Skip to main content
Log in

The risk of postoperative urinary incontinence after surgical treatment of genital prolapse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Full urodynamic assessment, including urethral profiles at rest and under stress, was made before and after surgery for severe urogenital prolapse in 40 continent women. Profilometry was also recorded after reduction of the prolapse by a vaginal pessary. The aim of this study was to try to determine criteria to prevent postoperative incontinence. After surgery, 6 patients (15%) became stress incontinent. The operation tends to diminish urethral obstruction (diminution of the residual volume) and negatively affects urodynamic urethral parameters (diminution of the residual continence area). The pessary test was not predictive of postoperative incontinence. Preoperative transmission ratio <100% and/or maximum urethral closure pressure <35 cmH2O are proposed as predisposing factors for postoperative iatrogenic incontinence. Therapeutic implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Versi E, Cardozo L, Brincat M, Cooper D, Mongomery J, Studd J. Correlation of urethral physiology and skin collagen in postmenopausal women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95:147–152

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rud T. Urethral pressure profile in continent women from childhood to old age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1980;59:331–335

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krige CF. The repair of genital prolapse combined with vaginal hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaec Br Emp 1962;79:570–576

    Google Scholar 

  4. Read CD. Stress incontinence with special reference to failure of cure following vaginal operative procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1950;59:1260–1267

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer W, Lamm D. Urologische Komplikation beim Genitalprolaps der Frau. Z Urol Nephrol 1978;71:857–864

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harris TA, Bent AE. Genital prolapse with and without urinary incontinence. J Reprod Med 1990;8:792–798

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walter S, Olesen PK. Urinary incontinence and genital prolapse in the female: clinical urodynamic and radiological examinations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982;89:393–401

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richardson DA, Bent AE, Ostergard DR. The effect of uterovaginal prolapse on urethrovesical pressure dynamics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;146:901–905

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ridley JH. Evaluation of the colpocleisis operation: a report of fifty-eight cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972;113:114–119

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldmann T, Ovadia T, Feldberg D. The Neugebauer-Le Fort Operation: a review of 118 partial colpocleises. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1981;12:31–5

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stanton SL, Norton C, Cardozo L. Clinical and urodynamic effects of anterior colporrhaphy and vaginal hysterectomy for prolapse with and without incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982;89:459–463

    Google Scholar 

  12. Enhorning GE. Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intraurethral pressure. A study of urethral closure in normal and stress-incontinent women. Acta Clin Scand 1961; Suppl. 276

  13. Asmussen M. Static and dynamic pressures of the lower urinary tract as measured by simultaneous urethral cystometry, In: Ostergard D. R. ed. Gynecologic urology and urodynamics. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1985;133–166

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rai RS, Versi E. Urethral pressure profilometry. Int Urogynecol J 1991;2:222–227

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hilton P, Stanton SL. Clinical and urodynamic evaluation of the polypropylene (Marlex) sling for genuine stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 1983;2:145–153

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weil A, Reyes H, Bischof P, Rottenberg R, Krauer F. Modifications of the urethral rest and stress profiles after different types of surgery for urinary stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;91:46–55

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rottenberg R, Weil A, Brioschi PA, Krauer F. Urodynamic and clinical assessment of the Lyodura sling operation for urinary stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:829–834

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bhatia NN, Bergman A, Gunning JE. Urodynamic effects of a vaginal pessary in women with stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;147:876–84.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bhatia NN, Bergman A. Urodynamic appraisal of the Bonney test in women with stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1983;65:696–699

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bhatia NN, Bergman A. Pessary test in women with urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1985;65:220–226

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bergman A, Bhatia NN. Pessary test: simple prognostic test in women with stress incontinence. Urology 1985;24:109–110

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stanton SL, Ritchie D. Urilos: the practical detection of urine loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 128:461–463

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reyes H, Weil A. Reproducibility of simultaneous urethrocystometry measured with electronic microtransducers. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1983;15:129–140

    Google Scholar 

  24. Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Int Urogynecol J 1990;1:45–58

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ingelman-Sundberg A. Urinary incontinence in women excluding fistulas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1951;31:266–291

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schüssler B, Hesse U, Lentsch P, Anthuben C. Artefacts in urethrometry caused by marked genital prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 1987;6:154–155

    Google Scholar 

  27. Walters MD. Mechanism of continence and voiding, with International Continence Society classification of dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1989;16:773–785

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weil A, Reyes H, Bischof P, Rottenberg R, Krauer F. Clinical relevance of urethral stress profile using microtransducers after surgery for stress incontinence in females. Urol Int 1983;38:363–367

    Google Scholar 

  29. Henriksson L, Ulmsten U. A urodynamic evaluation of the effects of abdominal urethrocystopexy and vaginal sling urethroplasty. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978;131:77–82

    Google Scholar 

  30. de Gregorio G, Hillemans HG. Urethral closure pressure in women with prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 1990;1:143–145

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bergman A, Konnings P, Ballard A. Predicting postoperative urinary incontinence development in women undergoing operation for genitourinary prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:1171–1175

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weil, A., Gianoni, A., Rottenberg, R.D. et al. The risk of postoperative urinary incontinence after surgical treatment of genital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 4, 74–79 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376416

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376416

Keywords

Navigation