Skip to main content
Log in

The urethral axis during stress

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of babies >3500 g primimultiparity, previous forceps deliveries, obesity and stress urinary incontinence on urethrovesical junction mobility (UVJ) was determined by the Q-tip test in 440 women divided into four groups according to age. The urethral axis under stress (UAS) for these different categories of patient compared to corresponding nulliparous patients (49°±21) demonstrates an increasing statistically significant difference in UVJ mobility in primiparas (56°±21), multiparas (58°±19), patients with previous forceps delivery (59°±21) and with deliveries of babies >3500 g (61°±17). Surprisingly, obesity does not affect UVJ mobility. Except for postmenopausal women, assessment of UAS in patients with GSI by history demonstrates a 5° higher UVJ mobility compared to continent patients (a 10° higher UVJ mobility was found in a fifth group of clinically proven GSI patients). When considering UAS distribution in the four groups, only 6%–33% of nulliparas have a ‘normal’ UAS of <30°, and 20% of young nulliparous patients have an UVJ hypermotility of >60°, demonstrating perhaps an increased risk of future GSI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diokno AC, Brock BM, Brown D. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and other urologic symptoms in the noninstitutionalized patient. J Urol 1986; 136:1022–1026

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ouslander JC, Kane RL, Abrass IB. Urinary incontinence in elderly nursing-home patients. JAMA 1982; 248:1194–1196

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fantl JA, Wyman JF, McClicsh DK, Bump RC. Urinary incontinence in community-dwelling women: clinical, urodynamic and severity characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162:946–952

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crystle CD, Charme LS, Copeland WE. Q-tip test in stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1971; 38:313–315

    Google Scholar 

  5. Montz FJ. Stanton SL. Q-tip test in female uninary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67:258–260

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garrow JS, Webster J. Quetelet's index as a measure of fatness. Int J Obes 1985; 9:147–150

    Google Scholar 

  7. Green TH Jr. Development of a plan for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1962; 83:632–635

    Google Scholar 

  8. Green TH Jr. The problem of urinary stress incontinence in the female. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1968; 23:603–606

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pelosi MA, Apuzzio JJ, Frattalora MA. A diagnostic device for stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1975; 45:223–226

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karram MM, Bhatia NN. The Q-tip test: standardization of the technique and its interpretation in women with urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71:807–811

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCarthy TA. Urogynecology and urodynamics. Ostergard DR, Bent AE, (eds) Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1991: 100

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walters MD, Diaz K. Q-tip test: a study of continent and incontinent women. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70:208–211

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pregazzi R, Bouche C, Scrimin F, et al. Post-partum perineal evaluation. Role of the Q-tip test. Minerva Ginceol 1989; 41:493–495

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bergman A, McCarthy TA, Ballard CA, et al. Role of the Q-tip test in evaluating urinary incontinence. J Reprod Med 1987; 32:273–275

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richardson DA. Reduction of urethral pressure in response to stress: Relationship to urethral motility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walters MD, Shields LE. The diagnostic value of history, physical examination, and the Q-tip cotton swab test in women with urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159:145–149

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilkie DHL. Stress incontinence and obesity: a study of the effect on urethral function. Neurouro Urodyn 1987; 6:184–185

    Google Scholar 

  18. Asmussen M. Static and dynamic pressure of the lower urinary tract as measured by simultaneous urethral cystometry. Ostergard DR. (ed.) Gynecologic urology and urodynamics 2nd ed, Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1985: 133–165

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koelbl H, Riss P. The significance of body mass index for genuine stress incontinence. Neurouro Urodyn 1987; 6:186–187

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fantl JA, Hurt G, Bump RC, et al. Urethral axis and sphincteric function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155:554–558

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gordon D, Pearce M, Norton P, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and lateral chain urethrocystography in the determination of bladder-neck descent. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 182–185

  22. Versi E, Cardozo L, Studd J. Distal urethral compensatory mechanisms in women with incompetent bladder neck who remain continent, and the effect of the menopause. Neurourol Urodyn 1990; 9:579–590

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bergman A, Koonings PP, Ballard CA. Negative Q-tip test as a risk factor for failed incontinence surgery in women. J Reprod Med 1989; 34:193–197

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, S., De Grandi, P. & Schmidt, N. The urethral axis during stress. Int Urogynecol J 4, 14–18 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372802

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372802

Keywords

Navigation