Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro comparison of water-holding capacity of the superficial and deeper layers of the stratum corneum

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We measured the electrical conductance at 3.5 MHz of a sheet of normal stratum corneum (SC) mounted with either the upper surface or the lower surface downward in simulated in vivo conditions. In this way, we assessed the water-binding capacity of the upper and lower portions of the horny layer. Measurements were made with the SC model in environments of various relative humidities. Between 30% and 90% relative humidity, the conductance of the upper surface was always significantly higher than that of the lower surface. In contrast no significant difference was observed in transepidermal water loss (TEWL) with the SC sheet placed upwards or downwards. After exposure to lipid extraction with acetone/ether, a significant decrease in conductance and increase in TEWL occurred, particularly in the upper surface. The amount of extractable amino acids was much higher from the middle layer than from the outer layers of the SC, and was lowest from the deepest part of SC. These results, indicating a lower efficiency of the lower surface of the SC for water-binding than the desquamating upper surface, suggest that newly formed immature SC does not have the water-holding capacity of the mid portion of the SC, which is probably the layer with the greatest water holding capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker H, Kligman M (1967) Measurement of transepidermal water loss by electrical hygrometry. Arch Dermatol 96:441–452

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blank IH (1952) Factors which influence the water content of the stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 18:433–450

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elias PM, Menon GK, Grayson S, Brown B (1988) Membrane structural alteration in murine stratum corneum: relationship to the localization of polar lipids and phospholipases. J Invest Dermatol 91:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Horii I, Kawasaki K, Koyama J, Nakayama Y, Nakajima K, Okazaki K, Seiji M (1983) Histidine-rich protein as a possible origin of free amino acids of stratum corneum. J Dermatol 10:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  5. Horii I, Nakayama Y, Obata M, Tagami H (1989) Stratum corneum hydration and amino acid content in xerotic skin. Br J Dermatol 121:587–592

    Google Scholar 

  6. Imokawa G, Hattori M (1985) A possible function of structural lipids in the water-holding properties of the stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 84:282–284

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kligman AM (1964) The biology of the stratum corneum. In: Montagna W, Lobitz WC (eds) The epidermis. Academic Press, New York, pp 387–433

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kligman AM, Christophers E (1963) Preparation of isolated sheets of human stratum corneum. Arch Dermatol 88:702–795

    Google Scholar 

  9. Middleton JD (1968) The mechanism of water binding in stratum corneum. Br J Dermatol 80:437–450

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nilsson GE (1977) Measurement of water assessment of the stratum corneum. Med Biol 15:209–219

    Google Scholar 

  11. Obata M, Tagami H (1989) Electrical determination of water content and concentration profile in a simulation model of in vivo stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 95:854–859

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scott IR, Harding CR (1982) Histidine-rich protein of the keratohyalin granules: source of the free amino acids, urocanic acid and pyrrolidone carboxylic acid in the stratum corneum. Biochim Biophys Acta 719:110–117

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scott IR, Harding CR (1986) Filaggrin breakdown to water binding compounds during development of the rat stratum corneum is controlled by the water activity of the environment. Dev Biol 115:84–92

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tagami H (1989) Impedance measurement for evaluation of the hydration state of the skin surface. In: Leveque J-L (ed) Cutaneous investigation in health and disease. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 79–111

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tagami H, Yoshikuni K (1985) Interrelationship between water barrier and reservoir function of pathologic stratum corneum. Arch Dermatol 121:642–645

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tagami H, Ohi M, Iwatsuki K, Kanamaru Y, Yamada M, Ichijo B (1980) Evaluation of the skin hydration in vivo by electrical measurement. J Invest Dermatol 75:500–507

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tagami H, Kanamaru Y, Inoue K, Suehisa S, Inoue F, Iwatsuki K, Yoshikuni Y, Yamada M (1984) Water sorption-desorption test of the skin in vitro for functional assessment of the stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 78:425–428

    Google Scholar 

  18. Volk VD, Maibach HI (1990) A functional study of the skin barrier to evaporative water loss by means of repeated cellophane-tape stripping. Clin Exp Dermatol 15:180–182

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williams ML (1983) The dynamics of desquamation. Am J Dermatol 24:131–140

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hashimoto-Kumasaka, K., Horii, I. & Tagami, H. In vitro comparison of water-holding capacity of the superficial and deeper layers of the stratum corneum. Arch Dermatol Res 283, 342–346 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376625

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376625

Key words

Navigation