Advertisement

Roux's archives of developmental biology

, Volume 196, Issue 4, pp 222–230 | Cite as

Lineage analysis of transplanted individual cells in embryos of Drosophila melanogaster

IV. Commitment and proliferative capabilities of mesodermal cells
  • Justinus Beer
  • Gerhard M. Technau
  • Jose A. Campos -Ortega
Article

Summary

We describe the results of cell transplantation experiments performed to investigate mesodermal lineages in Drosophila melanogaster, particularly the lineages of the somatic muscles, the visceral muscles and the fat body. Cells to be transplanted were labelled by injecting a mixture of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and fluorescein-dextran (FITC) in wild-type embryos at the syncytial blastoderm stage. For transplantation cells were removed from the ventral furrow, 8–12 min after the start of gastrulation, and individually transplanted into homotopic or heterotopic locations of unlabelled wild-type hosts of the same age. HRP labelling in the resulting cell clones was demonstrated histochemically in the fully developed embryo; histotypes could be distinguished without ambiguity. Mesodermal cells were already found to be committed to mesodermal fates at the time of transplantation. They developed only into mesodermal derivatives and did not integrate in non-mesodermal organs upon heterotopical transplantation. No evidence was found for commitment to any particular mesodermal organ at the time of transplantation. The majority of somatic muscle clones contributed cells to only one segment. However, clones were not infrequently distributed through two or even three segments. Clones of fat body cells were generally restricted to a small region. However, cells of clones of visceral musculature were widely distributed. With respect to the proliferative abilities of transplanted cells the clones were difficult to interpret due to the syncytial character of the somatic musculature and the fact that the organization of the other organs is poorly understood. Evidence from histological observations of developing normal embryos indicates only three mitoses for mesodermal cells. Clones larger than seven cells were not found when embryos were fixed previous to germ-band shortening; larger clones were found in the fat body and visceral musculature after fixing the embryos at the end of organogenesis. Quantitative considerations suggest that a few mesodermal cells might perform more than three mitoses.

Key words

Mesodermal cell lineages Cell transplantations Embryogenesis Drosophila 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bodmer R, Jan YN (1987) Morphological differentiation of the embryonic peripheral neuron in Drosophila. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 196:69–77Google Scholar
  2. Campos-Ortega JA, Hartenstein V (1985) The embyonic development of Drosophila melanogaster. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York TokyoGoogle Scholar
  3. Fraser SE, Bryant PJ (1985) Patterns of dye coupling in the imaginal wing disk of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature (Lond) 317:533–536Google Scholar
  4. Gimlich RL, Braun J (1985) Improved fluorescent compounds for tracing cell lineage. Dev Biol 109:509–514Google Scholar
  5. Hartenstein V, Campos-Ortega JA (1985) Fate-mapping in wildtype Drosophila melanogaster. I. The spatio-temporal pattern of embryonic cell divisions. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 194:181–195Google Scholar
  6. Illmensee K (1978) Drosophila chimeras and the problem of determination. In: Gehring WJ (ed.) Genetic mosaics and cell differentiation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 51–69Google Scholar
  7. Kauffman SA (1980) Heterotopic transplantation in the syncytial blastoderm of Drosophila: Evidence for anterior and posterior commitments. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 189:135–145Google Scholar
  8. Lawrence PA (1982) Cell lineage of the thoracic muscles in Drosophila. Cell 29:493–503Google Scholar
  9. Lawrence PA, Brower DL (1982) Myoblasts from Drosophila wing disks can contribute to developing muscles throughout the fly. Nature (Lond) 295:55–57Google Scholar
  10. Lawrence PA, Johnston P (1982) Cell lineage of the Drosophila abdomen: the epidermis, oenocytes and ventral muscles. J Embryol Exp Morphol 72:197–208Google Scholar
  11. Lawrence PA, Johnston P (1986) Observations on cell lineage of internal organs of Drosophila. J Embryol Exp Morphol 91:251–266Google Scholar
  12. Lo CW, Gilula NB (1979) Gap junctional communication in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Cell 18:399–409Google Scholar
  13. Poulson DF (1950) Histogenesis, Organogenesis and differentiation in the embryo of Drosophila melanogaster Meigen. In: Demerec M (ed). The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Wiley, New York, pp 168–274Google Scholar
  14. Sauer E (1954) Keimblätterbildung und Differenzierungsleistungen in isolierten Eiteilen der Honigbiene. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 147:302–354Google Scholar
  15. Simcox AA, Sang JH (1983) When does determination occur in Drosophila embryos? Dev Biol 97:212–221Google Scholar
  16. Sonnenblick BP (1950) The early embryology of Drosophila melanogaster. In: Demerec M (ed.). The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Wiley, New York, pp 62–167Google Scholar
  17. Technau GM (1986) Lineage analysis of transplanted individual cells in embryos of Drosophila melanogaster. I. The method. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 195:389–398Google Scholar
  18. Technau GM, Campos-Ortega JA (1985) Fate-mapping in wild type Drosophila melanogaster. II. Injections of horseradish peroxidase in cells of the early gastrula stage. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 194:196–212Google Scholar
  19. Technau GM, Campos-Ortega JA (1986a) Lineage analysis of transplanted individual cells in embryos of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Commitment and proliferative capabilities of neural and epidermal progenitors. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 195:445–454Google Scholar
  20. Technau GM, Campos-Ortega JA (1986b) Lineage analysis of transplanted individual cells in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Commitment and proliferative capabilities of pole cells and midgut progenitors. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 195:489–498Google Scholar
  21. Weir MP, Lo CW (1984) Gap-junctional communication compartments in the Drosophila wing imaginal disk. Dev Biol 102:130–146Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justinus Beer
    • 1
  • Gerhard M. Technau
    • 1
  • Jose A. Campos -Ortega
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut for EntwicklungsphysiologieUniversität zu KölnKöln 41Germany

Personalised recommendations