Abstract
This study advocates the explicit incorporation of the production of in-house information services into input-output tables in order to overcome the limitations imposed by conventional accounting frameworks which distort the relationship between manufacturing and services. This relationship is analysed using a well-known impact methodology. The importance of consumption induced multiplier effects, i.e. demand linkages, is also emphasised. The shift in perception of intersectoral relationships which adoption of our methodology provides is demonstrated using Japan in 1980 as a case study. It is shown that ‘conventional’ analysis seriously underestimates the importance of services for output and employment creation. Comparisons to a recent study by Park and Chan (1989) are drawn which provided the stimulus for this paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DiamondJ. (1974), ‘The analysis of structural constraints in developing economies: A case study’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 36, 95–108.
Eliasson, G. (1988), The Knowledge Base of an Industrial Economy, Stockholm, Research Report No. 33, The Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research.
EngelbrechtH.-J. (1986a), ‘From newly industrialising to newly informatising country: The primary information sector of the Republic of Korea 1975–1980’, Information Economics and Policy, 2(3), 169–194.
EngelbrechtH.-J. (1986b), “The Japanese information economy: Its quantification and analysis in a macroeconomic framework (with comparisons to the U.S.)’, Information Economics and Policy, 2(4), 277–306.
EngelbrechtH.-J. (1990), ‘A comparative analysis of the use of information inputs in the manufacturing sectors of Korea and Japan’, World Development, 18, 77–89.
FriedmanD. (1988), The Misunderstood Miracle: Industrial Development and Political Change in Japan, New York, Cornell University Press.
GershunyJ. (1987), ‘The future of service employment’, in O.Giarini (ed.), The Emerging Service Economy, Oxford, Pergamon Press, pp. 105–124.
HewingsG. (1982a), ‘The empirical identification of key sectors in an economy: A regional perspetive’, The Developing Economies, 20, 173–195.
HewingsG. (1982b), ‘Trade, structure and linkages in developing and regional economies’, Journal of Development Studies, 11, 91–96.
HewingsG. and JensenR. (1986), ‘Regional, interregional and multiregional input-output analysis’, in P.Nijkamp (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 1, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers BV, 295–355.
JensenR. and WestG. (1983), ‘The nature of Australian regional input-output multipliers’, Prometheus, 1(1), 202–221.
KarunaratneN. (1986), ‘An input-output approach to the measurement of the information economy’, Economics of Planning, 20(2), 87–103.
MathewsJ. (1989), ‘New production concepts’, Prometheus, 7(1), 129–148.
ParkS.-H. and ChanK. (1989), ‘A cross-country input-output analysis of intersectoral relationships between manufacturing and services and their employment implications’, World Development, 17(2), 199–212.
PoratM. and RubinM. (1977), The Information Economy, in nine volumes, Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
RiddleD. (1987), ‘The role of the service sector in economic development: Similiarities and differences by development category’, in O.Giarini (ed.), The Emerging Service Economy, Oxford, Pergamon Press, pp. 83–104.
WestG. and JensenR. (1980), ‘Some reflections on input-output multipliers’, The Annals of Regional Science, 14, 77–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier version of the study appeared as Massey Economic Paper No. A9101, January 1991. Comments from two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Engelbrecht, HJ. New perspectives on intersectoral relationships between manufacturing and services. Econ Plann 25, 165–178 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373065
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373065