Abstract
This paper makes three points. First, empathy cannot be considered an epistemic basis for qualitative research and evaluation. Second, it is, however, a valuable method for understanding the private meanings of words and deeds. Third, this method is not completely reliable for purposes of what Popper called refutation, but is useful in what he dubbed scientific conjecture or the generation of theory. Basic researchers will need to take the necessary steps to subject empathetic hunches to critical examination. However, owing to the exigencies of action settings and decision-making, disciplined conjectures are sometimes the most that evaluators can hope to record.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, T.: 1948, ‘The Operation Called “Verstehen”, The American Journal of Sociology 54. Reprinted in F.R. Dallmayr and T.A. Mcarthy (eds.), Understanding and Social Inquiry, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, and in H. Freigel and M. Broadbeck (eds.), Readings in Philosophy of Science, Appleton, Centum and Crofts, New York.
Alexander, H.A.: 1986, ‘Cognitive Relativism in Evaluation’, Evaluation Review 10, 259–280.
Alexander, F.: 1935, ’The Logic of Emotions and Its Dynamic Background’, International Journal of Psychoanalysis 16.
Ayer, A.J.: 1946, Language, Truth, and Logic, Dover, New York.
Ayer, A.J.: 1954, 'Can There Be a Private Language?, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume, p. 28.
Carnap, R.: 1947, Meaning and Necessity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Cronbach, L.: 1975, ‘Beyond the Two Disciplines of Psychology’, American Psychologist 30.
Eisner, E.W.: 1981, ‘On the Differences Between Scientific and Artistic Approaches to Qualitative Research’, Educational Researcher 10, 5–9.
Frege, G.: 1982, ‘On Sense and Reference’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 100, 25–50. Reprinted in P. Geach (ed.), Philosophical Writing, Philosophical Library, New York, and in J.M.E. Moravcsik (ed.), Logic and Philosophy for Linguistics, Atlantic Highlands, Humanities Press, NJ.
Gadamer, H.G.: 1975, Truth and Method, Seabury Press, New York.
Guba, E.: 1978, Toward a Methodology of Naturalistic Inquiry in Educational Evaluation, UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, L.A.
Kripke, S.A.: 1982, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
McGinn, C.: 1984, Wittgenstein on Meaning, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Patton, M.Q.: 1980, Qualitative Evaluation Methods, Sage, Beverly Hills.
Popper, K.R.: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Harper and Row, New York.
Popper, K.R.: 1963, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Harper and Row, New York.
Quine, W.V.O.: 1953, ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, in From a Logical Point of View, Harper and Row, New York.
Rist, R.: 1977, ‘On the Relation Among Education Research Paradigms’, Anthropology and Education Quarterly 8, 37–57.
Russel, B.: 1905, ‘On Denoting’, Mind. Reprinted in R. Marsh and B. Russell (eds.), Logic and Knowledge, G.P. Putnam's Sons, New York.
Ryle, G.: 1959, The Concept of Mind, Barnes and Noble, New York.
Salmon, W.: 1973, Logic (3rd ed.), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ.
Skinner, B.F.: 1953, ‘The Science of Learning and the Art of Teaching’, Harvard Ed. Review 24(2).
Stake, R.: 1978, ‘The Case Study Method in Social Inquiry’, Ed. Researcher 7, 5–8.
Strike, K.: 1972, ‘Explaining and Understanding: The Impact of Science on Our Concept of Mind’, in L.G. Thomas (ed.), Philosophical Redirection of Educational Research, NSSE Yearbook 71. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Weiss, C.: 1972, Evaluation Research, Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, N.J.
Winch, P.: 1958, The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, Macmillan, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper was printed in the Proceedings of the Far Western Philosophy of Education Society, 1989. This version is published with permission of the Far Western Philosophy of Education society. The author is grateful for helpful comments and critisism made by members of the California Association for Philosophy Education. Remaining errors, of course, are the authors responsibility alone.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alexander, H.A. Empathy and evaluation: Understanding the private meanings of behavior. Stud Philos Educ 11, 123–134 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372428
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372428