Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Controlling acid deposition: A general equilibrium assessment

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluate the impact of the SO2 provisions in the 1990 Clean Air Act. A computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the United States is used to evaluate the implications of this law for a number of economic sectors. We find that the largest negative impact falls on the coal industry. Output in the refining sector also decreases, but agricultural production increases as consumers shift spending into food and wood based products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballard, C. L., Fullerton, D., Shoven, J. B., and Whalley, J. (1985a), A General Equilibrium Model for Tax Policy Evaluation, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, C. L., Shoven, J. and Whalley, J. (1985b), ‘General equilibrium computations of the marginal welfare costs of taxes in the United States’, American Economic Review 75(1), 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, L. (1991), ‘General equilibrium effects of environmental policy: a CGE-modeling approach’, Environmental and Resource Economics 1(1), 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgess, A. M. and Goulder, L. H. (1984), ‘Decomposing the impact of higher energy prices on long-term growth’, in Applied General Equilibrium Analysis, H. E. Scarf and J. B. Shoven (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. (1988), ‘The direct and indirect effects of tax reform on agriculture’, Technical Bulletin Number 1743, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Krutilla, K. (1988), ‘The politics and consequences of protectionism: A case study in the North American lumber market’, Journal of Policy Modeling, Winter 1988, 601–609.

  • Boyd, R. and Krutilla, K. (1990/91), ‘The impact of the free trade agreement on the U.S. forestry sector: a general equilibrium analysis’, Journal of Business Administration 19(2), 120–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBO (1986), Curbing Acid Rain: Cost, Budget, and Coal-Market Effects, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazilla, M. and Kopp, R. (1990), ‘Social cost of environmental quality regulations: a general equilibrium analysis’, Journal of Political Economy 98, 853–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, E. O. and Dillon, J. L. (1961), Agricultural Production Functions, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T. W. and Tsigas, M. (1987), ‘Tax policy and U.S. agriculture: a general equilibrium analysis’, Staff paper 87-2, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Layfayette, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, E. A. and Jorgenson, D. W. (1974), ‘Energy policy and economic growth’, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 5, 461–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • JCT (1987), Description of H. R. 2497 (Sulfur and nitrogen emissions tax act of 1987). Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Congress, Washington D.C.

  • Krupnick, A., Bohi, D., and Burtraw, D. (1990), ‘Emissions trading and the electric utility industry’, Resources, Summer 1990, 10–13.

  • Krupnick, A. and Portney, P. (1991), ‘Controlling urban pollution: a benefit cost assessment’, Science 252, 522–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A. S. (1976), ‘ETA: a model for energy technology assessment’, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 7, 379–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen, L. (1985), ‘Computational experience in solving equilibrium models by a sequence of linear complementary problems’, Operations Research 33, 1225–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAPAP (1990), National Acid Precipitation Program Report to the President and Congress. Washington D.C.

  • Portney, P. (1990), ‘Economics and the clean air act’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 4(4), 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uri, N.D. (1984), ‘The impact of technical change on the aggregate production function’, Applied Economics 16, 555–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. Survey of Current Business, Washington D.C., May 1984, July 1985.

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Various unpublished spreadsheets, 1986.

  • U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Service. Costs and Indices for Domestic Oil and Gas Field Equipment and Production Operations, 1985. DOE/EIA-0185(85). Washington D.C., 1986a.

  • U.S. Department of Energy, Petroleum Supply Annual, 1985, 2 vol. DOE/EIA-0340(85). Washington D.C., 1986b.

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Farm Sector Review, 1985. ECIFS 5-4. Washington D.C. 1985.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyd, R., Krutilla, K. Controlling acid deposition: A general equilibrium assessment. Environ Resource Econ 2, 307–322 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376202

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376202

Key words

Navigation