling rate and power output on energy expenditure during bicycle ergometry. Ergonomics 20:491–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain DP, Richard Coast J, Clifford PS, Milliken MC, Stray-Gundersen J (1987) Influence of body size on oxygen consumption during bicycling. J Appl Physiol 62:668–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Welbergen E, Clijsen LPVM (1990) The influence of body position on maximal performance in cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol 61:138–142

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Capelli, C., Rosa, G., Butti, F. et al. Energy cost and efficiency of riding aerodynamic bicycles. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol. 67, 144–149 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376658

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376658

Key words

Navigation