Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of dilution and phase separation on the anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewaters

  • Originals
  • Published:
Bioprocess Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high organic content of Olive Mill Wastewaters (OMW) causes some difficulties in maintaining the anaerobic process efficiency at high level. The two phase anaerobic system was used to treat olive mill wastewaters, diluted with tap water. Phase separation was accomplished through control of the hydraulic retention time and initial COD removal in two reactors operated in series. The effect of substrate concentration and phase separation on removal efficiency has been investigated. Experimental results indicated that yield of 0.322 to 0.335 litre biogas/g COD removal were obtained with two phase anaerobic treatment and space loading rate of 2.3 and 2.4 gCOD/l.day. The maximum methane production rate near to the theoretical value and corresponded to 360 ml of CH4 for 1g COD removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

OMW:

Olive Mill Wastewaters

VFA:

Volatile Fatty Acid

COD:

Chemical Oxygen Demand

HRT:

High Retention Time

TKN:

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

References

  1. Boari, G.; Brunetti, A.; Passino, R.; Rozzi, A.: Anaerobic digestion of olive oil mill wastewaters. Agricultural. Wastes 10 (1984) 161–175

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tsonis, S. P.; Grigoropoulos, S. G.: High rate anaerobic treatment of olive oil mill wastewater. Proceedings of fifth Intern. Symp. on Anaerobic Digestion, Bologna. In: Hall, E. R.; Hobson, P. N. (Eds.), pp. 115–124 (1988)

  3. Balice, V.; Boari, G.; Cera, O.; Abbaticchio, P.: Indagine analitica sulle acque di vegetazione. Nota 1. Inquinamento 7 (1982) 49–53

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flemming, H. P.; Etchells, J. C.: Occurrence of an inhitor of lactic acid bacteria in green olives. Appl. Microbiol. 15 (1967) 1187–1192

    Google Scholar 

  5. Saiz, J. C.; Gomez, A. G.: Vegetation water treatment by aerobic fermentation with fungi. Simposio International sobre valorizacion de los subproductos del olivar: alpechin y orujo. 5-6-7 Marzo, sevilla. Espana, pp. 48 (1986)

  6. Balice, V.; Carriere, C.; Cera, O.; Rindone, B.: The fate of tannius-like compounds from olive mill effluent in biological treatment. Proceedings of fifth Intern. Symp. on Anaerobic Digestion. Bologna. In: Hall, E. R.; Hobson, P. N. (Eds.) pp. 275–279 (1988).

  7. Hamdi, M.; Khadir, A.; Garcia J. L.: The use of Aspergillus niger for the bioconversion of olive mill wastewater. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 34 (1991) 828–831

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fiestas Ros de Ursinos, J. A.: Differentes utilisations des margines. In: Proc. of Séminaire International sur la valorisation des sous-produits de l'olivier. FAO-PNUD. Tunisie pp 93–110 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fiestas Ros de Ursinos, J. A.; Navarro Gamero, R.; Leon Gabello, R.; Garcia Buendia, A. J.; Mastrojuan Saez de Jauragui, G. M.: Depuracion anaerobia del alpechin como fuenta de energia Grasas Aceites, 33 (1982) 265–270

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pohland, F. G.; Ghosh, S.: Anaerobic stabilization of organic wastes, two-phase concept. Envir. Litt. 1 (1971) 255–266

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fan, L. T.; Erickson, L. E.; Balles, J. C., Shah, P. S.: Analysis and optimisation of two-stage digestion J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed., 45 (4) (1973) 591–610

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ghosh, S.; Conrad, J. R.; Klass, K. L.: Anaerobic acidogenesis of wastewater sludge. J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed., 47 (1) (1975) 30–44

    Google Scholar 

  13. Massey, M. L.; Pohland, F. G.: Phase separation of anaerobic stabilisation by kinetic controls. J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed., 50 (9) (1978) 2204–2222

    Google Scholar 

  14. Balch, W. E.; Fox, G. E.; Magrum, L. J.; Woese, L. R.; Wolfe, R. S.: Methanogens: Reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol. Rev., 43 (1979) 260–296

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ross Knechtel, J.: A more economical method for the determination of oxygen demand. Water Pollution Control, May/ June, (1978) 24–28

  16. APHA: Standard methods of the examination of water and wastewater, 15th Edition. American Public Health Association, American Water Work Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC. (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fedorak, P. M.; Hrudey, S. E.: The effects of phenol and some alkyl phenolics on batch anaerobic methanogenesis. Water Res. 18 (1984) 357–361

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hamdi, M.: The effects of pretreatment and agitation on the batch anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewaters. Bioresource Techno. 36 (1991) 173–178

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thauer, R. K.; Jungermann, K.; Decker, K.: Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bact. Rev. 41 (1977) 100–180

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martin, A.; Borja, R.; Garcia, I.; Fiestas, J. A.: Kinetics of methane production from olive mill waste-water. Process Biochem. 26 (1991) 101–107

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cail, R. G.; Barford, J. P.: Thermophilic semi-continous anaerobic digestion of palm-oil mill effluent. Agrical. Waste 13 (1985) 295–304

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sayadi, S.; Ellouz, R.: Decolorization of olive mill wastewater by the white rot fungus Phanerochate chrysosporium involvement of the lignin degrading system. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37 (1992) 813–817

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gharsallah, N. Influence of dilution and phase separation on the anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewaters. Bioprocess Engineering 10, 29–34 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373532

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373532

Keywords

Navigation